Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability

arXiv:1109.4653 (physics)
[Submitted on 21 Sep 2011 (v1), last revised 5 Mar 2012 (this version, v2)]

Title:Can the evolution of music be analyzed in a quantitative manner?

Authors:Vilson Vieira, Renato Fabbri, Gonzalo Travieso, Luciano da Fontoura Costa
View PDF
Abstract:We propose a methodology to study music development by applying multivariate statistics on composers characteristics. Seven representative composers were considered in terms of eight main musical features. Grades were assigned to each characteristic and their correlations were analyzed. A bootstrap method was applied to simulate hundreds of artificial composers influenced by the seven representatives chosen. Afterwards we quantify non-numeric relations like dialectics, opposition and innovation. Composers differences on style and technique were represented as geometrical distances in the feature space, making it possible to quantify, for example, how much Bach and Stockhausen differ from other composers or how much Beethoven influenced Brahms. In addition, we compared the results with a prior investigation on philosophy. Opposition, strong on philosophy, was not remarkable on music. Supporting an observation already considered by music theorists, strong influences were identified between composers by the quantification of dialectics, implying inheritance and suggesting a stronger master-disciple evolution when compared to the philosophy analysis.
Comments: 8 pages, 6 figures, added references for sections 1 and 4.C, better mathematical description on section 2. New values and interpretation, now considering a bootstrap method
Subjects: Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an); Sound (cs.SD); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1109.4653 [physics.data-an]
  (or arXiv:1109.4653v2 [physics.data-an] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1109.4653
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2012/08/P08010

Submission history

From: Vilson Vieira da Silva Junior [view email]
[v1] Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:43:46 UTC (103 KB)
[v2] Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:50:09 UTC (181 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.data-an
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2011-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SD
physics
stat
stat.ME

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)