View source for User:Missvain/Archive1

{{talkarchive}}== {{autotranslate|base=end of copyvios/heading}} ==
{{autotranslate|base=end of copyvios}} [[User:Eusebius|Eusebius]] ([[User talk:Eusebius|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 21:39, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

::Hi thanks for posting this. I regret that I've caused so many problems regarding copyright issues. I am working in the best interest in Wikipedia and I do not do this with bad intentions. I suppose I am just confused, since there are plenty of other images treated and uploaded in the same way I have done, and they are still on Commons. Again, sorry for any problems this has caused. If I need to nominate the images on my own to be deleted, I will. I keep reading about copyright and I'm just confused on where I've gone wrong. Thanks for bringing up the problems, and again, I apologize for any issues I have caused. [[User:Missvain|Missvain]] ([[User talk:Missvain#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 20:57, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
:::Hi. I will unblock you now that you've reacted to the situation (thanks for that). Uploading your own photographs is usually ok (unless, for instance, for recent statues in US, but you're not expected to know everything about copyright, so it's the kind of honest mistake we can totally understand, even if the files get deleted). Regarding "Wikipedia saves public art" stuff, I think it is currently debated on the English Wikipedia, you should refer to this discussion if you're part of this project or if you plan to keep uploading their files. Regards, --[[User:Eusebius|Eusebius]] ([[User talk:Eusebius|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 21:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
::Thanks for your understanding. I've been a big overwhelmed with the situation, and yes, I'm very familiar with the WSPA argument on English Wiki. I do have a question, and perhaps, with your expertise, you can answer this easily for me. Here is an image that I have taken, that is on MY personal Flickr (not the WSPA account, which myself and four other people have access to) [http://www.flickr.com/photos/sarahvain/3776089701/ Oldenburg in Philly] - now, is that image something I can upload onto my Commons page and not have any problems? As long as I made it CC or my usual Sharealike-CC? Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it!! I just get a bit confused! THANK YOU! [[User:Missvain|Missvain]] ([[User talk:Missvain#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
:::Well, the main subject is a modern work of art, for which there is [[COM:FOP#United_States|no Freedom of Panorama]] in the United States, so we need a [[COM:ET|formal permission]] from the artist in order to host this image. --[[User:Eusebius|Eusebius]] ([[User talk:Eusebius|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 05:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
::Ok, thanks. The artist is dead. So I presume you'd need permission of the owner then? (i.e. the museum that owns the piece?)Because there are contemporary works like this [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Outside_the_museum.jpg] that don't show proof of permission on the Commons page, and is uploaded from the users Flickr, who took the picture. [[User:Missvain|Missvain]] ([[User talk:Missvain#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 12:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
:::No, not from the owners, from the copyright holders! By default, it is the author's heirs, unless the rights over the work have been transferred to somebody else. It can be quite difficult to get such a permission. The permission procedure is detailed [[COM:OTRS|here]], and standard permission statements can be found [[COM:ET|here]]. The picture you point out is problematic in exactly the same way as yours (and as many pictures on Commons). --[[User:Eusebius|Eusebius]] ([[User talk:Eusebius|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 14:21, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
::Great, thanks again for your kindness and explanations! I really appreciate it. :) I look forward to being un-banned so I can make sure I upload only the *appropriate* images and can add some of my own (as I have started) to the collection. Thank you. [[User:Missvain|Missvain]] ([[User talk:Missvain#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
:::I have unblocked you yesterday! It didn't work? --[[User:Eusebius|Eusebius]] ([[User talk:Eusebius|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
::It says it expires at 9:00 pm tonight :) [[User:Missvain|Missvain]] ([[User talk:Missvain#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
:::I see no block anymore! --[[User:Eusebius|Eusebius]] ([[User talk:Eusebius|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 20:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
::Still blocked :) I can't even edit my userpage, not til 9 pm hehehe... [[User:Missvain|Missvain]] ([[User talk:Missvain#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 20:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

== Blocked 1 week ==

{{blocked user|uploading unfree files after warnings|1 week}}--[[User:Eusebius|Eusebius]] ([[User talk:Eusebius|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 07:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

== 3 File deletion requests withdrawn ==
My File deletion requests [[Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Llamas_by_Una_Hanbury_(1993)_SOS!_Control_IAS_DC000115.jpg]], [[Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Graft_by_Roxy_Paine_(2009).jpg]], [[Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Cheval_Rouge_(Red_Horse)_by_Alexander_Calder_(1974)_SOS!_Control_IAS_08600068.jpg]] are withdrawn. 

are withdrawn. The project Wikipedia Saves public art has received overwhelming support at [[:en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia Saves Public Art]]. [[User:Teofilo|Teofilo]] ([[User talk:Teofilo|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 05:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
:User support doesn't make an unfree file become free. --[[User:Eusebius|Eusebius]] ([[User talk:Eusebius|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 05:45, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, those images obviously violate copyright! LOL [[User:Missvain|Missvain]] ([[User talk:Missvain#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 14:48, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

==  Your deletion requests ==

Hi Missvain,

thx for your help on fighting spam on the commons, but please check usage before you post a DR. --[[User:Mbdortmund|Mbdortmund]] ([[User talk:Mbdortmund|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

== {{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}} ==
{{Autotranslate|1=|2=Photos from SIRIS|3=plural|base=Idw}} [[User:Trycatch|Trycatch]] ([[User talk:Trycatch|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 04:51, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

== Please stop your tagging ==

See [[Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Images of statues in the United States]]. And [[user talk:Hammersoft#Stop your tagging]]. /[[User:Pieter Kuiper|Pieter Kuiper]] ([[User talk:Pieter Kuiper|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 08:26, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

:Agreed. We are headed toward a formal policy against using {{tl|Speedy}} for FOP cases, particularly in the United States. While [[:File:Nessie at Grand Rapids Railroad Bridge.jpg]], a 2009 work, may be completely obvious, [[:File:Mother Cabrini Shrine Golden CO.png]], a 1954 work, is not -- it does not appear in the [http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First Copyright Office database of renewals]. I have added {{tl|PD-US-norenewal}}.

:I certainly agree with you that some of the images you recently tagged need to be deleted, but {{tl|speedy}} is for obvious cases -- where the deleting Admin can see at a glance that it should go.  Fifty admins do about 27,000 deletes a month (the other 210 do the remaining 3,000), and it is not part of their job to do the sort of research required for US FOP cases. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>Jim</strong> . . . . <small><small>[[User:Jameslwoodward|Jameslwoodward]]</small> ([[User talk:Jameslwoodward|talk to me]])</small> 12:01, 13 November 2010 (UTC)