Commons:Administrators
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP
This page explains the role of administrators (sometimes called admins or sysops) on Wikimedia Commons. Note that details of the role, and the way in which administrators are appointed, may differ from other sites.
If you want to request administrator help, please post at Administrators' noticeboard.
There are currently 180 administrators on Commons.
What is an administrator?
Administrators as of December 2024 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 180
If 180 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Technical
Administrators are users with the technical ability on Wikimedia Commons to:
- delete and undelete images and other uploaded files, and to view and restore deleted versions
- delete and undelete pages, and to view and restore deleted revisions
- protect and unprotect pages, and to edit admin-protected pages
- block and unblock users, individual IP addresses and IP address ranges
- edit less-restricted interface messages (see also Commons:Interface administrators)
- rename files
- add and remove user groups
- configure Upload Wizard campaigns
- delete and undelete specific log entries and revisions of pages
- import pages from other wikis
- merge the history of pages
- modify abuse filters
- not create redirects from source pages when moving pages
- override the spoofing checks and title or username blacklist
- send a message to multiple users at once (massmessage)
- use higher limits in API queries
These are collectively known as the admin tools.
Community role
Administrators are experienced and trusted members of the Commons community who have taken on additional maintenance work and have been entrusted with the admin tools by public consensus/vote. Different admins have different areas of interest and expertise, but typical admin tasks include determining and closing deletion requests, deleting copyright violations, undeleting files where necessary, protecting Commons against vandalism, and working on templates and other protected pages. Of course, some of these tasks can be done by non-admins as well.
Administrators are expected to understand the goals of this project, and be prepared to work constructively with others towards those ends. Administrators should also understand and follow Commons' policies, and where appropriate, respect community consensus.
Apart from roles which require use of the admin tools, administrators have no special editorial authority by virtue of their position, and in discussions and public votes their contributions are treated in the same way as any ordinary editor. Some admins may become more influential, not due to their position as such, but from the personal trust they may have gained from the community.
Suggestions for administrators
Please read Commons:Guide to adminship.
Removal of administrator rights
Under the de-admin policy, administrator rights may be revoked due to inactivity or misuse of sysop tools. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.
Apply to become an administrator
All intending administrators must go through this process and submit themselves to RFA, including all ex-administrators who are seeking to return to their previous role.
First, go to Commons:Administrators/Howto and read the information there. Then come back here and make your request in the section below.
- After clicking the appropriate button and creating the subpage, copy the link to the subpage, e.g. "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edit Commons:Administrators/Requests and paste it in at the top of the section, then put it in double curly brackets (e.g. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) to transclude it. Request a watchlist notice at MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice, or edit MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice to put up one if you are an administrator.
- If someone else nominated you, please accept the nomination by stating "I accept" or something similar, and signing below the nomination itself. The subpage will still need to be transcluded by you or your nominator.
Use the box below, replacing Username with your username: |
Voting
Any registered user may vote here although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted. It is preferable you give reasons for both Support and Oppose votes as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to an argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.
Promotion normally requires at least 75% in favour, with a minimum of 8 support votes. Votes from unregistered users are not counted. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. Bureaucrats may, at their discretion, extend the period of an RfA if they feel that it will be helpful in better determining community consensus.
Neutral comments are not counted in the vote totals for the purposes of calculating pass/fail percentages. However, such comments are part of the discussion, may persuade others, and contribute to the closing bureaucrat's understanding of community consensus.
Purge the cache Use the edit link below to edit the transcluded page.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Sahaib (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 18:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikimedia Commons for over 4 years and have learnt a lot in that time. I categorise images, upload images from Flickr and upload my own images in Category:Photographs by Sahaib. I have made mistakes, one of the most recent examples being when I reverted too much (see here) which I regret very much as I should have known better. That being said, the vast majority of my almost 200,000 user contributions are positive which can be seen by the relatively small amount of talk page messages I have received. Sahaib (talk) 18:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Votes
- Weak oppose i dont wanna break his spirit here. yes, he did so much work in small time, he uploaded so many files. but after i checked his user talk page(many and recent deletion notices) and that mentioned com:an/b discussion here i oppose this request. but i willing to change my vote through this request page if answers/comments satisfies me. good luck. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 21:34, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Modern primat: the many recent deletion notice are about images I uploaded years ago such as File:Wikipedia discord on phone.jpg which I uploaded in July 2021 to use as evidence for Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tripple-ddd/Archive. I uploaded File:Radiator in Newton, South Lanarkshire (19).jpg in May 2022, see Category:May 2022 in Newton, South Lanarkshire. File:Moreland Climate Cup poster 2021-11-06-MorelandClimateCup-Coburg-JE IMG 7787 (51658633204).jpg was uploaded from Flickr in November 2021 as part of Category:COP26 Protests in the City of Moreland. Files such as File:Hope & Eden at Odessa II (6779337921).jpg File:Warming Up at Odessa were uploaded from Flickr in September 2022 in Category:Odessa Restaurant (East Village, Manhattan). As you correctly pointed out I was most active in 2022, so it would make sense that the majority of recent deletion requests on my page are about images uploaded from that year or prior. Since then, I have been a lot more careful in what images I upload from Flickr or upload myself. One of the only examples in the last 2 years of discussions about images I uploaded in that time being at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sahaib, specifically the ones that failed COM:FOP Japan as I didn't check to not upload them. However, I believe the deletion of costumed files was inconsistent as they are many similar images in Category:Characters at Disney Experiences which I brought up in the discussion and in an ongoing RFC. The point is I don't think that I should be criticised harshly for this, I again point out the images that have been deleted make up a very small percentage of the files I have uploaded (not sure how many). Sahaib (talk) 07:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I would not hold the deletion of Disney costumed characters against them (I was the deleting admin). As mentioned, there is an ongoing RFC, which I did a second call for in VPC. Abzeronow (talk) 17:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Modern primat: the many recent deletion notice are about images I uploaded years ago such as File:Wikipedia discord on phone.jpg which I uploaded in July 2021 to use as evidence for Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tripple-ddd/Archive. I uploaded File:Radiator in Newton, South Lanarkshire (19).jpg in May 2022, see Category:May 2022 in Newton, South Lanarkshire. File:Moreland Climate Cup poster 2021-11-06-MorelandClimateCup-Coburg-JE IMG 7787 (51658633204).jpg was uploaded from Flickr in November 2021 as part of Category:COP26 Protests in the City of Moreland. Files such as File:Hope & Eden at Odessa II (6779337921).jpg File:Warming Up at Odessa were uploaded from Flickr in September 2022 in Category:Odessa Restaurant (East Village, Manhattan). As you correctly pointed out I was most active in 2022, so it would make sense that the majority of recent deletion requests on my page are about images uploaded from that year or prior. Since then, I have been a lot more careful in what images I upload from Flickr or upload myself. One of the only examples in the last 2 years of discussions about images I uploaded in that time being at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sahaib, specifically the ones that failed COM:FOP Japan as I didn't check to not upload them. However, I believe the deletion of costumed files was inconsistent as they are many similar images in Category:Characters at Disney Experiences which I brought up in the discussion and in an ongoing RFC. The point is I don't think that I should be criticised harshly for this, I again point out the images that have been deleted make up a very small percentage of the files I have uploaded (not sure how many). Sahaib (talk) 07:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral, leaning oppose, per modern primat. Queen of Hearts (talk) 04:14, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support seems like a trustworthy user. Many good and valuable users have had a lot of deletion notices on our talk pages. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support basically because the concerns raised are valid but Bastique makes a strong point. --Bedivere (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:57, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose I checked their participation in DRs and half of them are from this year.Sahaib didn't create any DR this year, an admin did. The reason on all of them is the incorrect usage of {{No permission}}. The most perplexing case is perhaps File:Bola de Nieve.png, a photo taken in the 1950s depicting a legendary musician from Cuba where copyright protection for photographs is 25 years. Apart from their misjudgment Sahaib doesn't notify uploaders when tagging their files with {{No permission}}. Does Sahaib expect people with a handful uploads to check their watchlist every week? Günther Frager (talk) 14:01, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Günther Frager: the user who uploaded the image User:ÑuÑuX, hasn't made any contributions since 21 April 2021 so I don't think notifying them would have made a difference. The photo also doesn't state when it was taken. Sahaib (talk) 14:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- It was not only with :ÑuÑuX, as I wrote you didn't notify any user (> 100) this year. Inactive users are not second hand citizens. If you tag their files you must inform them, it is even written in the tag you used. Your justification is rather cynical if you checked their history and consciously decided not to notify them. Günther Frager (talk) 14:50, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Günther Frager: I did a quick check of some of the discussions and all of the images were uploaded by now inactive users but I can still see, how it is problematic so I promise to notify users going forward. Thanks. Sahaib (talk) 15:08, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- It was not only with :ÑuÑuX, as I wrote you didn't notify any user (> 100) this year. Inactive users are not second hand citizens. If you tag their files you must inform them, it is even written in the tag you used. Your justification is rather cynical if you checked their history and consciously decided not to notify them. Günther Frager (talk) 14:50, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Günther Frager: the user who uploaded the image User:ÑuÑuX, hasn't made any contributions since 21 April 2021 so I don't think notifying them would have made a difference. The photo also doesn't state when it was taken. Sahaib (talk) 14:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support as I believe they will improve the issue pointed out by Günther Frager. --Tmv (talk) 07:12, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
- Please add Babel to your user page. Thank you and best of luck.Fit India 19:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- A few questions for the candidate.
- 1. A user uploads a photograph from Flickr of the entire Louvre courtyard. I.M. Pei's Louvre pyramid is near the middle of the photograph, but it only takes up 10% of the photograph. What would be your process in license reviewing this photo?
- To check Commons:Freedom of panorama guidelines and compare with images in Category:Louvre Pyramid. File:Louvre Museum Wikimedia Commons.jpg is a featured picture and so the image should be fine if the license {{NoFoP-France}} is used. Sahaib (talk) 21:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- OK, would this be the only part of your process or are there other steps involved? Abzeronow (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- The first step would be to ensure that the license is compatible with commons (Commons:Flickr files). Sahaib (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- User answered this correctly in my opinion. Abzeronow (talk) 21:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- The first step would be to ensure that the license is compatible with commons (Commons:Flickr files). Sahaib (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- OK, would this be the only part of your process or are there other steps involved? Abzeronow (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- To check Commons:Freedom of panorama guidelines and compare with images in Category:Louvre Pyramid. File:Louvre Museum Wikimedia Commons.jpg is a featured picture and so the image should be fine if the license {{NoFoP-France}} is used. Sahaib (talk) 21:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- 2. A user uploads the 1924 sound recording by Paul Whiteman's Orchestra of George Gershwin's Rhapsody in Blue, is this OK for Commons, why or why not? Abzeronow (talk) 20:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Per Public domain music, which states that "recordings made between 1923 and 1946 will be protected for 100 years after publication", so presumably the recording is still copyrighted until 2025. Sahaib (talk) 09:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that is correct. Abzeronow (talk) 16:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Per Public domain music, which states that "recordings made between 1923 and 1946 will be protected for 100 years after publication", so presumably the recording is still copyrighted until 2025. Sahaib (talk) 09:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- https://xtools.wmcloud.org/ec/commons.wikimedia.org/Sahaib i checked here. and your contributions really got high when 2022. in other years they are relatively normal amount of contributions. my question is, how did you manage to reach these numbers in 2022? i cant believe you did such a work in 2022 with "hand on your mouse". did you use code or something else... i just wonder. thank you for apply here. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 21:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- In 2022, I created a lot of categories. To create categories and subcategories, I used a combination of what you described as "hand on your mouse" edits as well as Cat-a-lot to move images into subcategories. I used tools such as flickr2commons if I was uploading a large amount of Flickr images. Notable examples from that year include:
- Creating subcategories of Category:Cosplay of Spider-Man by year and Category:Cosplay of Doctor Who by year. I had previously created subcategories of Category:Cosplay of the Teletubbies by year in October 2021.
- Creating Sidemen collage images which can be seen in Category:Sidemen and on the Wikipedia page.
- Creating a lot of subcategories in Category:Photographs of New York City by date. Other users have created more subcategories such as Howard61313, DanielPenfield, Tdorante10, J.-H. Janßen, etc, so I can only give myself partial credit.
- Moving Times Square images from year categories to month and year subcategories (which I mostly created) such as Category:March 2020 in Times Square.
- Creating most of the subcategories in Category:Photographs of Scotland by date (which I continue to do).
- Moving images from Category:Geograph images in the Highland (council area) to about a dozen subcategories such as Category:Geograph images in Thurso. These categories were later deleted along with the whole category structure which had existed for about 10 years in this discussion, I was not aware of the fact that they were temporary categories so I don't believe that this a fault on my part.
- Creating Category:Greenwood Community High School (and subcategories) by uploading images from Flickr.
- Creating a lot of the subcategories of Category:Men wearing glasses by country and Category:Women wearing glasses by country.
- Creating Category:Men wearing glasses and hats, Category:Men with beards wearing glasses, Category:Men with beards wearing hats (and each of their subcategories).
- Creating most of the subcategories in Category:Black and white portrait photographs of men by year and Category:Black and white portrait photographs of women by year (as well as the categories themselves).
Sahaib (talk) 23:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Auntof6 (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 19:35, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Capable, consistently well-intentioned, even-tempered, even-handed, and respectful of existing consensus even when it might not be exactly what she personally would choose to do. Those are pretty much the characteristics we need in an admin. Probably a bit less broadly experienced than a typical person we make an admin, but I would completely trust her to stick to tasks and areas she understands: I've never seen her do otherwise. Jmabel ! talk 19:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
the candidate should "accept" with a short statement and sign it... that timestamp is when the candidacy starts... - Jmabel ! talk 19:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Candidate acceptance: Thank you, Jmabel. I accept this nomination. If elected, I will do my best to help with the tasks I currently understand and feel capable of, and to learn other tasks with time. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Votes
- couple of admins is OK, that makes me Weak support. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 23:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support, although shouldn't this have only been transcluded once Ao6 accepted? Queen of Hearts (talk) 04:10, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as nominator. - Jmabel ! talk 05:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Definitely. I have known them for a very long time, and they are very competent and level-headed. Jianhui67 T★C 06:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support sure thing, and since Jianhui67 supports strongly. Regards, Aafi (talk) 07:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support GPSLeo (talk) 12:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support I would make you an administrator for years ago. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. No concerns. --Ratekreel (talk) 15:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support why not? Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:37, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good experienced gnomish user. Also would have considered co-nominating. Abzeronow (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Would do fine. --Bedivere (talk) 16:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I want to note that I thought they were an admin already. Bedivere (talk) 21:17, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Neutral I am a bit worried about the candidate's indefinite blocks on wikitech.wikimedia.org for impersonation / abuse of multiple accounts. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)- That Wikitech account is not attached to the SUL account. That makes sense because, citing Wikitech, "[it] is the only wiki using the LDAP authentication backend, since a Wikitech account was actually a Wikimedia Developer Account. From a technical administration point of view, it has been a uniquely configured wiki, requiring special casing when performing infrastructure migrations and updates". So, that Auntof6 is not actually this Auntof6. Bedivere (talk) 17:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think there might be a misunderstanding here. Probably someone else created an account to impersonate Auntof6 on Wikitech as that account in question is not attached to Auntof6's main account. I would appreciate an explanation from Auntof6 though. Jianhui67 T★C 17:04, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) That's strange. I have never impersonated any other account or abused multiple accounts, but people have tried to impersonate me (possibly related to my being an admin on Simple English Wikipedia). I also don't think I've ever been on Wikitech until just now when I went (without logging in) to see what you were talking about. I see that the listing of "my" account on Wikitech is noted as "not attached"; are Wikitech accounts linked to the usual Wikimedia unified login? -- Auntof6 (talk) 17:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support O.k., thanks for the explanations. All the best --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per nominator and many others. Thank you for accepting the nomination Auntof6. -- Ooligan (talk) 05:10, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per wquar and ratekreel. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 00:35, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:53, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support - I actually promised a co-nomination but didn't make it here in time! Auntof6 has long been a voice of reason in CfDs and other gnoming areas, and clearly has the temperament for the mop. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral With only a handful of own uploads is difficult to support for me --A.Savin 10:22, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--UltimoGrimm (talk) 13:48, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 13:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support for sure --Mateus2019 (talk) 20:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Blessings to the new admin! --Tmv (talk) 07:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support yes, no doubt --Achim55 (talk) 07:31, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
- I'll vote when the nominee says they accept or not. Abzeronow (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: The candidate has accepted the nomination. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping, A1Cafel. Abzeronow (talk) 16:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: The candidate has accepted the nomination. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Useless bit of trivia Every successful RfA in at least the last three years has been a self-nomination. That has absolutely no bearing on this RfA; I was just surprised to see a non self-nom on this project. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Although I'll note that CptViraj's successful RfB was a non self-nom as well. Abzeronow (talk) 16:49, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Enhancing999 (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 11:35, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:Interface administrators, a request should be made here for users who seek interface admin rights even if they are non-admins.
There is a backlog at Category:Commons protected edit requests for interface administrators for weeks. Some requests are rather simple to deal with.
Accordingly, I propose to do them. I'm not interested in adminship in general. I'm currently a template editor and have edited countless templates.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 11:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Votes
- Oppose --A.Savin 15:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above and this unresolved discussion. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Feel free to reopen it, if you think it needs addressing.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 16:12, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Feel free to reopen it, if you think it needs addressing.
- Oppose See discussion below. Yann (talk) 16:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Nope. — regards, Revi 17:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm afraid I'm seeing the same behavior and approach from you as Günther Frager. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:31, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Multichill (talk) 17:42, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per the ANU, and no, I still don't care about the userpage (and I am still biased). Queen of Hearts (talk) 18:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Ternera (talk) 19:22, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. It is exceptionally rare for a user to be granted interface administrator rights without already being having administrator or greater rights - to the best of my knowledge, Lucas Werkmeister is currently the only exception - and I don't see a compelling explanation of why you should be the second. Omphalographer (talk) 20:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note that there have (AFAIK) been three non-admin IAs other than Werkmeister – FDMS4 passed in 2019 (went inactive 2 years later), Dschwen passed in 2021 (was full admin from 2007 to 2019; went inactive a year later), and Putnik (was full admin from 2007 to 2022, where he resigned admin but not IA; went inactive a year later). I believe that interface edit requests are quite backlogged and we should take anyone who is competent with technical stuff and doesn't have other issues even if they aren't an admin, but that's neither here nor there. Queen of Hearts (talk) 04:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose thanks, but no Bedivere (talk) 22:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per whatever has been said (logically). I would gladly support if there are better communications skills. Tech-knowledge itself is not sufficient. Regards, Aafi (talk) 13:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Günther failed becuase of his inability to accept community consensus on a very trivial matter, but this time, its just the icing on the cake. The ANU thread is concerning at best, the retaliatory DR is grounds for a 3 day block (as civility issue) by any uninvolved admin, and on top of all that, IA has the ability to edit pages that have global effects . IA is not a hat we give on a whim. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 01:18, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Aafi, tech knowledge by the candidate is not enough by itself, candidate doesn't appear have the temperament to be an admin. I will say that I don't believe the DR discussed was retaliatory. Abzeronow (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bastique ☎ let's talk! 01:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I have no skin in this game but have read through these comments and past discussion. I can't see a reason to support. Takerlamar (talk) 21:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sad to say that I cannot support a candidate with glaring existing issues. Jianhui67 T★C 11:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments
- I wonder why you haven't created a userpage yet. Please at least add a babel box to your talk page so we can know what languages you speak. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 13:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I can add whatever notice is needed on my talk page, similar to the approach by @Günther Frager. If not in English, I would try to handle requests in languages of the interface I'd be editing.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 16:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)- Well, you didn't reply to my concern about your userpage, and I just don't understand why it's so hard to create it. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- It appears for you to be somewhat relevant to editing the interface. Maybe you can explain how so and I will try to address your concerns.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)- By the way there is no such "Gunther Frager approach". Once he lost his candidacy he removed the Babel labels. Bedivere (talk) 22:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's weird that some users trouble candidates like Gunther with irrelevant issues in such requests. Wonder if it's systematic or just incidental.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 07:40, 26 November 2024 (UTC)- It's not irrelevant. Frager deliberately ignored our request giving poor excuses, which ultimately was the reason of our opposition. If you think disregarding consensus is irrelevant, makes me think Bedivere (talk) 20:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's unclear what consensus you refer to. If the issues users are being hassled with are irrelevant, ignoring is may be a good approach. Clearly nobody had troubles finding a language to communicate with Gunter.
- Obviously, if the issue implies spreading false information, actions eventually need to be taken. We can't have admin doing that repeatedly and apparently knowingly. Admins consistently ignoring discussed, agreed-upon and written policy is a no go.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 22:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's not irrelevant. Frager deliberately ignored our request giving poor excuses, which ultimately was the reason of our opposition. If you think disregarding consensus is irrelevant, makes me think Bedivere (talk) 20:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's weird that some users trouble candidates like Gunther with irrelevant issues in such requests. Wonder if it's systematic or just incidental.
- By the way there is no such "Gunther Frager approach". Once he lost his candidacy he removed the Babel labels. Bedivere (talk) 22:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- It appears for you to be somewhat relevant to editing the interface. Maybe you can explain how so and I will try to address your concerns.
- Well, you didn't reply to my concern about your userpage, and I just don't understand why it's so hard to create it. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I can add whatever notice is needed on my talk page, similar to the approach by @Günther Frager. If not in English, I would try to handle requests in languages of the interface I'd be editing.
- Question Why aren't you interested in adminship? Since you want to help with the backlog at this specific category, why didn't you apply for adminship first in order to help with other backlogs like deletion requests and then work your way up? Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Admins can't actually deal with these matters, they need to apply for that too. Besides, from editing to fix templates, it's rather a way down, at least technically.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 16:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)- I do know that and what I asked was why you didn't think it'd be better to apply for adminship first and help admins with the backlogs for a while and then ask for these advanced permissions to also help with the edit requests for interface administrators. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm trying to solve an issue I'm interested in. Solving some other issue wont get these done.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 17:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)- You could make your requests if that's the purpose Bedivere (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can you explain the meaning and relevancy of your comment, if there is any?
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 07:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)- "I'm trying to solve an issue I'm interested in". You can make your request and have somebody else solve it. Bedivere (talk) 20:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The proposal is made here. Are you suggesting I should just add requests on project chat and or admin noticeboard and ping interface admins?
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 22:28, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The proposal is made here. Are you suggesting I should just add requests on project chat and or admin noticeboard and ping interface admins?
- "I'm trying to solve an issue I'm interested in". You can make your request and have somebody else solve it. Bedivere (talk) 20:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can you explain the meaning and relevancy of your comment, if there is any?
- You could make your requests if that's the purpose Bedivere (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm trying to solve an issue I'm interested in. Solving some other issue wont get these done.
- I do know that and what I asked was why you didn't think it'd be better to apply for adminship first and help admins with the backlogs for a while and then ask for these advanced permissions to also help with the edit requests for interface administrators. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Admins can't actually deal with these matters, they need to apply for that too. Besides, from editing to fix templates, it's rather a way down, at least technically.
- I'm inclined to oppose because there is no user page, but I'll give it a few days... No other concerns at the moment. Bedivere (talk) 14:48, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Same here, but I'm waiting for their reply to see what they have to say. It's really unfortunate they don't have a user page just like the previous user whose request was unsuccessful for the very same reason. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You should at the very least mention this, where several users agreed that you need a block. What did you learn about this? Yann (talk) 15:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- The matter was discussed a bit further at Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#c-Clindberg-20241027012000-Giftzwerg_88-20241026204400 and @Clindberg seems to disagree about your view on current written policy. Maybe you want to participate in the discussion there.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 16:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)- We are not discussing policies here. Yann (talk) 16:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- It appears that your view, actions and conduct in that matter is not compatible with what Clindberg considers Commons' discussed, agreed-upon and written policy.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 16:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- It appears that your view, actions and conduct in that matter is not compatible with what Clindberg considers Commons' discussed, agreed-upon and written policy.
- We are not discussing policies here. Yann (talk) 16:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Now created a retaliation deletion request. Yann (talk) 08:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- That's a real shame. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 08:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- From my experience, I can't trust Yann to address or correct false information.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)- If you can't trust an experienced and trustworthy admin, then the community won't trust you with the IA rights either. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 07:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- From my experience, I can't trust Yann to address or correct false information.
- That's a real shame. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 08:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The matter was discussed a bit further at Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#c-Clindberg-20241027012000-Giftzwerg_88-20241026204400 and @Clindberg seems to disagree about your view on current written policy. Maybe you want to participate in the discussion there.
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.