Encrusted Pottery culture: Difference between revisions

Encrusted Pottery culture
Geographical range	Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Romania
Period	Bronze Age
Dates	ca. 2000 BC - 14th century BC
Preceded by	Kisapostag culture, Vucedol culture, Somogyvár-Vinkovci culture, Vatin culture
Followed by	Tumulus culture, Belegiš culture, Urnfield culture

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 16:43, 3 August 2024

The Encrusted Pottery culture was an archaeological culture of the Early to Middle Bronze Age (c. 2000-1400 BC) originating in the Transdanubian region of western Hungary.^[1]^[2] It emerged from the Kisapostag culture, which was preceded by the Somogyvár-Vinkovci culture.^[3] The Encrusted Pottery culture expanded eastwards and southwards along the Danube into parts of Croatia, Serbia, Romania and Bulgaria in response to migrations from the northwest by the Tumulus culture, resulting in the emergence of groups such as Dubovác–Žuto Brdo in Serbia and Gârla Mare–Cârna in Romania, which are considered to be southern manifestations of the Encrusted Pottery culture.^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7] The culture was named after its distinctive pottery decorated with incised designs inlaid with white lime, and southern groups are notable for the production of figurines or idols decorated in the same style. Stylistic similarities have also been noted between Encrusted Pottery artefacts and artefacts from Mycenaean Greece.^[8]^[9]

Genetic profile

Four Y-DNA testings from the Balatonkeresztúr mass grave burial dated to the Encrusted Pottery Culture can be assigned to I2a-M223>>L1229 which is I2a2a1b (group I2a-M223 was present in Megalithic cultures from the British Isles to today’s Czechia), while two males' Y-DNA could be assigned to the R1b-Z2103 clade, which appears in contemporaneous populations such as in Bell Beaker period samples from Hungary or a Vucedol culture associated individual from Croatia (in whichever case the most ancient samples come from the Pontic steppes). The ancestry composition of the eight individuals buried was ~29% hunter-gatherer, ~46% European farmer, ~25% western steppe herder. Some individuals had up to ~47% Mesolithic hunter-gatherer ancestry, despite this component being thought to be highly diluted by the time of the Early Bronze Age.^[10]

Gallery

Large ceramic bowl, Romania
Pottery, Serbia
Ceramic figurine or idol, Romania^[11]
Figurine from Stubarlija, Serbia
Kličevac Idol, Serbia
Gold lock-rings and bracelets from Pécs, Hungary.^[12]
Decorated ceramic disc, Serbia
Pottery, Serbia
Chariot model 1 from Dupljaja, Serbia^[13]^[9]
Chariot model 1, side view
Chariot model 2 from Dupljaja, Serbia
Chariot model 2, reverse view

References

^ Kiss, Viktória (2012). Middle Bronze Age Encrusted Pottery in Western Hungary. Archaeolingua. ISBN 978-963-9911-37-6.
^ Szeverényi, Vajk; Fischl, Klara (January 2013). "Transformations in the Carpathian Basin around 1600 BC". In Meller, Harald; Bertemes, Francois (eds.). 1600 – Cultural change in the shadow of the Thera-Eruption?. Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt. pp. 355–371.
^ Kulcsár, Gabriella (2003). "The Early Bronze Age". In Visy, Zsolt (ed.). Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millennium (PDF). Ministry of National Cultural Heritage. pp. 148–149. ISBN 9638629185. The close of the Early Bronze Age saw the arrival of new, southern population groups to the territory earlier occupied by the Somogyvár–Vinkovci culture. These groups blended with the local population, giving rise to the Kisapostag culture. ... It is difficult to draw a sharp boundary between the Early and Middle Bronze Age since the layer sequence of certain tells indicates a peaceful and continuous development, although ethnic, economic and historic changes can be noted, as a result of which three major cultural and regional units can be distinguished in the Middle Bronze Age (19th–14th centuries B.C.): the Encrusted Pottery culture of Transdanubia, practicing a Central European economy, the tell cultures of the Tisza region and the Vatya culture – distributed partly in Transdanubia and partly in the Danube–Tisza interfluve – the latter two both part of the southern cultural koine.
^ Kiss, Viktória (2011). "The role of the Danube in the Early and Middle Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin". In Kovács, Gy.; Kulcsár, G. (eds.). Ten Thousand years along the Danube. Archaeolingua. pp. 226–231.
^ Cavazzuti, Claudio (2022). "The First 'Urnfields' in the Plains of the Danube and the Po". Journal of World Prehistory. 35: 45–86. doi:10.1007/s10963-022-09164-0. hdl:10831/85720. S2CID 247555868. The first group that meets all essential criteria of the Urnfield package in the Danube area is Dubovac–Žuto Brdo–Gârla Mare (DŽG), a southern manifestation of the large supra-regional phenomenon known as 'Danubian Encrusted Pottery'
^ Szentmiklosi, Alexandru (2006). "The Relations of the Cruceni-Belegiš Culture with the Zuto Brdo–Gârla Mare Culture". Analele Banatului. 14. doi:10.55201/XMCT6788. As a consequence of the pressure exercised by the communities of the Tumular Culture (Hügelgräberkultur), warrior populations coming from Central Europe, to which the hiding of the bronze hoards from Koszider horizon are hypothetically related, communities of the northern-Pannonian inlayed ceramics culture (Esztergom group) leave Transdanubia and they withdraw to the south along the valley of the Sió river, occupying the area between the Danube and the Tisza. The movement to the south of the communities of the northern-Pannonian inlayed ceramics stimulated, but at a reduced extent, elements from the southern area of Transdanubia, too. The grafting of the elements of civilization typical of the communities of the northern-Pannonian inlayed ceramics with local ones (Gerjen, Vatina and Verbicioara) determined the appearance of a new ethnical-cultural manifestation known especially as "Szeremle group" ... The short evolution of this cultural group played a very important role in the genesis of some new ethnical-cultural manifestations. One of them was the Žuto Brdo–Gârla Mare culture, which developed from the Szeremle communities, that were coming down to the neighbouring of the western side of the Carpathians.
^ Molloy, Barry; et al. (2023). "Resilience, innovation and collapse of settlement networks in later Bronze Age Europe: New survey data from the southern Carpathian Basin". PLOS ONE. 18 (11): e0288750. Bibcode:2023PLoSO..1888750M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0288750. PMC 10637690. PMID 37948415. In the Hungarian Danube region, Transdanubian Encrusted Ware develops during the MBA and the theory remains that migration brought this style into the Serbian Danube area, having developed into the related encrusted Szeremle style and influenced the Dubovac-Žuto Brdo style. The Szeremle style developed along the north-south stretch of the Danube corridor and Dubovac-Žuto Brdo style along the same river after its turn to an easterly flow. There are close similarities to both styles during the LBA with regard to motifs, decorative schema and vessel shapes, but the earliest phases of each style are traced to the MBA when they initially draw on related but distinct local traditions. Sidestepping discussion of minor differences for our purposes here during the LBA phase we consider them as a broad stylistic family under the acronym SDŽB. The consumption of SDŽB was focussed on the Danube but it was consumed commonly in the southern reaches of the lower Pannonian network
^ Boardman, John; Edwards, I.E.S; Hammond, N.G.L; Sollberger, E., eds. (1982). "1. The Prehistory of Romania, VII. The Bronze Age". The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 3, Part 1 (Second ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 179. ISBN 978-0521224963. In the formation of the Dubovac—Zuto Brdo group an important role must certainly have been played by the influence of the neighbouring West Pannonian encrusted pottery. The great similarity between the idols of this group and those of Mycenaean art has often been pointed out. Moreover, the link between the Dupljaja cart and the Hyperborean myth of Apollo, as well as the appearance of Greek meanders on pottery and the discovery at the Ceramicus cemetery in Athens of later vessels and figurines with similar ornamentation, suggests connexions with the world of Greece. For the present the question remains open whether one sees here a wider spiritual koine in the Balkan Peninsula or the participation of the bearers of our group in Aegean migrations farther south.
^ ^a ^b Bilić, Tomislav (2016-12-30). "The swan chariot of a solar deity: Greek narratives and prehistoric iconography". Documenta Praehistorica. 43. University of Ljubljana: 445–466. doi:10.4312/dp.43.23. ISSN 1854-2492.
^ Gerber, Dániel; et, alii (2022), Interdisciplinary analyses of Bronze Age communities from Western Hungary reveal complex population histories (PDF), doi:10.1101/2022.02.03.478968
^ "Figurine, 1600-1300 BC, Romania". Institute for the Study of the Ancient World. 21 September 2022.
^ Kiss, Viktória (2012). Middle Bronze Age Encrusted Pottery in Western Hungary. Archaeolingua. p. 220. ISBN 978-963-9911-37-6. the stray gold lock-rings found in transdanubia are usually linked to the Encrusted Pottery culture, together with the hoards brought to light at uzdborjád/Kölesd–Hangospuszta, nagyberki–Kisberki and in the Pécs area (Fig. 5).
^ Molloy, Barry; et al. (2023). "Early Chariots and Religion in South-East Europe and the Aegean During the Bronze Age: A Reappraisal of the Dupljaja Chariot in Context". European Journal of Archaeology: 1–21. doi:10.1017/eaa.2023.39.

External links

'Figurine', Encrusted Pottery culture, 1700–1400 BCE, Institute for the study of the Ancient World

This article relating to archaeology in Europe is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[1] Kiss, Viktória (2012). Middle Bronze Age Encrusted Pottery in Western Hungary. Archaeolingua. ISBN 978-963-9911-37-6.

[2] Szeverényi, Vajk; Fischl, Klara (January 2013). "Transformations in the Carpathian Basin around 1600 BC". In Meller, Harald; Bertemes, Francois (eds.). 1600 – Cultural change in the shadow of the Thera-Eruption?. Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt. pp. 355–371.

[3] Kulcsár, Gabriella (2003). "The Early Bronze Age". In Visy, Zsolt (ed.). Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millennium (PDF). Ministry of National Cultural Heritage. pp. 148–149. ISBN 9638629185. The close of the Early Bronze Age saw the arrival of new, southern population groups to the territory earlier occupied by the Somogyvár–Vinkovci culture. These groups blended with the local population, giving rise to the Kisapostag culture. ... It is difficult to draw a sharp boundary between the Early and Middle Bronze Age since the layer sequence of certain tells indicates a peaceful and continuous development, although ethnic, economic and historic changes can be noted, as a result of which three major cultural and regional units can be distinguished in the Middle Bronze Age (19th–14th centuries B.C.): the Encrusted Pottery culture of Transdanubia, practicing a Central European economy, the tell cultures of the Tisza region and the Vatya culture – distributed partly in Transdanubia and partly in the Danube–Tisza interfluve – the latter two both part of the southern cultural koine.

[4] Kiss, Viktória (2011). "The role of the Danube in the Early and Middle Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin". In Kovács, Gy.; Kulcsár, G. (eds.). Ten Thousand years along the Danube. Archaeolingua. pp. 226–231.

[5] Cavazzuti, Claudio (2022). "The First 'Urnfields' in the Plains of the Danube and the Po". Journal of World Prehistory. 35: 45–86. doi:10.1007/s10963-022-09164-0. hdl:10831/85720. S2CID 247555868. The first group that meets all essential criteria of the Urnfield package in the Danube area is Dubovac–Žuto Brdo–Gârla Mare (DŽG), a southern manifestation of the large supra-regional phenomenon known as 'Danubian Encrusted Pottery'

[6] Szentmiklosi, Alexandru (2006). "The Relations of the Cruceni-Belegiš Culture with the Zuto Brdo–Gârla Mare Culture". Analele Banatului. 14. doi:10.55201/XMCT6788. As a consequence of the pressure exercised by the communities of the Tumular Culture (Hügelgräberkultur), warrior populations coming from Central Europe, to which the hiding of the bronze hoards from Koszider horizon are hypothetically related, communities of the northern-Pannonian inlayed ceramics culture (Esztergom group) leave Transdanubia and they withdraw to the south along the valley of the Sió river, occupying the area between the Danube and the Tisza. The movement to the south of the communities of the northern-Pannonian inlayed ceramics stimulated, but at a reduced extent, elements from the southern area of Transdanubia, too. The grafting of the elements of civilization typical of the communities of the northern-Pannonian inlayed ceramics with local ones (Gerjen, Vatina and Verbicioara) determined the appearance of a new ethnical-cultural manifestation known especially as "Szeremle group" ... The short evolution of this cultural group played a very important role in the genesis of some new ethnical-cultural manifestations. One of them was the Žuto Brdo–Gârla Mare culture, which developed from the Szeremle communities, that were coming down to the neighbouring of the western side of the Carpathians.

[7] Molloy, Barry; et al. (2023). "Resilience, innovation and collapse of settlement networks in later Bronze Age Europe: New survey data from the southern Carpathian Basin". PLOS ONE. 18 (11): e0288750. Bibcode:2023PLoSO..1888750M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0288750. PMC 10637690. PMID 37948415. In the Hungarian Danube region, Transdanubian Encrusted Ware develops during the MBA and the theory remains that migration brought this style into the Serbian Danube area, having developed into the related encrusted Szeremle style and influenced the Dubovac-Žuto Brdo style. The Szeremle style developed along the north-south stretch of the Danube corridor and Dubovac-Žuto Brdo style along the same river after its turn to an easterly flow. There are close similarities to both styles during the LBA with regard to motifs, decorative schema and vessel shapes, but the earliest phases of each style are traced to the MBA when they initially draw on related but distinct local traditions. Sidestepping discussion of minor differences for our purposes here during the LBA phase we consider them as a broad stylistic family under the acronym SDŽB. The consumption of SDŽB was focussed on the Danube but it was consumed commonly in the southern reaches of the lower Pannonian network

[8] Boardman, John; Edwards, I.E.S; Hammond, N.G.L; Sollberger, E., eds. (1982). "1. The Prehistory of Romania, VII. The Bronze Age". The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 3, Part 1 (Second ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 179. ISBN 978-0521224963. In the formation of the Dubovac—Zuto Brdo group an important role must certainly have been played by the influence of the neighbouring West Pannonian encrusted pottery. The great similarity between the idols of this group and those of Mycenaean art has often been pointed out. Moreover, the link between the Dupljaja cart and the Hyperborean myth of Apollo, as well as the appearance of Greek meanders on pottery and the discovery at the Ceramicus cemetery in Athens of later vessels and figurines with similar ornamentation, suggests connexions with the world of Greece. For the present the question remains open whether one sees here a wider spiritual koine in the Balkan Peninsula or the participation of the bearers of our group in Aegean migrations farther south.

[Bilić_2016_pp._445–466-9] Bilić, Tomislav (2016-12-30). "The swan chariot of a solar deity: Greek narratives and prehistoric iconography". Documenta Praehistorica. 43. University of Ljubljana: 445–466. doi:10.4312/dp.43.23. ISSN 1854-2492.

[10] Gerber, Dániel; et, alii (2022), Interdisciplinary analyses of Bronze Age communities from Western Hungary reveal complex population histories (PDF), doi:10.1101/2022.02.03.478968

[11] "Figurine, 1600-1300 BC, Romania". Institute for the Study of the Ancient World. 21 September 2022.

[12] Kiss, Viktória (2012). Middle Bronze Age Encrusted Pottery in Western Hungary. Archaeolingua. p. 220. ISBN 978-963-9911-37-6. the stray gold lock-rings found in transdanubia are usually linked to the Encrusted Pottery culture, together with the hoards brought to light at uzdborjád/Kölesd–Hangospuszta, nagyberki–Kisberki and in the Pécs area (Fig. 5).

[13] Molloy, Barry; et al. (2023). "Early Chariots and Religion in South-East Europe and the Aegean During the Bronze Age: A Reappraisal of the Dupljaja Chariot in Context". European Journal of Archaeology: 1–21. doi:10.1017/eaa.2023.39.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{infobox archaeological culture
 |name=Encrusted Pottery culture
+|map=Chariot from Dupljaja, Serbia, c.1300 BC (Bronze Age).jpg
 |region=[[Hungary]], [[Croatia]], [[Serbia]], [[Romania]]
 |period=[[Bronze Age Europe|Bronze Age]]
 |dates=ca. 2000 BC - 14th century BC
-|precededby=Kisapostag culture, [[Somogyvár-Vinkovci culture]]
+|precededby=Kisapostag culture, [[Vucedol culture]], [[Somogyvár-Vinkovci culture]], [[Vatin culture]]
-|followedby=[[Tumulus culture]], [[Urnfield culture]]}}
+|followedby= [[Tumulus culture]], [[Belegiš|Belegiš culture]], [[Urnfield culture]]}}
+{{See also|Bronze Age Hungary}}
-The '''Encrusted Pottery culture''' was an [[archaeological culture]] of the [[Bronze Age Europe|Early to Middle Bronze Age]] (c. 2000-1400 BC) originating in the [[Transdanubia|Transdanubian]] region of western [[Hungary]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Kiss |first=Viktória |url=https://www.academia.edu/40913016/MIDDLE_BRONZE_AGE_ENCRUSTED_POTTERY_IN_WESTERN_HUNGARY |title=Middle Bronze Age Encrusted Pottery in Western Hungary |date=2012 |publisher=Archaeolingua |isbn=978-963-9911-37-6}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Szeverényi |first1=Vajk |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265334711_Transformations_in_the_Carpathian_Basin_around_1600_BC |title=1600 – Cultural change in the shadow of the Thera-Eruption? |last2=Fischl |first2=Klara |date=January 2013 |publisher=Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt |editor-last1=Meller |editor-first1=Harald |pages=355–371 |chapter=Transformations in the Carpathian Basin around 1600 BC |editor-last2=Bertemes |editor-first2=Francois}}</ref> It emerged from the Kisapostag culture, which was preceded by the [[Somogyvár-Vinkovci culture]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Kulcsár |first1=Gabriella |url=http://www.ace.hu/curric/elte-archeometria/irodalom/Hungarian_archeology.pdf |title=Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millennium |date=2003 |publisher=Ministry of National Cultural Heritage |isbn=9638629185 |editor-last=Visy |editor-first=Zsolt |pages=148-149 |chapter=The Early Bronze Age |quote=The close of the Early Bronze Age saw the arrival of new, southern population groups to the territory earlier occupied by the Somogyvár–Vinkovci culture. These groups blended with the local population, giving rise to the Kisapostag culture. ... It is difficult to draw a sharp boundary between the Early and Middle Bronze Age since the layer sequence of certain tells indicates a peaceful and continuous development, although ethnic, economic and historic changes can be noted, as a result of which three major cultural and regional units can be distinguished in the Middle Bronze Age (19th–14th centuries B.C.): the Encrusted Pottery culture of Transdanubia, practicing a Central European economy, the tell cultures of the Tisza region and the Vatya culture – distributed partly in Transdanubia and partly in the Danube–Tisza interfluve – the latter two both part of the southern cultural ''koine''.}}</ref> The Encrusted Pottery culture expanded eastwards and southwards along the [[Danube]] into parts of [[Croatia]], [[Serbia]], [[Romania]] and [[Bulgaria]] in response to migrations from the northwest by the [[Tumulus culture]], resulting in the emergence of groups such as Dubovác–Žuto Brdo in Serbia and Gârla Mare–Cârna in Romania, which are considered to be southern manifestations of the Encrusted Pottery culture.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kiss |first=Viktória |url=https://www.academia.edu/1404278/The_role_of_the_Danube_in_the_Early_and_Middle_Bronze_Age_of_the_Carpathian_Basin |title=Ten Thousand years along the Danube |date=2011 |publisher=Archaeolingua |editor-last1=Kovács |editor-first1=Gy. |editor-last2=Kulcsár |editor-first2=G. |pages=226-231 |chapter=The role of the Danube in the Early and Middle Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Cavazzuti |first=Claudio |date=2022 |title=The First ‘Urnfields’ in the Plains of the Danube and the Po |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10963-022-09164-0 |journal=Journal of World Prehistory |volume=35 |pages=45-86 |doi=10.1007/s10963-022-09164-0 |quote=The first group that meets all essential criteria of the Urnfield package in the Danube area is Dubovac–Žuto Brdo–Gârla Mare (DŽG), a southern manifestation of the large supra-regional phenomenon known as ‘Danubian Encrusted Pottery’}}</ref> The culture was named after its pottery decorated with incised designs highlighted with white inlaid lime, and is notable for the production of figurines or idols decorated in the same style. Stylistic similarities have also been noted between Encrusted Pottery artefacts and artefacts from [[Mycenaean Greece]].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Cambridge_Ancient_History/vXljf8JqmkoC?hl=&gbpv=1 |title=The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 3, Part 1 (Second Edition) |date=1982 |isbn=978-0521224963 |editor-last1=Boardman |editor-first1=John |pages=179 |chapter=1. The Prehistory of Romania, VII. The Bronze Age |quote=In the formation of the Dubovac—Zuto Brdo group an important role must certainly have been played by the influence of the neighbouring West Pannonian encrusted pottery. The great similarity between the idols of this group and those of Mycenaean art has often been pointed out. Moreover, the link between the Dupljaja cart and the Hyperborean myth of Apollo, as well as the appearance of Greek meanders on pottery and the discovery at the Ceramicus cemetery in Athens of later vessels and figurines with similar ornamentation, suggests connexions with the world of Greece. For the present the question remains open whether one sees here a wider spiritual ''koine'' in the Balkan Peninsula or the participation of the bearers of our group in Aegean migrations farther south. |editor-last2=Edwards |editor-first2=I.E.S |editor-last3=Hammond |editor-first3=N.G.L |editor-last4=Sollberger |editor-first4=E.}}</ref>
+The '''Encrusted Pottery culture''' was an [[archaeological culture]] of the [[Bronze Age Europe|Early to Middle Bronze Age]] (c. 2000-1400 BC) originating in the [[Transdanubia|Transdanubian]] region of western [[Hungary]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Kiss |first=Viktória |url=https://www.academia.edu/40913016 |title=Middle Bronze Age Encrusted Pottery in Western Hungary |date=2012 |publisher=Archaeolingua |isbn=978-963-9911-37-6}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Szeverényi |first1=Vajk |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265334711 |title=1600 – Cultural change in the shadow of the Thera-Eruption? |last2=Fischl |first2=Klara |date=January 2013 |publisher=Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt |editor-last1=Meller |editor-first1=Harald |pages=355–371 |chapter=Transformations in the Carpathian Basin around 1600 BC |editor-last2=Bertemes |editor-first2=Francois}}</ref> It emerged from the Kisapostag culture, which was preceded by the [[Somogyvár-Vinkovci culture]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Kulcsár |first1=Gabriella |url=http://www.ace.hu/curric/elte-archeometria/irodalom/Hungarian_archeology.pdf |title=Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millennium |date=2003 |publisher=Ministry of National Cultural Heritage |isbn=9638629185 |editor-last=Visy |editor-first=Zsolt |pages=148–149 |chapter=The Early Bronze Age |quote=The close of the Early Bronze Age saw the arrival of new, southern population groups to the territory earlier occupied by the Somogyvár–Vinkovci culture. These groups blended with the local population, giving rise to the Kisapostag culture. ... It is difficult to draw a sharp boundary between the Early and Middle Bronze Age since the layer sequence of certain tells indicates a peaceful and continuous development, although ethnic, economic and historic changes can be noted, as a result of which three major cultural and regional units can be distinguished in the Middle Bronze Age (19th–14th centuries B.C.): the Encrusted Pottery culture of Transdanubia, practicing a Central European economy, the tell cultures of the Tisza region and the Vatya culture – distributed partly in Transdanubia and partly in the Danube–Tisza interfluve – the latter two both part of the southern cultural ''koine''.}}</ref> The Encrusted Pottery culture expanded eastwards and southwards along the [[Danube]] into parts of [[Croatia]], [[Serbia]], [[Romania]] and [[Bulgaria]] in response to migrations from the northwest by the [[Tumulus culture]], resulting in the emergence of groups such as Dubovác–Žuto Brdo in Serbia and Gârla Mare–Cârna in Romania, which are considered to be southern manifestations of the Encrusted Pottery culture.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kiss |first=Viktória |url=https://www.academia.edu/1404278 |title=Ten Thousand years along the Danube |date=2011 |publisher=Archaeolingua |editor-last1=Kovács |editor-first1=Gy. |editor-last2=Kulcsár |editor-first2=G. |pages=226–231 |chapter=The role of the Danube in the Early and Middle Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Cavazzuti |first=Claudio |date=2022 |title=The First 'Urnfields' in the Plains of the Danube and the Po |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10963-022-09164-0 |journal=Journal of World Prehistory |volume=35 |pages=45–86 |doi=10.1007/s10963-022-09164-0 |s2cid=247555868 |quote=The first group that meets all essential criteria of the Urnfield package in the Danube area is Dubovac–Žuto Brdo–Gârla Mare (DŽG), a southern manifestation of the large supra-regional phenomenon known as ‘Danubian Encrusted Pottery’|hdl=10831/85720 |hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325087393 |journal=Analele Banatului |volume=14 |date=2006 |title=The Relations of the Cruceni-Belegiš Culture with the Zuto Brdo–Gârla Mare Culture |last=Szentmiklosi |first=Alexandru |doi=10.55201/XMCT6788 |quote=As a consequence of the pressure exercised by the communities of the Tumular Culture (''Hügelgräberkultur''), warrior populations coming from Central Europe, to which the hiding of the bronze hoards from Koszider horizon are hypothetically related, communities of the northern-Pannonian inlayed ceramics culture (Esztergom group) leave Transdanubia and they withdraw to the south along the valley of the Sió river, occupying the area between the Danube and the Tisza. The movement to the south of the communities of the northern-Pannonian inlayed ceramics stimulated, but at a reduced extent, elements from the southern area of Transdanubia, too. The grafting of the elements of civilization typical of the communities of the northern-Pannonian inlayed ceramics with local ones (Gerjen, Vatina and Verbicioara) determined the appearance of a new ethnical-cultural manifestation known especially as "Szeremle group” ... The short evolution of this cultural group played a very important role in the genesis of some new ethnical-cultural manifestations. One of them was the Žuto Brdo–Gârla Mare culture, which developed from the Szeremle communities, that were coming down to the neighbouring of the western side of the Carpathians.}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=18 |issue=11 |date=2023 |title=Resilience, innovation and collapse of settlement networks in later Bronze Age Europe: New survey data from the southern Carpathian Basin |last1=Molloy |first1=Barry |pages=e0288750 |display-authors=etal |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0288750 |doi-access=free |pmid=37948415 |pmc=10637690 |bibcode=2023PLoSO..1888750M |quote=In the Hungarian Danube region, Transdanubian Encrusted Ware develops during the MBA and the theory remains that migration brought this style into the Serbian Danube area, having developed into the related encrusted Szeremle style and influenced the Dubovac-Žuto Brdo style. The Szeremle style developed along the north-south stretch of the Danube corridor and Dubovac-Žuto Brdo style along the same river after its turn to an easterly flow. There are close similarities to both styles during the LBA with regard to motifs, decorative schema and vessel shapes, but the earliest phases of each style are traced to the MBA when they initially draw on related but distinct local traditions. Sidestepping discussion of minor differences for our purposes here during the LBA phase we consider them as a broad stylistic family under the acronym SDŽB. The consumption of SDŽB was focussed on the Danube but it was consumed commonly in the southern reaches of the lower Pannonian network}}</ref> The culture was named after its distinctive pottery decorated with incised designs inlaid with [[lime (material)|white lime]], and  southern groups are notable for the production of figurines or idols decorated in the same style. Stylistic similarities have also been noted between Encrusted Pottery artefacts and artefacts from [[Mycenaean Greece]].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vXljf8JqmkoC |title=The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 3, Part 1 |date=1982 |isbn=978-0521224963 |editor-last1=Boardman |editor-first1=John |pages=179 |chapter=1. The Prehistory of Romania, VII. The Bronze Age |publisher=Cambridge University Press |quote=In the formation of the Dubovac—Zuto Brdo group an important role must certainly have been played by the influence of the neighbouring West Pannonian encrusted pottery. The great similarity between the idols of this group and those of Mycenaean art has often been pointed out. Moreover, the link between the Dupljaja cart and the Hyperborean myth of Apollo, as well as the appearance of Greek meanders on pottery and the discovery at the Ceramicus cemetery in Athens of later vessels and figurines with similar ornamentation, suggests connexions with the world of Greece. For the present the question remains open whether one sees here a wider spiritual ''koine'' in the Balkan Peninsula or the participation of the bearers of our group in Aegean migrations farther south. |editor-last2=Edwards |editor-first2=I.E.S |editor-last3=Hammond |editor-first3=N.G.L |editor-last4=Sollberger |editor-first4=E.|edition=Second }}</ref><ref name="Bilić 2016 pp. 445–466">{{cite journal | last=Bilić | first=Tomislav | title=The swan chariot of a solar deity: Greek narratives and prehistoric iconography | journal=Documenta Praehistorica | publisher=University of Ljubljana | volume=43 | date=2016-12-30 | issn=1854-2492 | doi=10.4312/dp.43.23 | pages=445–466| doi-access=free }}</ref>
+==Genetic profile==
+Four Y-DNA testings from the [[Balatonkeresztúr]] mass grave burial dated to the Encrusted Pottery Culture can be assigned to I2a-M223>>L1229 which is I2a2a1b (group I2a-M223 was
+present in [[Megalith|Megalithic]] cultures from the British Isles to today’s Czechia), while two males' Y-DNA could be assigned to the R1b-Z2103 clade, which appears in contemporaneous populations such as in [[Bell Beaker culture|Bell Beaker]] period samples from Hungary or a [[Vučedol culture|Vucedol culture]] associated individual from Croatia (in whichever case the most ancient samples come from the [[Pontic–Caspian steppe|Pontic steppes]]). The ancestry composition of the eight individuals buried was ~29% hunter-gatherer, ~46% European farmer, ~25% western steppe herder. Some individuals had up to ~47% Mesolithic hunter-gatherer ancestry, despite this component being thought to be highly diluted by the time of the Early Bronze Age.<ref>{{citation|doi=10.1101/2022.02.03.478968|title=Interdisciplinary analyses of Bronze Age communities from Western Hungary reveal complex population histories|last1=Gerber|first1=Dániel|last2=et|first2=alii|year=2022|url=http://real.mtak.hu/174794/1/msad182.pdf }}</ref>
 == Gallery ==
-<gallery>
+<gallery perrow="6">
-File:Carna figurine lb mnir.jpg|Ceramic figurine or idol, Romania
-File:Kličevac Idol, 13th-11th c. BC, Terracota, Kostolac.jpg|Kličevac Idol, Serbia
-File:Encrusted Pottery type urn, museum Zrenjanin.jpg|Pottery, Serbia
 File:Romania, possibly Cirna, Middle Bronze Age - Large Bowl - 1993.229 - Cleveland Museum of Art.jpg|Large ceramic bowl, Romania
+File:Vršac museum artefacts 003, Vatin culture (Bronze Age).jpg|Pottery, Serbia
-File:Bronze Age Europe Bronze Ornaments (28471753250).jpg|Gold lock-rings and other ornaments from Pécs, Hungary.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kiss |first=Viktória |url=https://www.academia.edu/40913016/MIDDLE_BRONZE_AGE_ENCRUSTED_POTTERY_IN_WESTERN_HUNGARY |title=Middle Bronze Age Encrusted Pottery in Western Hungary |date=2012 |publisher=Archaeolingua |isbn=978-963-9911-37-6 |pages=220 |quote=the stray gold lock-rings found in transdanubia are usually linked to the Encrusted Pottery culture, together with the hoards brought to light at uzdborjád/Kölesd–Hangospuszta, nagyberki–Kisberki and in the Pécs area (Fig. 5).}}</ref>
+File:Carna figurine lb mnir.jpg|Ceramic figurine or idol, Romania<ref>{{cite web |url=https://isaw.nyu.edu/exhibitions/ritual-and-memory/objects/figurine-carna-grindul-tomii |title=Figurine, 1600-1300 BC, Romania |website=Institute for the Study of the Ancient World|date=21 September 2022 }}</ref>
+File:Figurina iz groba, bronzano doba, Stubarlija, Mošorin.tif|Figurine from Stubarlija, Serbia
+File:Kličevac Idol, Serbia.jpg|Kličevac Idol, Serbia
+File:Bronze Age Europe Bronze Ornaments (28471753250).jpg|alt=Gold lock-rings and other ornaments from Pécs, Hungary.|Gold lock-rings and bracelets from Pécs, Hungary.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kiss |first=Viktória |url=https://www.academia.edu/40913016 |title=Middle Bronze Age Encrusted Pottery in Western Hungary |date=2012 |publisher=Archaeolingua |isbn=978-963-9911-37-6 |pages=220 |quote=the stray gold lock-rings found in transdanubia are usually linked to the Encrusted Pottery culture, together with the hoards brought to light at uzdborjád/Kölesd–Hangospuszta, nagyberki–Kisberki and in the Pécs area (Fig. 5).}}</ref>
+File:Bronze Age applied art and craft 2nd millenium BC (National Museum of Serbia).jpg|Decorated ceramic disc, Serbia
+File:Sombor museum artefacts 018 (Bronze Age).jpg|Pottery, Serbia
+File:Dupljaja.jpg|Chariot model 1 from [[Dupljaja]], Serbia<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-archaeology/article/early-chariots-and-religion-in-southeast-europe-and-the-aegean-during-the-bronze-age-a-reappraisal-of-the-dupljaja-chariot-in-context/DC2A0FC7066548E7C0FED0C9024169B3 |journal=European Journal of Archaeology |date=2023 |title= Early Chariots and Religion in South-East Europe and the Aegean During the Bronze Age: A Reappraisal of the Dupljaja Chariot in Context |last1=Molloy |first1=Barry |display-authors=etal |pages=1–21 |doi=10.1017/eaa.2023.39|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Bilić 2016 pp. 445–466">{{cite journal | last=Bilić | first=Tomislav | title=The swan chariot of a solar deity: Greek narratives and prehistoric iconography | journal=Documenta Praehistorica | publisher=University of Ljubljana | volume=43 | date=2016-12-30 | issn=1854-2492 | doi=10.4312/dp.43.23 | pages=445–466| doi-access=free }}</ref>
+File:Chariot from Dupljaja, Serbia, c.1300 BC (Bronze Age).jpg|Chariot model 1, side view
+File:Dupljaja Chariot 2.png|Chariot model 2 from Dupljaja, Serbia
+File:Dupljaja Chariot 2a.png|Chariot model 2, reverse view
 </gallery>
@@ Line 21: / Line 35: @@
 * [[Ottomány culture]]
+* [[Únětice culture|Unetice culture]]
 * [[Wietenberg culture]]
 * [[Monteoru culture]]
@@ Line 30: / Line 45: @@
 == References ==
 {{Reflist}}
+==External links==
+{{Commons category|Encrusted Pottery culture}}
+*[https://isaw.nyu.edu/exhibitions/ritual-and-memory/objects/figurine-dalj 'Figurine', Encrusted Pottery culture, 1700–1400 BCE, Institute for the study of the Ancient World]
 {{DEFAULTSORT:Encrusted Pottery culture}}
-[[Category:Archaeological cultures of Central Europe]]
+[[Category:Archaeological cultures of Europe]]
 [[Category:Bronze Age cultures of Europe]]
 [[Category:Archaeological cultures in Hungary]]
@@ Line 38: / Line 59: @@
 [[Category:Archaeological cultures in Serbia]]
 [[Category:Archaeological cultures in Romania]]
+{{Europe-archaeology-stub}}