User talk:GraemeL: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Bonniegrrl - "→Bonnie Burton: new section" |
m →ArbCom 2019 special circular: Task 24: button update following a TFD |
||
(33 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=1 September 2021}} |
|||
{{administrator}} |
{{administrator}} |
||
<!--{{tinc|top=0.5}}--> |
<!--{{tinc|top=0.5}}--> |
||
Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
<big> |
<big> |
||
<span class="plainlinks"> |
<span class="plainlinks"> |
||
[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit§ion=new}} < |
[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit§ion=new}} <span style="color:yellow;">Please click here to start a new topic.</span>] |
||
</span> |
</span> |
||
</big> |
</big> |
||
Line 43: | Line 44: | ||
[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|oldid=355048247}} 16] | |
[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|oldid=355048247}} 16] | |
||
[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|oldid=464974774}} 17] | |
[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|oldid=464974774}} 17] | |
||
[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|oldid=571011783}} 18] |
[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|oldid=571011783}} 18] | |
||
[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|oldid=806240507}} 19] |
|||
</span> |
</span> |
||
<!--End archives--> |
<!--End archives--> |
||
Line 49: | Line 51: | ||
__TOC__ |
__TOC__ |
||
== |
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message == |
||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, GraemeL. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
Greetings, |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
I'm contacting you to ask if we may recreate Genese Davis' wiki page. It appears it was originally created prematurely but as seen in the news over the past 6 months she's released a new novel and making waves in the video game and writing industry. She's appeared in Publishers Weekly, Jace Hall, and Getty images has begun following her appearances. She's on her national book tour and in the works to publisher her novel in Germany. Below are many links referring to her contributions thus far. Thank you for your consideration. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
[[User:Ericd83|Ericd83]] ([[User talk:Ericd83|talk]]) 08:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Ericd83 |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=813406758 --> |
|||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == |
|||
http://genesedavis.com |
|||
http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/columns-and-blogs/soapbox/article/55556-overcoming-the-ya-obsession.html |
|||
http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/genese-davis-attends-wondercon-anaheim-2013-day-2-at-news-photo/165116264 |
|||
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szn74kDH3Fc&list=PL7vq8vK778kiCQiPBghqVW07tJrUHcp_9&index=1 |
|||
http://www.jacehallshow.com/news/interviews/gaming-personality/20130301/the-holders-dominion-literature-meets-mmorpgs/ |
|||
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soBKjj_Y-R8 |
|||
http://geeksmash.com/books/author-interview-genese-davis-the-holders-dominion567 |
|||
http://article.wn.com/view/2013/09/07/Genese_Davis_brings_her_video_gaming_journey_to_life_in_The_/#/related_news |
|||
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHIATXSRW2s&list=PL7vq8vK778kgLsvIn-WuwX6gfEHrnAUBm |
|||
http://www.mmorpg.com/features.cfm/view/columns/show/51_Genese-Davis |
|||
http://kerrydwyer.net/2013/04/19/interview-with-genese-davis-author-of-the-holders-dominion/ |
|||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, GraemeL. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
== Credit bureau page update == |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
Hi! Was there any problem with my update of the Credit bureau page? Thanks for your reply. Martin maxa |
|||
:I didn't a problem with your edit itself, it was just that reviewing your change made me see a deterioration of the section over time with red links and external links. The section is for major credit reporting agencies which should all have their own articles. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 14:42, 23 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Alright, I see. I was doing some research about credit reporting agencies and saw that Creditinfo is in much more countries than reported. And, of course, Creditinfo does not have its own article. So maybe if I create Creditinfo article (it is the direct competition of Experian, Equifax and TrnsUnion) we can add the countries where Creditinfo is? Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Martin maxa|Martin maxa]] ([[User talk:Martin maxa|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Martin maxa|contribs]]) 14:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Yup, once the article is there, adding it to the list for countries it operates in is fine. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 14:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== My reverted changes == |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=866998124 --> |
|||
== ArbCom 2019 special circular == |
|||
Hi Graeme, |
|||
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;"> |
|||
Sorry I didn't put why I deleted the content. The information was removed because it was misleading and incorrect. ACT Alberta deals with ALL forms of human trafficking, and the information on the page makes it look like it deals primarily with sexual exploitation. Further, ACT absolutely does NOT see johns as the main problem behind human trafficking. ACT Alberta also does not use the term sexual slaves. Lara Quarterman also no longer works for ACT Alberta - that is quite out of date. |
|||
{| |
|||
|valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em 1em 0 0.25em;"| [[File:Warning sign font awesome.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle]] |
|||
|<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''Administrators [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Security|must]] secure their accounts'''</span> |
|||
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. |
|||
* Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email |
|||
* [[Special:ChangePassword|Change your password now]] if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, [https://haveibeenpwned.com/Passwords exposed], or weak |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:User_account_security#Two-factor authentication (2FA)|Enable two-factor authentication now]] for improved security |
|||
|} |
|||
<span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular">{{clickable button 2|1=View additional information|link=no}}</span> |
|||
</div><div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none"> |
|||
<div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;"> |
|||
{| style="border-left: 3px solid black; padding-left: 1em;" |
|||
Further, the information I added is correct information regarding what ACT Alberta stands for, it's mission, etc. as found on its website. |
|||
|{{null}} |
|||
; Why have I received this message? |
|||
: All administrators are receiving it. |
|||
; What prompted you to send this message? |
|||
Can you please reinstate my changes? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:ACTAB|ACTAB]] ([[User talk:ACTAB|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ACTAB|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|||
: Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were [[WP:LEVEL1|desysopped on an emergency basis]]. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh [[WP:RFA|Request for Adminship (RfA)]] after losing control of their account. |
|||
:I reverted them purely because you removed a large section of text without leaving an [[WP:ES|edit summary]] explaining why the text had been removed, so it looked indistinguishable from vandalism. Feel free to make the change again yourself, but this time include a description of why you're removing the text in question. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
; What do I need to do? |
|||
== Answering your Alert / Warning == |
|||
: Only to follow the instructions in this message. |
|||
:# Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). |
|||
:# Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). |
|||
:# Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. |
|||
; How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? |
|||
Dear Mr Graemel, |
|||
: You can find out more about 2FA at [[m:2FA]]. |
|||
|}</div> |
|||
</div> |
|||
<small>This message was sent to all administrators following a [[Special:Permalink/891851004#Return of permissions for compromised administrator accounts|recent motion]]. Thank you for your attention. For the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]], [[User:Cameron11598|Cameron11598]] 02:28, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> |
|||
I receive your alert and take it seriously, the "External Link" I provide was : |
|||
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular --> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> |
|||
<!-- --> |
|||
== Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) == |
|||
- Covering the topics |
|||
- Non commercial (no advertising, adsense, etc... on our Blog) |
|||
- Pure exclusive quality content made by reputable journalist |
|||
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community. |
|||
*blog.dreamchrono.com/2013/10/panerai-radiomir-8-days-gmt/ |
|||
*blog.dreamchrono.com/2013/10/mbf-horological-machines/ |
|||
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Security|required]] to "have strong passwords and [[Wikipedia:Personal security practices|follow appropriate personal security practices]]." We have [[Special:Permalink/891851004#Return of permissions for compromised administrator accounts|updated]] our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, [[WP:2FA|two-factor authentication]] remains an ''optional'' means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised. |
|||
If these are not relevant, then I will stop doing it. |
|||
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. |
|||
But I assume you receive lot of Spam from commercial product and probably remove them right away without even check. That's why I take the time to answer your warning. |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, -[[User:Cameron11598|Cameron11598]] 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> |
|||
I will wait for your answer. |
|||
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular correction --> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:Ncv3nx.png]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The file [[:File:Ncv3nx.png]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
Best Regards, |
|||
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> |
|||
Romain Brabant - DreamChrono Ltd |
|||
<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Romain at DreamChrono|Romain at DreamChrono]] ([[User talk:Romain at DreamChrono|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Romain at DreamChrono|contribs]]) 12:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Your username shows that you are connected with the site that you're trying to link to and your only actions so far have been adding external links to that site. Whether the site is commercial or not is irrelevant. If you have expertise in the area of time pieces, please consider adding content to the articles instead of external links. |
|||
:Thanks. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 12:09, 24 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
== Responding to an antisemitic comment with a refutation is a violation of arbitration == |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[File talk:Ncv3nx.png|the file's talk page]]. |
|||
Did you even check the thread out? It is antisemitic to call Israel apartheid (indeed, this is actually a legal claim (since apartheid is defined in codified international law) under international law, so it also amounts to a libel), by the EU working definition of anti-semitism, and to any fair-minded person who simply looks at the facts. It's not fair to punish me for responding to a bigot. (My point was that surely if so many europeans believe that israel is a genocidal apartheid state, then it's clear why they might think it's the greatest threat to world peace, but both of these propositions are self-evidently absurd by simply opening one's eyes. So for him to push a ridiculous libel like that, I found the need to respond with evidence. [[Special:Contributions/174.44.174.192|174.44.174.192]] ([[User talk:174.44.174.192|talk]]) 17:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I did read the thread and I have zero interest in you throwing around legal terms. If you continue to post to talk pages in a manner that is considered uncivil by community standards I will block you without further warning. Moderate your tone or be blocked, the choice is entirely yours. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 17:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::The IP has apparently made their choice. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAnti-Zionism&diff=582159476&oldid=579935528] and pretty much all of their recent comments. They are starting fires all over the place. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Sean.hoyland|<font color="#000">Sean.hoyland</font>]]''' - '''[[User talk:Sean.hoyland|talk]]'''</small> 11:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion|files for discussion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> |
|||
== Affiliate reference == |
|||
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the [[Help:Page history|page history]] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, [[User:FastilyBot|FastilyBot]] ([[User talk:FastilyBot|talk]]) 01:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC) |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skrill&curid=1429860&diff=578598088&oldid=578597714 Good call]. I removed a similar link from the infobox, but didn't really recognise the significance of why they were putting it in there in the first place. Your edit summary made things much clearer. <span style="font-family: sansation, sans-serif;">'''[[User:AJCham|<span style="color: #000;">AJ</span>]][[User talk:AJCham|<span style="color: #666;">Cham</span>]]'''</span> 00:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I had passed over the anon's change earlier on my watchlist without comment, but seeing your edit summary mentioning dubious links made me go back and take another look. Call it teamwork. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 10:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Administrators will no longer be [[WP:AUTOP|autopatrolled]] == |
|||
== Blocked proxies == |
|||
A [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/2021_review/Proposals#Passed:_7D_Remove_autopatrolled_from_default_toolkit|recently closed]] Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove [[WP:Autopatrolled|Autopatrolled]] from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with [[WP:EFM|Edit Filter Manager]], choose to [[Special:UserRights/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|self-assign]] this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Administrators_will_no_longer_be_autopatrolled|Administrator's Noticeboard]]. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
I noticed you blocked [[special:contributions/213.110.195.249|213.110.195.249]] as an open proxy, but you made it anon only. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think even registered users should be editing through proxies for sockpuppeteering reasons. Is there any specific reason you anonblock open proxies? [[User:Ginsuloft|Ginsuloft]] ([[User talk:Ginsuloft|talk]]) 13:27, 25 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=1058184441 --> |
|||
:Force of habit making anon blocks soft. I've changed it to a hard block. Thanks for pointing it out. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 13:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== How we will see unregistered users == |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for October 26== |
|||
<section begin=content/> |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Yacht charter]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Tipping]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Yacht_charter|check to confirm]] | [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Yacht_charter|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
Hi! |
|||
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki. |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 11:50, 26 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I for one welcome our robotic overlords. (Fixed the link) --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 12:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed. |
|||
== KURUDAMANNIL == |
|||
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin '''will still be able to access the IP'''. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on [[m:IP Editing: Privacy Enhancement and Abuse Mitigation/Improving tools|better tools]] to help. |
|||
When you salted [[KURUDAMANNIL]], you set it to the wrong protection level. Can you adjust it to sysop? Thanks, [[User:Jackmcbarn|Jackmcbarn]] ([[User talk:Jackmcbarn|talk]]) 13:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}}. It's now protected from rogue template editors. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 14:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
If you have not seen it before, you can [[m:IP Editing: Privacy Enhancement and Abuse Mitigation|read more on Meta]]. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can [[m:Global message delivery/Targets/Tech ambassadors|subscribe]] to [[m:Tech/News|the weekly technical newsletter]]. |
|||
==Al Lemos== |
|||
I'm open to discussions, Al Lemos aren't, he just reverts me, don't read nothing that I've putted in the articles, ignore my sources and, bam, full revert. Where I can ask for an adiministrator to block him, if he continues with this type of thing, before 3 days? This user just wants to block me, and I don't want to do any edition war. [[User:Rauzaruku|Rauzaruku]] ([[User talk:Rauzaruku|talk]]) 14:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:The [[WP:AN3|edit warring noticeboard]] is the place to report edit warring. Please make sure you attempt to use the article talk pages to attempt to engage the other user in dialogue before taking your issues there. Post to the talk page why you think his/her edits are wrong and what you want to see in the article and the do your revert and add something like "''Reverted changes by <user>, please see the talk page''" to your edit summary. I know you both had a little bit of back and forth on your own user talk pages, but the correct place for attempting to resolve these problems is on the talk page of the article where the dispute is taking place. |
|||
We have [[m:IP Editing: Privacy Enhancement and Abuse Mitigation#IP Masking Implementation Approaches (FAQ)|two suggested ways]] this identity could work. '''We would appreciate your feedback''' on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can [[m:Talk:IP Editing: Privacy Enhancement and Abuse Mitigation|let us know on the talk page]]. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January. |
|||
:You might also want to look at [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] for some less disruptive ways to resolve edit warring. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 14:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Thank you. |
|||
::I put notices in the three discussion pages of the articles to which he is reverting me. See if it is not good. I never tryed to stop him from change my editions, since he justify anything. But he doesn't justify anything, just makes total reversal and scold me. [[User:Rauzaruku|Rauzaruku]] ([[User talk:Rauzaruku|talk]]) 14:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
/[[m:User:Johan (WMF)|Johan (WMF)]]<section end=content/> |
|||
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::That makes a good start. Now we wait and see if he's interested in talking or just going about blind reverting. Reaching out on the talk pages gives you a better position if he just comes back and reverts without talking. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 14:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Johan_(WMF)/Target_lists/Admins2022(3)&oldid=22532499 --> |
|||
== New administrator activity requirement == |
|||
Discuss the content of a disputed article on the talk page of the same should be the first step. What we have seen here, however, has been an editor (Rauzaruku) trying to impose his biased point of view by force, without warning. A treacherous and cowardly attack. The name for this type of action is "[[WP:DE|disruptive editing]]." And what you, the administrator, proposes? That both sides go to discuss on the talk page. OK. I will do so, provided that: |
|||
a) the offender makes a formal apology for his actions; |
|||
b) the articles [[Partido da Imprensa Golpista]], [[Instituto Millenium]] and [[Rodrigo Constantino]] be reversed to the latest valid edition before the bullie's intervention; |
|||
c) that the offender be warned that he will be punished if he persists in his destabilizing behaviour ([[cyberstalking]] and [[cyberbullying]]). |
|||
I don't believe that he will accept any of my three propositions, so here comes a warning: <i>I will continue to create articles about topics that I consider relevant to the people of my country.</i> I will not lower my head for a rented [[Bullying|bullie]]. As for Wikipedia, if you allow that a user continue such destabilizing behaviour, you will be endorsing a "official" world view, where inconvenient truths can not be told - <i>even if they have reliable sources</i>. |
|||
So, what to do to resolve this stalemate? My suggestion is to assign someone not involved in the discussion, who knows the subject matter and who is neutral, to decide on the validity of the versions presented by both sides. I know that it is not easy, but I believe that with good will, this can be achieved. - [[User:Al Lemos|Al Lemos]] ([[User talk:Al Lemos|talk]]) 16:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I've warned you both about edit warring and was technically allowed to block you both for breaking the [[WP:3RR|3RR]] already. I chose to try and get you both talking instead of taking that action. |
|||
:Administrators always protect the [[:m:WRONG|wrong version]] in order to annoy all of the involved editors. Seriously though, I protected the version that was current at the time of my actions, reverting the article would have prevented me from protecting it as I would have then been involved in the dispute. |
|||
:You have both been warned about disruptive editing. If there are two opposing views that both have reliable sources, the article has space for covering both of those views. If only one view has reliable sources, then that is the only one that should be in the article. |
|||
:If you are not able to resolve your dispute on the talk pages of the articles, you might try one of several options available at the [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] page. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Al Lemos is confusing things. I'm open to discussion, not to submission. It makes no sense I apologize for something that is my right, edit articles. Don't have any sense I revert all the editing I did, because I added valid sources and issues related to articles he should have put, information that he knows, but he not putted because personally did not matter to him putting. I've complemented the article and he sees this as wrong , and he still asks me to remove my text, because he wants to hide relevant information. He thinks every point of view contrary to him is biased. Wikipedia articles must cite facts, and not , add pieces of information to create a false conclusion / unreal / invented / unproven things ; should not create articles with only a little information to justify a huge section of controversy , to try to defame the subject of the article. Unfortunately Al Lemos do not know for that Wikipedia serves, and purposely ignores the rules . It will be very difficult to me, and to other users, edit those articles, while he imposing absurd things like these. He acts like the Wiki Emperor, and in his mind I should kneel and kiss his feet. [[User:Rauzaruku|Rauzaruku]] ([[User talk:Rauzaruku|talk]]) 17:10, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::It's quite obvious that he will continue to create articles because his intention here is more than clear, after all he has said: create pages that are apparently within the rules, but always with undue weight, saying little to the article themselves, and trying to always put the largest possible section of controversy on the subject. Anyone who knows the issues that he edits, will know that he is not putting even half of what exists on the subject, and purposely hiding much relevant information. In short, Al Lemos only creates items with addiction intention. I know I sound like an annoying talking so much, but the reality is this: it would be better for Wikipedia that Al Lemos was blocked, then a real neutral editor could create these articles, certainly much better than his current... since Al Lemos is far from neutral. [[User:Rauzaruku|Rauzaruku]] ([[User talk:Rauzaruku|talk]]) 17:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
{{ivmbox|The administrator policy has been updated with new [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural_removal_for_inactive_administrators|activity requirements]] following a successful [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Request for comment on administrator activity requirements|Request for Comment]]. |
|||
::::Yes, reverting to his version isn't going to happen at least until the protection expires, or some consensus is arrived at that will enable a protected edit to get the article into an agreed upon state. I am starting to get the feeling that he has a problem with [[WP:OWN|owning]] articles. Again, I would suggest that you take the problem to [[WP:DR]] as the options there are usually looked at by editors with extensive of experience in sorting out problems of this sort. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 17:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Sure. I'm open to discussions (healthy, not mad) and I want the articles have only reliable text. I'll wait to see what Al Lemos will do, first. I'm not here to fight, I want to create swimming articles. [[User:Rauzaruku|Rauzaruku]] ([[User talk:Rauzaruku|talk]]) 17:44, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have: |
|||
{{anchor|portugal}} |
|||
#Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR |
|||
:I want to tell you something very serious: Al Lemos fled to Portuguese Wikipedia, began to create the same partial articles he created here (after ten months without editing NOTHING at Pt-Wiki), and he still calling an administrator of Wiki PT to chase me, look this: https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usu%C3%A1rio_Discuss%C3%A3o:Lord_Mota&diff=prev&oldid=37200825. And in his words, I'm doing cyberbullying and harassment... He is so angry with me, that is trying to block me anyway, by cross-wiki harassment. He is mocking your request to talk on the talk page of the articles, and trying to prove a point of view. I pray earnestly that user need to be blocked in all Wikipedias by cross-wiki vandalism. This is totally unacceptable. [[User:Rauzaruku|Rauzaruku]] ([[User talk:Rauzaruku|talk]]) 01:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
#Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period |
|||
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work. |
|||
== copyrights violation == |
|||
}} |
|||
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=All_administrators&oldid=1082922312 --> |
|||
{{You've got mail}} [[User:SilkTork|SilkTork]] ([[User talk:SilkTork|talk]]) 01:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC) |
|||
hi GraemeL, |
|||
{{-}} |
|||
I understand that you rejected the article based upon its similarity to other article on net, |
|||
please let me help me understand if i repost the same info but under my own words then will it be published. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Testarosagpr|Testarosagpr]] ([[User talk:Testarosagpr|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Testarosagpr|contribs]]) 11:30, 28 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:If you had used your own words, the article as it stood still wouldn't have met the Wikipedia standards for the [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|notability for companies]]. If you feel that the company meets those guidelines, please include [[WP:REF|references]] to back up the claims. Doing so makes it more likely that your article will be accepted by the article for creation reviewers. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 11:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== October 2013 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=579267660 your edit] to [[US Error Coins]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:US Error Coins|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page]. |
|||
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: |
|||
*<nowiki>unsourced|date=October 2013}</nowiki>{{red|'''}'''}}<nowiki></nowiki> |
|||
Thanks, <!-- (0, 0, -1, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 12:16, 29 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}}. Thanks, BracketBot! |
|||
== About Eivissa/Ibiza == |
|||
''Ibiza'' is the name for the island in Spanish, and ''Eivissa'' is the name for the island in Catalan. The people of the island (before the huge Spanish immigration) speak Catalan, so ''Eivissa'' is the name for the language. |
|||
I think a Catalan understands better than you that problem. :) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Polete 98|Polete 98]] ([[User talk:Polete 98|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Polete 98|contribs]]) 19:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Ibiza is the article name and the name used in English, per [[WP:ENGLISH]] it should be used in the article with mention made of the local versions of the name. That was the format that the article was in before you decided to change it to Catalan. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 19:59, 29 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Local? Catalan language is a spoken by 7 milion people and 13 milion understand it. Why do you take the name for the island in Spanish (a foreign language in Eivissa) and not the local name? Would you like that, for example, England, in stead of called like that was called Angleterre? |
|||
--[[User:Polete 98|Polete 98]] [[User_talk:Polete 98|talk)]] 20:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I've no idea why the original decision was made to use the Spanish name and not the Catalan name and the answer is probably lost in the mists of time. I'm actually from [[Scotland]], which is [[:ES:Skotlando|Skotlando]] on the Spanish wikipedia and [[:ca:Escòcia|Escòcia]] in Catalan. If you look at those articles, you'll see the same format. They use their common name most of the time and only mention that it's Scotland in English. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 20:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Social Network Analysis == |
|||
I understand. We're both busy and we're both pros. This IS my field, and I'm puzzled by your rollbacks. I await your reasoning. PS: Might be better to have the convo on the [[Social Network Analysis]] talk page. [[User:Bellagio99|Bellagio99]] ([[User talk:Bellagio99|talk]]) 23:51, 29 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for November 2== |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Ecotourism in the United States]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[Haw]] and [[Bluestem]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ecotourism_in_the_United_States|check to confirm]] | [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ecotourism_in_the_United_States|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:21, 2 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Al Lemos unreliable contributions== |
|||
Notice what a partial user can do, how much he wants to force a point of view. Al Lemos puts as a source in the article [[Maílson da Nóbrega]], a magazine completely unknown in Brazil, called "Brasileiros magazine", so I made a request in the Guild of Copy Editors to review the article, criticizing this source. Al Lemos is nuzzling my edits, and to justify the placement of this preposterous source, a magazine totally unknown to the 200 million Brazilians who have tiny drawing of 20,000 copies (here, neighborhood newspaper circulation has more than that), he goes and creates an article on the magazine, [[Brasileiros (magazine)]], thinking that it makes reliable source. Immediately, someone putted a notability tag. I've asked before to block Al Lemos, and I'm asking again. This user only tries to circumvent the rules and edit furtively enjoying that nobody is paying attention to him. [[User:Rauzaruku|Rauzaruku]] ([[User talk:Rauzaruku|talk]]) 12:51, 3 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Now, Wikipedia has assigned a ''personal censor'' to me? This turned to be a kind of [[Stasi]]? - [[User:Al Lemos|Al Lemos]] ([[User talk:Al Lemos|talk]]) 14:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::I would like to see you using that excuse for when an administrator starts to analyze the actions of a member to banish him. [[User:Rauzaruku|Rauzaruku]] ([[User talk:Rauzaruku|talk]]) 15:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Hey GraemeL. An edit I suggested was removed and I would like more information. == |
|||
Hello GraemeL |
|||
You removed an edit I had made and I would like some more feedback. |
|||
You said that my site probably wasn't fit for an encyclopedia. Please let me know why, and how I can be a site fit for an encyclopedia. We have a huge survival training section of our site currently in development where we, industry experts, and survival businessmen will all be making post, writing articles, and answering questions. Is this fit for WikiPedia? |
|||
Please get back with me and let me know - I prefer to be reached by email as I am constantly in my email Brandon@ReadyToGoSurvival.com <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/74.136.137.164|74.136.137.164]] ([[User talk:74.136.137.164|talk]]) 19:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Since GraemeL hasn't replied: Adding external links to companies selling related products is usually not a useful way to contribute to Wikipedia. See [[WP:SPAM]]. -- [[user:intgr|intgr]] <small>[[user talk:intgr|[talk]]]</small> 20:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="text-align: center;"> |
|||
<div style="border-style: solid; border-color: blue; background-color: Red; border-width: 1px; text-align: center; padding: 8px 8px 0; display: inline-block;" class="plainlinks">[[File:Bishzilla blink santa rotated.gif|left]][[File:Darwinbish bearing gift.png|right|135px]] |
|||
[[File:Darwin fish santa.png|right|75px]] |
|||
<p style="font-size: 200%; color: White; margin: 0.2em 0 0;">Season's greetings from Santa and her little helpers</p> |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
</div> |
|||
</div> |
|||
== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == |
|||
== Request for comment == |
|||
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by {{noping|Anna Frodesiak}}. Your comments [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab)#Pre-RfA_opinion_page|here]] is very much appreciated. Many thanks. [[User:Jim Cartar|Jim Carter]] through [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Jim Cartar@enwiki using the list at //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_administrators --> |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
== A Call to Action == |
|||
Established [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|policy]] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. |
|||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators]]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard|the bureaucrats' noticeboard]]. |
|||
Hello, I have picked you pretty much at random but I liked your style too. I belong to a UK progressive Catholic organization called A Call to Action, and I suggested to them that there ought to be a Wikipedia article on it. I wrote it (very short) in consultation at first with them but soon realized it was not very objective and rewrote. First the first it attracted a great deal of adverse comment and suggestions of deletion from right-wing Catholics. The administrator Mogdewani (sorry will find proper name ) welcomed me but -- to be frank-- soon revealed himself to be an ally of the opponents (sounds paranoid, but eg he praised the Latin Mass Society). I know there is no point in accusations of bias but I did copy out and save some of his comments, and they do reveal bias) Mog began by saying lack of notability, then said not neutral, then said conflict of interest --although I am neither an employee nor an agent of the organization). The majority were for deletion, although there were also strong opposing voices. With no notice to me it was then deleted -- I can't even find the date. I am I admit a real novice on here and not even good at the formatting, but I had a bit of help. I have now found that it was deleted by Slakr -- I can find no comments by him and ho deletion summary. Any suggestions welcome and sorry if I am troubling you. [[User:Tomcapa1|Tomcapa1]] ([[User talk:Tomcapa1|talk]]) 15:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— [[User:JJMC89 bot|JJMC89 '''bot''']] 00:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Scottish Fairground Culture Editathon == |
|||
== Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == |
|||
Hey there! As a Wikipedian in Scotland I thought you might be interested in the [[wmuk:Scottish fairground culture editathon|Scottish Fairground Culture editathon]] taking place on 7 May at the Riverside Museum - drop me a line if you'd like to know more! [[User:Lirazelf|Lirazelf]] ([[User talk:Lirazelf|talk]]) 10:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC) |
|||
: Oh dear, linkfail! Here's the correct one... [[wmuk:Scottish Fairground Culture Editathon|Scottish Fairground Culture Editathon]] [[User:Lirazelf|Lirazelf]] ([[User talk:Lirazelf|talk]]) 10:12, 14 April 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Established [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|policy]] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> |
|||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators]]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard|the bureaucrats' noticeboard]]. |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— [[User:JJMC89 bot|JJMC89 '''bot''']] 00:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> |
|||
== Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == |
|||
== Bonnie Burton == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Established [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|policy]] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed. |
|||
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at [[WP:BN]]. |
|||
I'm not sure if I'm doing this correctly, but I got some sort of block/warning just for adding a book to my author page on Wikipedia. |
|||
I wasn't spamming or using this as a resume. Other authors have their books listed, so I just wanted to add my own book. |
|||
Now that I know I cannot alter my own Wiki page, I will no longer do so. |
|||
Sorry for the misunderstanding. ;-) |
|||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 00:06, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
- Bonnie Burton <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bonniegrrl|Bonniegrrl]] ([[User talk:Bonniegrrl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bonniegrrl|contribs]]) 08:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Latest revision as of 15:04, 4 March 2024
This user may have left Wikipedia. GraemeL has not edited Wikipedia since 1 September 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
This is GraemeL's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to him.
- I will reply here unless you ask me to reply somewhere else.
- If I posted something (other than a warning) to your talk page, I probably added it to my watch list. I would prefer replies in the same page as the original post. However, feel free to reply here if you want.
- If I missed an update on your talk page, please poke me with {{Talkback|your username}} on this page.
I am: OUT
Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
18 November 2024 |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, GraemeL. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, GraemeL. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
[edit]Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:28, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
[edit]ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Ncv3nx.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
[edit]A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
[edit]Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
[edit]The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
SilkTork (talk) 01:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux Talk 00:06, 1 October 2022 (UTC)