Commons:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 149: Line 149:
:This is the list of remaining image-reviewers inactive for 18 months (taken as 548 days). --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 10:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
:This is the list of remaining image-reviewers inactive for 18 months (taken as 548 days). --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 10:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
::Users [//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=massmessage&user=Steinsplitter&page=User%3ASteinsplitter%2Flr2&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_thanks_log=1 notified] --[[User:Steinsplitter|Steinsplitter]] ([[User talk:Steinsplitter|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 15:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
::Users [//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=massmessage&user=Steinsplitter&page=User%3ASteinsplitter%2Flr2&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_thanks_log=1 notified] --[[User:Steinsplitter|Steinsplitter]] ([[User talk:Steinsplitter|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 15:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
::: If I want to keep the flag, do I ask about it here or somewhere else? [[User:VasilievVV|vvv]]<sup>[[User talk:VasilievVV|t]]</sup> 21:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)


== [To Commmons admins]: missing detection of some non-empty redirected categories ==
== [To Commmons admins]: missing detection of some non-empty redirected categories ==

Revision as of 21:53, 13 February 2015

Shortcut: COM:AN

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section] 		User problems
[new section] 		Blocks and protections
[new section] 		Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Translate this page
COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES


Inactive Image-reviewers

The following 63 accounts have been inactive for 2 years or more (some are many years more, and a few accounts are marked as retired) and have the Image-reviewer right. I am unsure if this is supposed to be part of standard rights housekeeping, but worth asking these users if they still need it. If they do, then there may be a case to ask them to request the right again as expectations have changed since they last used it. Raising on this noticeboard, though no objection if someone feels it needs to move to BN --Fæ (talk) 12:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Image-reviewer table
  1. 17Drew (talk · contribs)
  2. 444pixels (talk · contribs)
  3. A7x (talk · contribs)
  4. Alpha Quadrant (talk · contribs)
  5. Alpta (talk · contribs)
  6. Americophile (talk · contribs)
  7. Amicon (talk · contribs)
  8. Andrew Levine (talk · contribs)
  9. Animum (talk · contribs)
  10. Brandon (talk · contribs)
  11. Brian (talk · contribs)
  12. Brynn (talk · contribs)
  13. Caspian blue (talk · contribs)
  14. Ceranthor (talk · contribs)
  15. Chzz (talk · contribs)
  16. Coelacan (talk · contribs)
  17. Computerjoe (talk · contribs)
  18. Drilnoth (talk · contribs)
  19. Edub (talk · contribs)
  20. Enricopedia (talk · contribs) Feel free to remove --Enricopedia ⇄ 13:39, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Removed. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC)    [reply]
  21. Erwin (talk · contribs)
  22. Evalowyn (talk · contribs)
  23. Fernando Estel (talk · contribs)
  24. Fetchcomms (talk · contribs)
  25. Filnik (talk · contribs)
  26. Flamurai (talk · contribs)
  27. Fr33kman (talk · contribs)
  28. Greeves (talk · contribs) Removed: only 23 edits (including userpage edits), no edits since 2008 --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Hdtcommons83 (talk · contribs)
  30. Heligoland (talk · contribs) Removed: granted in 2010 but never edited --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Iamunknown (talk · contribs) Feel free to remove --Iamunknown (talk) 18:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Removed, thanks for your services. — Revi 09:29, 4 February 2015 (UTC)    [reply]
  32. JamieS93 (talk · contribs)
  33. Johntex (talk · contribs)
  34. Kahuroa (talk · contribs)
  35. Kakofonous (talk · contribs)
  36. LeaveSleaves (talk · contribs)
  37. MacMed (talk · contribs)
  38. Malo (talk · contribs)
  39. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs)
  40. McLurker (talk · contribs)
  41. Miranda (talk · contribs)
  42. Moneya (talk · contribs)
  43. Monobi (talk · contribs)
  44. NonvocalScream (talk · contribs)
  45. Nousernamesleft (talk · contribs)
  46. Patstuart (talk · contribs)
  47. Privatemusings (talk · contribs)
  48. Pumpmeup (talk · contribs)
  49. RG2 (talk · contribs)
  50. Rocket000 (talk · contribs)
  51. Sanchom (talk · contribs)
  52. Sodakan (talk · contribs)
  53. Sopoforic (talk · contribs)
  54. The Wordsmith (talk · contribs)
  55. Truu (talk · contribs)
  56. Tyrenius (talk · contribs)
  57. Vaya (talk · contribs)
  58. WODUP (talk · contribs)
  59. Xymmax (talk · contribs)
  60. Yamanbaiia (talk · contribs)
  61. Yummifruitbat (talk · contribs)
  62. Zachary (talk · contribs)
  63. З2Х (talk · contribs)

 Info Notified all affected users (User:Monobi talkpage is fullprotected). --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because there is no oppose, i am inclined to remove the flag from all accounts where last edit is before 2011. Concerns? --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds fine with me. Natuur12 (talk) 11:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fine with me too. If the accounts are inactive then they don't need them anyway. We always have procedure to restore them. ~ Nahid Talk 12:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
+1. -- Geagea (talk) 12:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
+1. Thank you Fæ for raising this issue. Green Giant (talk) 13:54, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK for me. Yann (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK I removed the flag from all accounts where last edit was before 2011 and RG2, Privatemusings, Miranda and Computerjoe because less than 4 edits in 2011. And i removed all right from З2Х - rights never used and inactive since 2011, 2nd account of 32X. Users can request lr flag back at COM:LRR. Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Fæ: can you please update the list. Thanks --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Alpha Quadrant (talk · contribs)
  2. Americophile (talk · contribs)
  3. Brian (talk · contribs)
  4. Brynn (talk · contribs)
  5. Ceranthor (talk · contribs)
  6. Chzz (talk · contribs)
  7. Erwin (talk · contribs)
  8. Evalowyn (talk · contribs)
  9. Fetchcomms (talk · contribs)
  10. Filnik (talk · contribs)
  11. Fr33kman (talk · contribs)
  12. Kahuroa (talk · contribs)
  13. MacMed (talk · contribs)
  14. Malo (talk · contribs)
  15. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs)
  16. NonvocalScream (talk · contribs)
  17. Rocket000 (talk · contribs)
  18. Sanchom (talk · contribs)
  19. Truu (talk · contribs)
  20. Trycatch (talk · contribs)
  21. Xymmax (talk · contribs)
  22. Zachary (talk · contribs)
--Fæ (talk) 14:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the updated list. I think at the most we should give them seven days from when they were notified, so anybody who hasn't responded by 9 February should have the permission removed. Green Giant (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed all of these users from image reviewers group.Thank you Fæ for your efforts. Please let us know if there are any users in this group who have not edited in the last 18 months as they will need notifying soon. Green Giant (talk) 02:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Angusmclellan (talk · contribs)
  2. AnonEMouse (talk · contribs)
  3. BarkingFish (talk · contribs)
  4. C-M (talk · contribs)
  5. Chaser (talk · contribs)
  6. David1217 (talk · contribs)
  7. Dnikitin (talk · contribs)
  8. Doug (talk · contribs)
  9. Raeky (talk · contribs)
  10. Samuel Grant (talk · contribs)
  11. Spundun (talk · contribs)
  12. Stevenfruitsmaak (talk · contribs)
  13. VasilievVV (talk · contribs)
  14. Yarnalgo (talk · contribs)
This is the list of remaining image-reviewers inactive for 18 months (taken as 548 days). --Fæ (talk) 10:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Users notified --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If I want to keep the flag, do I ask about it here or somewhere else? vvvt 21:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[To Commmons admins]: missing detection of some non-empty redirected categories

See Template talk:Category redirect#MediaWiki bug (and solution): missing detection of some non-empty redirected categories. (Please reply there). The cause of this old (MediaWiki) bug, and its solution, are fully explained there, but the template is protected, and I cannot fix it myself. verdy_p (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use {{Sudo}} next time. — Revi 14:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No the template is heavily used, and I understand that it remains protected for admins. My proposed fix is simple to do immediately by an admin without unprotecting the template. And please reply on the template talk page, where it can be followed for long (not the case of this noticeboard). verdy_p (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sudo exists to request admin's attention of protected pages. — Revi 14:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Verdy p: Please post the content of the fixed template on pastbin (or similar) and i will copy&past it in the template. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is already done on that talk page: look at the very visible frame. That's all what needs to be done, a single replacement. verdy_p (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- {{PAGENAME}}
+ {{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}}}

^^ Can you confirm that this change is OK? --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Steinsplitter: Yes, this is also the only correction I made in its /sandbox subpage (only one line, the 6th line, needs to be fixed, the line with PAGESINCAT; it is not needed for other occurences with #ifeq: or for showing the pagename, as I explained on that talk page). verdy_p (talk)14:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There may be other templates having exactly the same problem (those used to track various issues in pages, for feeding tracking categories that should remain empty). verdy_p (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done @Verdy p: Edit request fulfilled. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You've replaced ALL occurences, only one occurence was needed, as I said (only because "PAGESINCAT:" cannot accept an HTML-encoded category name, but "#ifeq:" and "#switch:" decodes them without problem).
Wasn't I very clear, by even giving you the link to the modified code (with the versioned page in the history) and with full explainations in the Templace talk page?
And why did you insist in replynig only here? My message in the template talk page has absolutely no responses. I will soon move this discussion on the Template talk page (thuis noticeboard will never survive long enough). verdy_p (talk) 12:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Verdy p:
a) If you request a change here, i reply here.
b) If you like to request a change of a protected template use {{Editrequest}}
c) Pleas speak clear. You need to give me a line number or something similar.
d) I am a volonteer and not your employee. Therefore please change your language.
-- Steinsplitter (talk) 12:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
a) No. I requested a change on another page, but I just pinged this one (just a notification here) and asked explicitly' to reply to the other page with the link since the beginning. You insisted to do your own way, and you did not read.
b) No. I understand that the template remains protected, I did not ask to do the change myself, just asked for some admin to do it (there was no emergency). I've explained that, but you did not read it.
c) No. I was extremely clear but you did not read. And I did exactly what you asked (giving you a link to the edited page, as well as the line number! and still bringing you to the talk page to explain this in more details if you want that you did not want to read and that you have still not read at all (and never replied to). But even in my reply here (read above), I just asked you to change ONLY one occurence...
d) No. I was polite with you, but you did not read.
How can I say that to you? Even in your last reply, you don't read at all what you write to even check if this was senseful. Actually you never read anything, you've proven repeatedly this basic fact. verdy_p (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Errm... Can you please claim down and stop with wrong accusations!? You did not read... {{Editrequest}} is not for requesting unprotection, it is for requesting changes on protected pages. You schold thank that someone (me in this case) looks at your edit request... and not the contrary. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have never made here any request explicitly to you. And I didn't even use the "editrequest" template (another nonsense reply from you, you do'nt check before replying), but to some admin that would read my notice just pinged here. Next time, given the fact that:
  • you absolutely don't understand what you do,
  • and don't understand at all what people are saying,
  • even when they use the same language as you,
  • and even when they just send a single line sentence to reply to you,
  • and even when they fully do what you ask them them to do to prepare your possible action,
then abstain of doing anything requested by others, and use only your own responsbility
(but your current position as an admin on Commons or in any other wikimedia project is very questionable if you can't read anything that people are saying to you). verdy_p (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Verdy p. Please calm down and stop any personal attacks immediately. Thank you. --Krd 13:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am calm and I am not requesting to you any other correction. But after your action (that you clearly did not understand at all), I had to perform tests to see if your additional corrections (that I did not request) were working. Your additions seem not being harmful (even if they were not needed), so don't change anything else and keep it.
But it was necessary to inform you (and others) that your "DONE" reply (without more details, than "Edit request fulfilled") was NOT what was requested.
I acted responsibly everytime. It's not my fault if Steinsplitter just refused to visit the talk page that explained evrything, and if he did not even read a single line reply on this page where he inisted to stay. I discovered other pages using PAGESINCAT: in templates, with the same problem but could fix these templates (with an accurate edit summary). verdy_p (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I had to block you for 2 days per your continued personal attacks. — Revi 14:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. -- Geagea (talk) 14:06, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe. But to be frank, once I was young and full of energy I could have behaved similarly to Verdy p. @Verdy p: It's easy to avoid this kind of stupid discussion: Post a solution for copying & pasting to a page (don't assume any admin here is able do complicated stuff like a history merge or even understands why it's generally good practise to do so for edit requests; most of them never worked with a revision control system, nor used a "blame" tool ever in their life), add a bold link to that page; request that your name is cited in the edit summary; in one or two sentences explain why the change is necessary; use {{Edit request}} if you request a change to a protected page. This is what the template is for. And finally, if you feel you are wrong at a place, lust leave. -- Rillke(q?) 21:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tracked in Phabricator
Task T57473

Unless it is just me it seems to have disappeared in the past 24 hours or so. Makes life much harder when working cross wiki. Any thoughts/fixes? --Herby talk thyme 10:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have footer Taivo: Subpages · User rights · Edit count · User uploads · CentralAuth · Global contribs · Recent activity Taivo (talk) 12:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hum - must be something I've done unintentionally - still missing for me. Thanks anyway --Herby talk thyme 16:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Aah (& call this sort of ✓ Done). I hit a link the other day which had a language switch in it. Changing it back I picked en-gb - looks like there is an en fotter but not an en gb footer. If anyone has a moment (I think it is a mediawiki page) could they just copy the en one to the en-gb one to save confusion for others in the future. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 16:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For Britain. IMHO there should be a fallback to MediaWiki:Sp-contributions-footer for any language that hasn't specified a custom footer. -- Rillke(q?) 16:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed and thanks --Herby talk thyme 17:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, are you able to implement this Rillke? Thanks. --99of9 (talk) 02:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nemo_bis and Siebrand will know. -- Rillke(q?) 00:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS tickets added by non-OTRS volunteers

Is the tagging of image pages with references to OTRS tickets supposed to be tagged on new uploads? This does not appear to be happening currently, meaning that it is an easy loophole for anyone that wishes to misquote OTRS tickets. Refer to RecentChanges by tag.

A special report or search could be created (catscan2 will do it), however functionally, this seems more appropriate to be part of how the normal tag works. --Fæ (talk) 15:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As this was asked about on IRC with some apparent confusion, to reiterate, the OTRS tag works for changes but not for uploads. This is a potential loophole for our copyright checks.
Examples I have recently come across of accounts without OTRS access uploading without being tagged (and without any assertion of misbehaviour nor any claim of consistency in searching these out):
  1. 12 Feb ticket:2006051010009863 - Horcrux92 uploaded Chiesa_di_Santa_Croce_(Piombino).jpg
  2. 9 Feb ticket:2011051110007737 - Lokomotive74 uploaded Naphat Seesraum.jpg, Taneekarn_Dangda.jpg, Silawan_Intamee.jpg and Kanjana_Sungngoen.jpg
  3. 3 Feb ticket:2012011710005331 - Sporti uploaded File:Nataša Sukič 2015.jpg and File:Tatjana_Greif_2015.jpg
  4. 6 Jan ticket:2015010610016522 - Obelix uploaded and edited Skäralid.JPG
--Fæ (talk) 12:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find the bugreport on phabricator... (the bug is reported, but phab. has a bad search engine) but new uploads can't be scanned (wikitext scan) with AbuseFilter. :( --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add me in if you find it. :-)
Note, though I currently have a handy script to rapidly find OTRS ticketed images in a day's RecentChanges, it does not pull the wikitext for all potential image candidates, if I did, then doing this remotely would probably be slower than real time, especially when we have a significant batch upload happening! Consequently the ones I find will be haphazard and if we are going to address this, it needs to be at a more basic level than a remote user bot, such as a positive check at the upload event that anyone quoting OTRS tickets is in the OTRS group at that moment, and tags or gives warnings as needed. --Fæ (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
--> phabricator:T21565 --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Steinsplitter: Task is now to track the AF bug, the necessary local workarounds/tasks here until fixed don't fit into phabs scope at the moment.--se4598 22:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As mentioned on Phab, if it is unlikely to be fixed or prioritized for the visible future, then it's best to say that on Commons and we can shop around for someone to put a bot together. With the new facility of web sockets, it should be easier to put a true real-time bot together rather than retrospectively licking the log (not that that's a bad thing, I'm just not convinced it can become efficient).
To be honest, as I have been kicked out of OTRS for reasons that are either still being kept a secret from me, or bizarrely unspecific, I have not been left with much of a personal incentive as an unpaid volunteer to take this on myself. In practice it makes sense for someone with OTRS access to be able to test it while developing it. --Fæ (talk) 16:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

pic to delete

please someone could delete the real pic thanks--Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope

I'd say this guy is outside of scope Special:ListFiles/Витяня_ИТАЛЬЯНЕЦ. Palosirkka (talk) 12:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is not scope (some may be in scope), but some are blatant copyright violations and all are likely to be copyright violations. --Fæ (talk) 12:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Deleted, user warned. --A.Savin 12:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please close this DR

Commons:Deletion requests/Poets from Laos empty gallery--Motopark (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benetton assassina.jpg

File:Benetton assassina.jpg (is defamatory material) é material difamatório. O revolucionário aliado (talk) 15:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ DoneDeleted by Green Giant as copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete copyvios

Special:ListFiles/Honda_KL seems to be promotional and copyvios.--Motopark (talk) 19:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done by Denniss. Green Giant (talk) 19:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Errrr

This seems potentially problematic - take a look at the DR logic for example. For a "new" user there does seem to be an agenda. Cheers --Herby talk thyme 09:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done User warned, edits reverted. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hack user

This image has been used to vandalise es wp and likely should be deleted. In practice given the nature of the edit/name etc the account is questionable. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 13:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Deleted by A.Savin and user blocked by Denniss. Green Giant (talk) 15:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive words?

Here. I think the words used on this user page are offensive and I would imagine others may well find that the case. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 14:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Deleted. Green Giant (talk) 15:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User add out of scope text to picture

User add out of scope text to picture File:MUERTE DE JUAN ANLLO.jpg--Motopark (talk) 18:45, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are +100 pending protected edit requests... Help appreciated. — Revi 04:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=150015046"