Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Machine Learning

arXiv:1101.1715 (stat)
[Submitted on 10 Jan 2011 (v1), last revised 11 Jul 2011 (this version, v4)]

Title:Finding Consensus Bayesian Network Structures

Authors:Jose M. Peña
View PDF
Abstract:Suppose that multiple experts (or learning algorithms) provide us with alternative Bayesian network (BN) structures over a domain, and that we are interested in combining them into a single consensus BN structure. Specifically, we are interested in that the consensus BN structure only represents independences all the given BN structures agree upon and that it has as few parameters associated as possible. In this paper, we prove that there may exist several non-equivalent consensus BN structures and that finding one of them is NP-hard. Thus, we decide to resort to heuristics to find an approximated consensus BN structure. In this paper, we consider the heuristic proposed in \citep{MatzkevichandAbramson1992,MatzkevichandAbramson1993a,MatzkevichandAbramson1993b}. This heuristic builds upon two algorithms, called Methods A and B, for efficiently deriving the minimal directed independence map of a BN structure relative to a given node ordering. Methods A and B are claimed to be correct although no proof is provided (a proof is just sketched). In this paper, we show that Methods A and B are not correct and propose a correction of them.
Comments: Changes from v3 to v4: Section 1 has been extended with more motivation and a review of the literature. Theorem 3 proves that CONSENSUS is not only NP-hard but NP-complete. A flaw in Theorem 4 has been fixed. The proof of Theorem 5 has been re-written from scratch. Now, it is self-contained, i.e. it does not rely upon the algorithm by Chickering (2004)
Subjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Statistics Theory (math.ST)
Cite as: arXiv:1101.1715 [stat.ML]
  (or arXiv:1101.1715v4 [stat.ML] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1101.1715
Journal reference: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 42, 661-687, 2011

Submission history

From: Jose M. Peña [view email]
[v1] Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:41:50 UTC (49 KB)
[v2] Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:54:15 UTC (49 KB)
[v3] Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:15:07 UTC (54 KB)
[v4] Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:57:34 UTC (130 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
stat.ML
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2011-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
math
math.ST
stat
stat.TH

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)