Computer Science > Discrete Mathematics
[Submitted on 11 Aug 2010 (v1), revised 3 Nov 2010 (this version, v3), latest version 5 Nov 2011 (v4)]
Title:Approximation Analysis of Influence Spread in Social Networks
View PDFAbstract:In the context of influence propagation in a social graph, we can identify three orthogonal dimensions - the number of seed nodes activated at the beginning (known as budget), the expected number of activated nodes at the end of the propagation (known as expected spread or coverage), and the time taken for the propagation. We can constrain one or two of these and try to optimize the third. In their seminal paper, Kempe, Kleinberg and Tardos constrained the budget, left the time unconstrained, and maximized the coverage.
In this paper, we study alternative optimization problems: MINSEED and MINTIME. In MINSEED, a coverage threshold n is given and the task is to find the minimum size seed set such that by activating it, a coverage of n is achieved. In MINTIME, a coverage threshold n and a budget threshold k are given, and the task is to find a seed set of size at most k such that by activating it, a coverage of n is achieved in the minimum possible time. It turns out both these problems are NP-hard.
Given the hardness of the problems, we naturally turn to the subject of approximation algorithms. For MINSEED, we develop a bicriteria approximation by exploiting its relationship to the problem of Real-valued Submodular Set Cover (RSSC). We prove a generic inapproximability result for RSSC suggesting that improving this approximation factor is likely to be hard. For MINTIME we show that even bicriteria and tricriteria approximations are hard under several conditions. Our proof exploits the relationship between MINTIME and the problem of Robust Asymmetric k-center (RAKC). We show, however, that if we allow the budget for number of seeds k to be boosted by a logarithmic factor and allow the coverage to fall short, then the problem can be solved exactly in PTIME.
Finally, we show the value of the approximation algorithms, by comparing them against various heuristics.
Submission history
From: Amit Goyal [view email][v1] Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:35:56 UTC (419 KB)
[v2] Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:34:52 UTC (189 KB)
[v3] Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:29:48 UTC (188 KB)
[v4] Sat, 5 Nov 2011 04:14:24 UTC (179 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.DM
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.