Computer Science > Networking and Internet Architecture
[Submitted on 19 Apr 2016 (v1), last revised 24 Dec 2018 (this version, v5)]
Title:Right buffer sizing matters: some dynamical and statistical studies on Compound TCP
View PDFAbstract:Motivated by recent concerns that queuing delays in the Internet are on the rise, we conduct a performance evaluation of Compound TCP (C-TCP) in two topologies: a single bottleneck and a multi-bottleneck topology, under different traffic scenarios. The first topology consists of a single bottleneck router, and the second consists of two distinct sets of TCP flows, regulated by two edge routers, feeding into a common core router. We focus on some dynamical and statistical properties of the underlying system. From a dynamical perspective, we develop fluid models in a regime wherein the number of flows is large, bandwidth-delay product is high, buffers are dimensioned small (independent of the bandwidth-delay product) and routers deploy a Drop-Tail queue policy. A detailed local stability analysis for these models yields the following key insight: smaller buffers favour stability. Additionally, we highlight that larger buffers, in addition to increasing latency, are prone to inducing limit cycles in the system dynamics, via a Hopf bifurcation. These limit cycles in turn cause synchronisation among the TCP flows, and also result in a loss of link utilisation. For the topologies considered, we also empirically analyse some statistical properties of the bottleneck queues. These statistical analyses serve to validate an important modelling assumption: that in the regime considered, each bottleneck queue may be approximated as either an $M/M/1/B$ or an $M/D/1/B$ queue. This immediately makes the modelling perspective attractive and the analysis tractable. Finally, we show that smaller buffers, in addition to ensuring stability and low latency, would also yield fairly good system performance, in terms of throughput and flow completion times.
Submission history
From: Debayani Ghosh [view email][v1] Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:00:08 UTC (718 KB)
[v2] Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:24:35 UTC (684 KB)
[v3] Sun, 28 May 2017 07:51:25 UTC (685 KB)
[v4] Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:15:13 UTC (706 KB)
[v5] Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:53:16 UTC (836 KB)
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.