Commons:Deletion requests/File:M10 Wolverine of 628th TDs in Dreux.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken from a book. Source website does not say if picture is taken by a US military on duty or for personal hobby or by a French civilian Teofilo (talk) 07:21, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep http://www.5ad.org/pics/norman34.html does not look like a French "Frenchmen with liberators" picture. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
US president F.D. Roosevelt disliked the Free French. Would a US army signal corps photographer have dared to keep a picture with Free French insigna ? Is it not easier to imagine that the same person who wrote the insigna on the wall is the person who took the picture ? Teofilo (talk) 14:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. No evidence for a US military image given. High Contrast (talk) 19:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This closure was premature, see User talk:High Contrast#Very fast deletion. This request is reopened and will stay open for 7 days. Unless someone finds a source supporting the US military claim, it will be deleted. Multichill (talk) 09:22, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reopening this. Shimgray (talk) 21:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I gave this matter some thought when I first uploaded the image; as Teofilo spotted, it's not quite obvious what the license should be. It's not explicitly labeled with an author; none of the images in that set are, sadly. Some are "personal" photographs, of named people; some are more clearly "stock" photographs (this, for example, I recognise). My strong feeling is that, on the balance of probabilities, it was taken by a US soldier on active duty; the argument that only a Frenchman would be likely to use a Free French poster as a backdrop is a bit hard to take seriously! I do accept it's not possible to be absolutely sure, because there's no clear image captioning in the source; so be it.
However, I've dug around a bit more, and found something interesting. The image is a digitised copy taken from the book Paths of armor, published 1950. Per this chart, we see that a work published in 1950 with a copyright notice would need renewing; the renewal would be due in 1977 or 1978 per here. I've dug through the renewal records for 1977/1978, and failed to find anything. I'm not clear if this would directly impact the copyright status of the image - does it only count if published in its own right? - but the lack of a renewal notice certainly seems worth thinking about. Shimgray (talk) 21:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, per Shimgray. Kameraad Pjotr 21:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]