Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Systems and Control
[Submitted on 22 Sep 2019 (v1), last revised 26 May 2021 (this version, v7)]
Title:Gradient-Consensus: Linearly Convergent Distributed Optimization Algorithm over Directed Graphs
View PDFAbstract:In this article, we propose a new approach, optimize then agree for minimizing a sum $ f = \sum_{i=1}^n f_i(x)$ of convex objective functions over a directed graph. The optimize then agree approach decouples the optimization step and the consensus step in a distributed optimization framework. The key motivation for optimize then agree is to guarantee that the disagreement between the estimates of the agents during every iteration of the distributed optimization algorithm remains under any apriori specified tolerance; existing algorithms do not provide such a guarantee which is required in many practical scenarios. In this method, each agent during each iteration maintains an estimate of the optimal solution and, utilizes its locally available gradient information along with a finite-time approximate consensus protocol to move towards the optimal solution (hence the name Gradient-Consensus algorithm). We establish that the proposed algorithm has a global R-linear rate of convergence if the aggregate function $f$ is strongly convex and Lipschitz differentiable. We also show that under the relaxed assumption of $f_i$'s being convex and Lipschitz differentiable, the objective function error residual decreases at a Q-linear rate (in terms of the number of gradient computation steps) until it reaches a small value, which can be managed using the tolerance value specified on the finite-time approximate consensus protocol; no existing method in the literature has such strong convergence guarantees when $f_i$ are not necessarily strongly convex functions. The communication overhead for the improved guarantees on meeting constraints and better convergence of our algorithm is $O(k\log k)$ iterates in comparison to $O(k)$ of the traditional algorithms. Further, we numerically evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm by solving a distributed logistic regression problem.
Submission history
From: Vivek Khatana [view email][v1] Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:04:27 UTC (748 KB)
[v2] Wed, 25 Sep 2019 22:08:04 UTC (1,009 KB)
[v3] Thu, 23 Apr 2020 06:50:24 UTC (1,391 KB)
[v4] Thu, 30 Jul 2020 18:15:48 UTC (1,713 KB)
[v5] Mon, 26 Apr 2021 22:06:33 UTC (1,794 KB)
[v6] Sat, 22 May 2021 16:04:46 UTC (1,795 KB)
[v7] Wed, 26 May 2021 04:25:34 UTC (1,798 KB)
Current browse context:
eess.SY
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.