User talk:PaleoGeekSquared

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PaleoGeekSquared!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asia spinosaurid tooth (KDC-PV-0003).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 02:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok american spinosaurid

[edit]

Dude the american spinosaurid is torvosaurus https://paleobiodb.org/classic/checkTaxonInfo?taxon_no=38595&is_real_user=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubblesorg (talk • contribs) 18:24, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baryonyx holotype ulna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 21:57, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spinosaurus skeletal reconstruction.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

[edit]

Dear PaleoGeekSquared,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

[edit]
We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
Dear PaleoGeekSquared,
Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your sounds for the FS Tag.
You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now.
-- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 20:51, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Inaccurate_Baryonyx_restorations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


IJReid (talk) 00:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Inaccurate_Irritator_restorations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


IJReid (talk) 00:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Inaccurate_Suchomimus_restorations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


IJReid (talk) 00:19, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was trying to add the {{Flickrreview}} template to File:Ichthyovenator laosensis tail vertebrae NMNS.jpg but the link takes me to a different picture, and I can't find this photo in the photoset. Would you mind correcting the link? Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:08, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's the correct link, it is just zoomed in on the vertebrae of the tail, with a dark background and reordered. FunkMonk (talk) 13:13, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ytoyoda, that has also just reminded me there's a template one's supposed to use to clarify if the image has been altered in such a way. I've just added it to the two images of the mount[1][2].
I see it now, thanks for clarifying. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ichthyovenator laosensis skeletal reconstruction by PaleoGeek.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marianiftode1 (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]