User talk:Matthias M.

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Revision as of 14:21, 29 May 2020 by Achim55 (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 2003:C4:8F08:3367:B556:19DD:8E7:E286 (talk) to last revision by Magog the Ogre)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:DTA_CuSO4_5H2O.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Code·is·poetry 08:58, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the license information yourself [1]. I fixed it, but never do so again! --Matt 13:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Correction: I was wrong: [2] The user never set a license himself at de.wikipedia - someone else put GFDL there. --Matt 13:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Hydroxidniederschlaege.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

abf /talk to me/ 11:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Bzr icon 64.png has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

-Thayvian (talk) 22:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hazard O.svg

this image is empty; tested with IE6 and FF3 --Mjoppien (talk) 08:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SVG seems to work fine; tested with FF 3.0.5 --Matt (talk) 09:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
seems to be an effect of our firewall. Now i see it. Thanx,--Mjoppien (talk) 21:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token e256d727fb182587d54b03f61b5e499a

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

New token: 9538ecc53e2bdd2651bd1a050f57ae5d
File:Calcium-5'-ribonucleotide.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Matt (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Disodium_5'-ribonucleotide.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Matt (talk) 12:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vorlage für Bilder, die durch TeX ersetzt werden sollten

Hallo Matthias. Ich habe gesehen, dass du bei zwei Bildern „Low quality chem“ ergänzt hast, weil sie durch TeX ersetzt werden sollten. Was hältst du von einer eigenen Vorlage („Template:Convert to TeX“) dafür? In Category:Image cleanup templates habe ich jedenfalls nichts dergleichen gefunden. Siehe dazu auch User talk:User A1#Math conversion. --Leyo 08:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja stimmt, die Idee ist ganz gut. Man könnte gleich das TeX-Äquivalent in der Vorlage mit angeben. Matt (talk) 08:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Gute Idee, aber vielleicht nur als optionaler Parameter, da nicht alle TeX beherrschen. Magst du die Vorlage erstellen? --Leyo 08:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe Template:Use TeX erstellt und an File:Fotolisis de agua.jpg getestet. Es funktioniert aber noch nicht so wie es sollte. Matt (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So, jetzt sollte es funktionieren. --Leyo 09:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zwei Dinge:

  • Sollte das Icon nicht von LaTeX auf TeX geändert werden?
  • Soll man eine Unterkategorie für Bilder einrichten, für welche ein TeX-Code angegeben ist (oder auch vice versa)?

--Leyo 13:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Matt (talk) 04:54, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Danke. Spricht etwas dagegen, aus dieser Kategorie eine Unterkategorie von Category:Images which should use TeX zu machen? --Leyo 07:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Habs erledigt. Matt (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe damit auch gemeint, dass ein Bild entweder in die eine oder die andere Kategorie einsortiert wird. --Leyo 17:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cromosomes

thanks a lot :) -LadyofHats (talk) 08:07, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

This is just a name harmonization, as it is in use for widely translated files: basename remains the same, only the language prefix changes. I tagged your image as badname so that only the new “standard” name stays; a bot will clean all the old references before deletion. Regards, Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 21:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Matthias M.!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 19:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed now. Matt (talk) 20:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Lichtabsorbtion_eines_buchenblattes.svg

Hi, ich bin Autor der ursprünglichen Grafik, welche Du bearbeitet hast (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Engelmannscher_Bakterienversuch.svg) Da ich ein OpenSource Biologiebuch schreibe (www.hoffmeister.it), und dort ausschließlich meine sowie public domain Grafiken verwende, wäre es schön, wenn Du meine ursprüngliche public domain Lizenz beibehalten würdest (und nicht einfach heraufstufst!) - und die CCLizenz wieder ändern würdest. Ich denke, das gebietet auch die Fairness! Danke für Dein Engagement Lanzi (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inwiefern bereitet die CC-Lizenz Probleme? "Namensnennung/Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen" ist ja nicht sonderlich restriktiv. Die Lizenz geht konform mit den Open-Content-Richtlinien und ist immer noch für das Open-Source Biologiebuch geeignet, selbst wenn du es kommerziell vertreiben möchtest. Matt (talk) 17:34, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Es verkompliziert leider alles ein wenig. Weil ich mich um eine weitere Lizenz kümmern muss. Abgesehen finde ich es nicht fair, meine Arbeit neu zu lizensieren. Warum möchtest Du die Lizenz beibehalten? Gibt es Gründe dafür? Lanzi (talk) 19:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Der Verzicht auf Copyleft birgt schon die Gefahr, dass jemand wieder ein herkömmliches Copyright anwendet und seine Verbesserungen der Grafik nicht ebenfalls wieder an Wikipedia zurückfließen lässt. Wenn ich eine Grafik lediglich übersetze oder Kleinigkeiten ändere, behalte ich für gewöhnlich die komplette Rechteabgabe, die der Autor gewählt hat bei, auch wenn so eine Lizenz nicht selber wählen würde.
An dieser Stelle ist jedoch viel dazu gekommen, so dass ich eine eigene Lizenz, die meinen eigenen ethischen Ansprüchen genügt, für gerechtfertigt halte. Zudem bin ich nicht mehr der alleinige Autor des Bildes, es wurde bereits von jemand anderem überarbeitet. Du wirst auch fairerweise als Autor genannt, obwohl du selbst darauf verzichtest. Die CC-Lizenz ist recht einfach zu handhaben. Ich kann z.B. anbieten, dass ein Link zurück auf die Bildbeschreibungsseite bei Commons genügt um "den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen." Ein kompletter Abdruck der Lizenz (wie bei der GNU FDL) wird nicht verlangt, ein Link genügt. Selbst da reicht (in meinen Augen) wohl auch der Link zu Commons, da dort ja die Lizenz genannt und verlinkt ist.
Ich war auf www.hoffmeister.it und habe mir die GNU FDL Schulbücher angeschaut. Ich halte eine Veröffentlichung auf Wikibooks für sinnvoll um sie einem größeren Leserkreis sowie zusätzlichen Lektoren und Co-Autoren zugänglich zu machen. Matt (talk) 21:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Deine eigenen ethischen Ansprüche interessieren mich ehrlich geagt nicht so sehr. Auch Diene Einstellung in Bezug auf Copyleft ist in diesem Fall unerheblich. Onb 3 Vierecke und ein paar Punkte einen höheren Wert als ein Diagramm darstellen mag ich auch beweifeln. Ich finde diese Diskussion ehrlich gesagt frustrierend. Wegen genau solcher Sachen und ähnlich schräger Ansichten haben schon haufenweise Leute Wikipedia verlassen. Das ist schade. Ich verstehe ehrlich gesagt Deine Motivation nicht. Es wäre eine Kleinigkeit, für ich alles zu ändern. Deine Angebotenen Kompromisse sind leider keine, da sie nicht das Problem an sich betreffen. Du änderst eine fremd erteilte Lizenz! Wenn es mir um eine Namensnennung ginge, hätte ich wohl kaum eine Pd Lizenz gewählt. Entschuldige den harten Ton, aber ich finde das von Dir sehr eigenwillig entschieden und keinesfalls demokratisch geschweige denn im Sinne eines fairen Miteinanders.

Ich bitte Dich erneut, die Lizenz zu ändern!

Danke für die positiven Kommentare zu meinem Buchprojekt. Das Chemiebuch ist bei Wikibooks (zumindest teilweise), das Biobuch wird auch folgen, aber erst, wenn ein Grundgerüst steht, und das ist frühestens 2010 der Fall, da ich noch einige Kapitel überarbeiten muss. Lanzi (talk) 21:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe lediglich meine "drei Vierecke und ein paar Punkte" lizensiert, dein Graph ist doch weiterhin unbeschränkt nutzbar. Ich finde es unsinnig, zunächst komplett auf alle Rechte verzichten zu wollen und dann im nachhinein auf freiwilliges Copyleft zu pochen. Zudem sind Lizenzen nicht widerrufbar und ich bin auch nicht mehr der alleinige Autor. Ich könnte die Datei jedoch in Absprache mit dem anderen Bearbeiter zusätzlich unter der GFDL lizensieren, dann wäre dein Buch wieder einheitlich lizensiert, falls du File:Engelmannscher Bakterienversuch.svg dort verwenden möchtest. Matt (talk) 07:30, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 9538ecc53e2bdd2651bd1a050f57ae5d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! Matt (talk) 20:16, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Matthias, im Bild ist aber nicht zu sehen, dass der Kohlenstoff fünfbindig sein soll. Gruß --FK1954 (talk) 13:52, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Es handelt sich auch um eine 3-Zentren-2-Elektronbindung, vgl. Bayer/Walter ISBN 3-7776-1221-9 S.31 Matt (talk) 17:00, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So stehts im Beyer-Walter - aber die Fünfbindigkeit des C-Atoms (wie es im WP-Artikel steht) kommt dabei nicht rüber (darauf kam es mir an)... Gruß, Franz --FK1954 (talk) 17:32, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte auch gleich den SVG-Bug fixen, danke. --Leyo 17:44, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ich weiß nicht so recht was ich machen soll, aber ich habe mal für das Bild einen Einzelnachweis unter w:de:Carboniumion eingefügt. Möchtest du stattdessen einen trigonal-bipyramidalen CH5+ sehen? Ich glaube sowas auch mal an der Tafel gesehen zu haben, aber ich habe dafür keine Quelle. Matt (talk) 05:47, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Eine tbp-Anordnung der H-Atome würde die Fünfbindigkeit des C-Atoms zeigen... In diesem Paper http://media.iupac.org/publications/pac/2000/pdf/7212x2309.pdf wird neben der im Beyer-Walter gezeigten noch eine andere Darstellung verwendet. Hier http://www.pnas.org/content/95/13/7257.full gibts nochmal eine andere Darstellung. Frag mich aber nicht, was nun richtig ist (vielleicht noch was andres?). Gruß --FK1954 (talk) 17:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Eine klassiche AB5-Struktur nach VSEPR kam jetzt in keinem der Paper vor also hatte das wohl nur didaktische Gründe oder wurde des Hörsaal-Scherzes wegen angemalt: "Gibt es auch ein fünfbindigen Kohlenstoff?" ... "Tja, alles keine Nobelpreisgewinner hier." Ich kann nicht bewerten ob die Unterschiede von Bedeutung sind oder im Bereich gestalterische Freiheit liegen. Matt (talk) 07:33, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Silica.jpg and Silica.svg

Hello, you recently altered the image Silica.svg to add a fourth silica atom. I understand why you have done this, however, the silica.svg file is supposed to be an exact copy of the silica.jpg file (only in svg format). It is therefore no longer correct. Would it be possible to revert the silica.svg file back to its original state (as a higher quality version of silica.jpg) and then upload your new image as a new file with a different name. I am the author of silica.jpg and it is a correct 2D representation of the atomic structure of amorphous silica. I don't think the addition of a fourth atom is necessary. If someone wants to upload a 3D representation of the structure then that is fine but it should not overwrite the original silica.jpg or silica.svg file. Thanks. Jdrewitt (talk) 08:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC) P.S. Happy New Year.[reply]

I reverted silica.svg to its original version. Please feel free to upload your new version but with a different file name, e.g. silica2.svg. Thanks, Jdrewitt (talk) 09:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Victims of animal exploitation has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Cheers, JackLee talk 20:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pfirsichfrucht.svg

Hallo, Matthias. Ich habe gestern in File:Pfirsichfrucht.svg einige Rechtschreibfehler korrigiert. Gruß --Tlustulimu (talk) 09:04, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 6da4f38368044422b30508b36647486e

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Commons-Transfers per Bot

Hallo Matthias. Vielen Dank für deine Hilfe beim Commons-Transfers. Ist dir diese IMHO effizientere Methode bekannt? --Leyo 11:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stimmt, da spart man schon ein paar Klicks, danke. Matt (talk) 21:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Den „BotMoveToCommons“-Baustein sollte man dann aber selbst entfernen. --Leyo 12:59, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FOTW images are not generally allowed to be uploaded to Commons (see Commons:Bad_sources#Flags_of_the_World), with the exception of those by Jaume Olle (who has given special permission). AnonMoos (talk) 14:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I simply drew a SVG with Inkscape File:Flagge-Leimuiden.svg as a replacement. Matt (talk) 17:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nachweisreaktionen / Auftragsarbeit

Hey,

ich habe die Fotos alle im AC-Praktikum letztes Halbjahr gemacht. Dieses Semester haben wir leider kein AC-Praktikum mehr. Also kann ich die pixeligen Bilder leider nicht "ersetzen", es gibt lediglich die Fotos, die ich schon auf Commons hochgeladen habe. :(

Schönen Gruß und viel Erfolg noch!

Tubifex (talk) 20:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CommonsHelper

I have stoped uploading to commons for a while, but thanks for advice. --Magul (talk) 17:44, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:50koerner.jpg

Diese Änderung mit Hilfe eines Tools war erstens unvollständig und hat zweitens die Anzeige von Kategorien unterdrückt. Könntest Du überprüfen, ob es sich dabei um einen Anwendungsfehler oder um einen Defekt des Werkzeugs gehandelt hat? --Enzian44 (talk) 21:40, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich glaube beides: das Skript hat alles vermurkst und ich habe es nicht sauber repariert. Matt (talk) 08:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flagge von Wales

Weil du geradebei der von mir hier hochgeladene Flagge die Lizenz ausgebessert hast, hier nochmal das gleiche File:Wales1953-1959.gif, außerdem, müsste das nicht auch für dieses Bild http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Royal_Badge_of_Wales.png , das bis jetzt nicht bei Commons ist, gelten? Eine der Grafiken ist wohl falsch lizensiert (glaub mal eher letzteres...)--Antemister (talk) 09:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In der deutschen Wikipedia werden ausländische Flaggen als amtliches Werk lizensiert, weil bei uns das de:Schutzlandprinzip gilt. Bei Commons hingegen gilt US-Recht und das jeweilige Landesrecht. Template:PD-UKGov passt auch irgendwie nicht so perfekt, aber ein Gegenstück zu Template:PD-Coa-Germany habe ich jetzt nicht gefunden. Matt (talk) 10:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bixin.svg

Can you please specify your concerns about File:Bixin.svg which you tagged with {{Disputed chem}}? I believe that it matches the chemical structure of the trans-isomer of bixin. Thank you. Edgar181 (talk) 19:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, trans-Bixin [3], my mistake, sorry. Matt (talk) 19:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking a second look. Edgar181 (talk) 20:58, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Icons

Hallo Matthias, damit Du Dich nicht wunderst: Gerade habe ich zwei Deiner Icon-Einfügungen in Warnvorlagen zurückgesetzt (Kurzbegründungen siehe [4] und [5]). Die anderen Änderungen habe ich auch gesehen, fand sie aber im Unterschied zu den beiden nicht beanstandenswert. Grüße --:bdk: 05:18, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beschneiden

Hallo Matthias. IMHO hast du File:Naclfrenkeldefect.svg, File:Naclschottkydefect.svg und File:Nacllattice.svg zu stark beschnitten. Etwas Rand sollte schon noch bleiben. --Leyo 15:51, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Windows-logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

High Contrast (talk) 22:21, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bragg.svg

Hi, Matthias. In the Bragg.svg picture I saw many angles marked, but for the Bragg formula, only theta is taken. Please, consider removing alpha and delta from the graphics, as they only make information noise. Perhaps one needs the two angles in other articles that call the Bragg.svg, but I'm not sure. --JPFen (talk) 21:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was initially created for wikipedia:de:Bragg-Gleichung#Herleitung. Please don't remove anything. Matt (talk) 04:59, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:Logo_Fringe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tryphon 18:28, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Sweet receptor + glucose.svg is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Sweet receptor + glucose.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 22:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Should be resolved now. Matt (talk) 12:25, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nur noch etwas: Ich finde die „3HC“ etwas sonderbar. IMHO wäre „CH3“ oder meinetwegen auch „H3C“ besser. --Leyo 12:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, war hässlich gespiegelt und ist nun endgültig aufgehübscht. Im übrigen diese Krüppelglucose, die zuerst angemahnt hab ich aus dem Lehrbuch 1:1 übernommen, aber es sah wirklich etwas komisch aus. Matt (talk) 12:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vergleichsgrafik JPG vs. PNG

Hallo Matthias. Wenn ich mich nicht täusche, hast du mal irgendwo eine schöne Vergleichsgrafik von Kompressionsartefakten in JPG und PNG ergänzt. Es handelte sich um Grafiken, nicht um Fotos. Nur leider habe ich diese nicht mehr gefunden, auch nicht in Category:Compression artefacts. Erinnerst du dich vielleicht noch? --Leyo 13:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe leider keine Ahnung. Matt (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ich glaube, ich hatte File:Comparison of JPEG and PNG.png gesucht. --Leyo 07:33, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Matthias. Aus einem mir unbekannten Grund hast du meinen Fehler aus der Erstversion übernommen… --Leyo 08:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Argh, danke, fixed. Matt (talk) 10:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Acetic_acid.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 17:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aufräumarbeiten

Hi, hätte ne Bitte. Könntest du bei Bot-Aufräumarbeiten wie dieser bitte darauf achten, dass Commons internationales Publikum hat. Den Wenigsten davon dürften deutsch können und dementsprechend wissen, dass das Wort 'selbst' sich zwar auf den Fotografen bezieht, aber nicht sein Name ist. Da haben dann selbst die, die eigentlich richtig weiternutzen wollen, Schwierigkeiten. Danke,. -- Cecil (talk) 23:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Du kannst unter MediaWiki talk:Botcheck.js einen Vorschlag machen. Eventuell kann das automatisch korrigiert werden. Gruß Matt (talk) 15:00, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Matthias. Ich empfehle, das Script cleanup.js auf die Beobachtungsliste zu nehmen, um ggf. relevante Änderungen mitzubekommen. --Leyo 20:06, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Du hast diese Datei in die Category:Hamburg-Barmbek-Nord eingetragen. Das ist (wie hier unschwer zu erkennen ist) eindeutig falsch, da die Richardstraße durch die Stadtteile Barmbek-Süd und Eilbek verläuft. Ich habe sie daher herausgenommen und möchte Dich bitten, sie nach Prüfung des genauen Standortes in die richtige Kategorie einzusortieren. Vielen Dank Mogelzahn (talk) 10:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bin zufällig gestern an der Stelle vorbeigekommen. Die Skulptur steht westlich der Richardstraße und damit weder in Eilbek noch in Barmbek-Süd, sondern auf der Uhlenhorst. Ich habe die Kat. daher jetzt richtig eingetragen. --Mogelzahn (talk) 19:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:2-PropOH-Water-Dehydration.svg is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:2-PropOH-Water-Dehydration.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 03:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Adminauftrag

Kannst du bitte:

--Antemister (talk) 19:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin kein Administrator. Gruß Matt (talk) 06:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, nicht mehr? Gibt es denn hier so eine Adminanfragen-Seite?--Antemister (talk) 19:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
COM:AN oder für deutschsprachig COM:FORUM. --Leyo 22:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Nitrous_oxide_-_10_x_8g.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:34, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

image -I-Effekt.svg

Die delta-Zeichen sind in der Abbildung spiegelverkehrt dargestellt. In der Abbildung -I-Effekt.svg sind sie richtig dargestellt.

Ich habe jetzt bei File:+I-Effekt.svg das Plus/Minus-Zeichen nach vorne gestellt. Die Delta-Zeichen waren nicht spiegelverkehrt in Inkscape. Vielleicht ein Renderingfehler? Bitte unterschreibe deine Diskussionsbeiträge mit vier Tilden. Gruß Matt (talk) 10:25, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:SmirfPlay.png

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:SmirfPlay.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SmirfPlay.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:19, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is unused and seems to be Freeware (no Free Software) so I will just let it be deleted. Btw. I only transferred it to commons. Matt (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know; but the tool automatically informs you because it assumes that, having uploaded it to Commons, you feel a stake in how the image is dealt with. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:54, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Energiediagramm

Hallo Matthias,

du hast dieses Bild von einem Energiediagramm hochgeladen: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Energiediagramm-Enzymreaktion.svg

Mich würde es sehr interessieren, wie bzw. mit welchem Programm man es am besten herstellen kann? Ich würde gerne für den Artikel "Nukleophile Substitution" ebenfalls Energiediagramm herstellen.

Vielen Dank schonmal --Minihaa (talk) 08:54, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe es mit Inkscape übersetzt. Das Original wurde jedoch ebenfalls mit dem Programm gezeichnet. Gruß Matt (talk) 08:58, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Schema-Brennstoffzelle.svg

http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Schema-Brennstoffzelle.svg&filetimestamp=20100826182932#filelinks

Darf ich dein Schema in meiner Arbeit abdrucken, vorraus gesetzt natürlich ich gebe die Quelle an?

Ich finde die Zeichnung sehr anschaulich und sie gibt auch Einiges her. Gruß

Alonerd (talk) 16:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lizenz_Freie_Kunst erklärt die Lizenzbedingungen eigentlich ganz gut: Urheber (nicht nur ich), Lizenz und Quelle nennen. Gruß Matt (talk) 17:03, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hexacyanoferrat(II).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 08:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:FLOW3 logo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

McZusatz (talk) 11:13, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:3L55.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 11:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wolfenstein Enemy Territory logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:50, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:AfCobra11.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.241.218.242 13:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campanimalkingdom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SethAllen623 (talk) 02:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've moved to bugzilla an old proposal of yours. You may want to cc yourself to it. --Nemo 12:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Hippuric acid Schotten-Baumann.svg is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Hippuric acid Schotten-Baumann.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 17:15, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks, I fixed this. Matt (talk) 18:36, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Wasserschlacht plakat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.184.164.139 11:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matthias M.. Your files listed above are in Category:Chemical images that should use vector graphics. Could you please check, if the tag may be removed (in the case of high resolution PNGs), if there is already an SVG version, or if you consider uploading an updated version of higher resolution/quality on top of the old? Thank you. Leyo 13:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the author of that PNG. Matt (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ich seh's, aber VFC hat das nicht berücksichtigt. ;-) --Leyo 16:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Adobe PDF Icon.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mifter (talk) 02:09, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit-Temperatur.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 10:23, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 00:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knifes FGM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elvey (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have literally nothing to do with this file. Matt (talk) 18:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lichtabsorbtion

Lieber Matthias M.,

ich wollte fragen (und sichergehen), ob ich berechtigt bin, folgendes Bild

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Lichtabsorbtion_eines_buchenblattes.svg

für meine wissenschaftliche Diplomarbeit zu benützen (mit Zitation) - würde eventuell die Abbildung noch an meine Bedürfnisse anpassen.

Ich freue mich über eine Antwort,

Danke, Lisa

Ja, kannst du. Zitieren musst du in wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten in jedem Fall unabhängig von der Lizenz. Ich bin nicht der alleinige Autor von File:Lichtabsorbtion_eines_buchenblattes.svg. Per Special:EmailUser/Matthias_M. kann ich dir auch den vollständigen Klarnamen von allen Zeichnern nennen. Das sieht dann in der Quellenangabe besser aus. Schick mir dazu einfach eine e-Mail auf die ich antworten kann. Dann bleibt trotzdem die Anonymität hier bewahrt. Gruß Matt (talk) 19:55, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ET-Legacy.svg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ET-Legacy.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 13:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permissions queues

Hello Matthias M.. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:47, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASCOBANS HighRes Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mbunit.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Basvb (talk) 19:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:UNESCO pic.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:UNESCO pic.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:UNESCO pic.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 19:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benzol Briefmarke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:History Logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Poké95 13:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:COTTON LOGO.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AHeneen (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ra2LogoBKH.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Zache (talk) 02:53, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luanda-Sonangol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mhhossein talk 14:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:SD-Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

204.4.75.35 21:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Oncorhynchus apache.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Warsow logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bohnenbad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GeoTrinity (talk) 08:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:360launcher.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:360launcher.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth O (talk) 12:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to the logs w:de:Benutzer:Puxy originally uploaded this. Matt (talk) 12:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:GTA1 (logo).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lordtobi () 07:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:GMX-Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bachsau (talk) 17:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vas006661.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 19:41, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anatomy of the Human Ear de.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cherkash (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winnipeg flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:35, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sonic Healthcare logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:05, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]