Jump to content

Lewis A. Kaplan: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Miscellaneous: duplicated
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American judge (born 1944)}}
{{Short description|American judge (born 1944)}}
{{about||the violinist|Lewis Kaplan|people of a similar name|Louis Kaplan (disambiguation)}}
{{about||the violinist|Lewis Kaplan|people of a similar name|Louis Kaplan (disambiguation)}}
{{use mdy dates|date=May 2023}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2024}}
{{Infobox officeholder
{{Infobox officeholder
|name = Lewis Kaplan
|name = Lewis A. Kaplan
|image = Lewis A. Kaplan (cropped).jpg
|image = Lewis A. Kaplan (cropped).jpg
|caption = Kaplan in 2014
|caption = Kaplan in 2014
Line 10: Line 10:
|term_end =
|term_end =
|office1 = Judge of the [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]]
|office1 = Judge of the [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]]
|appointer1 = [[Bill Clinton]]
|term_start1 = August 10, 1994
|term_start1 = August 10, 1994
|term_end1 = February 1, 2011
|term_end1 = February 1, 2011
|appointer1 = [[List of federal judges appointed by Bill Clinton|Bill Clinton]]
|predecessor1 = [[Gerard Louis Goettel]]
|predecessor1 = [[Gerard Louis Goettel]]
|successor1 = [[Ronnie Abrams]]
|successor1 = [[Ronnie Abrams]]
|birth_name =
|birth_date = {{birth date and age|1944|12|23}}
|birth_date = {{birth date and age|1944|12|23}}
|birth_place = {{nowrap|[[New York City]], New York, U.S.}}
|birth_place = {{nowrap|[[New York City]], U.S.}}
|death_date =
|death_date =
|death_place =
|death_place =
|spouse = Lesley Oelsner
|spouse = {{marriage|Lesley Oelsner|2004}}
|education = {{nowrap|[[University of Rochester]] ([[Bachelor of Arts|BA]])}}<br>[[Harvard Law School|Harvard University]] ([[Juris Doctor|JD]])
|education = {{nowrap|[[University of Rochester]] ([[Bachelor of Arts|BA]])}}<br>[[Harvard Law School|Harvard University]] ([[Juris Doctor|JD]])
}}
}}
'''Lewis A. Kaplan''' (born December 23, 1944<ref>{{cite book |last= |first= |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UIYtS2sba6oC&q=%22Kaplan,%20Lewis%20A.%22%20AND%201944 |title=Who's Who in American Law |publisher=Marquis Who's Who |year=1983 |isbn=9780837935034 |location=Chicago |via=Google Books}}</ref>) is an American lawyer and jurist who serves as a [[Senior status|senior]] [[United States federal judge|U.S. district judge]] on the [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://prospect.org/power/chevron-big-oil-power-prosecute-its-biggest-critic/ |title=The Government Gave Big Oil the Power to Prosecute Its Biggest Critic|date=July 14, 2020 }}</ref> He was the presiding judge in a number of cases involving high-profile defendants, including ''[[E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump]]'', ''[[Virginia Giuffre v. Prince Andrew]],'' the criminal case against [[Sam Bankman-Fried]], and trials of Al Qaeda terrorists such as [[Ahmed Ghailani]].
'''Lewis Avins Kaplan''' (born December 23, 1944)<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vU76V0maYqYC&pg=PA81|page=81|title=Hearings before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Third Congress, Second Session, on Confirmations of Appointees to the Federal Judiciary, June 21, 29, 30; July 21; August 3 and 11, 1994|publisher=U.S. Government Printing Office|year=1996}}</ref> is an American lawyer and jurist who serves as a [[Senior status|senior]] [[United States federal judge|United States district judge]] of the [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://prospect.org/power/chevron-big-oil-power-prosecute-its-biggest-critic/ |title=The Government Gave Big Oil the Power to Prosecute Its Biggest Critic|date=July 14, 2020 }}</ref> He was the presiding judge in a number of cases involving high-profile defendants, including ''[[E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump]]'', ''[[Virginia Giuffre v. Prince Andrew]],'' ''[[United States v. Bankman-Fried]]'', and trials of Al Qaeda terrorists such as [[Ahmed Ghailani]].


==Education, career, personal life==
==Education, career, personal life==


Kaplan was born in 1944 in [[Staten Island, New York|Staten Island]], [[New York (state)|New York]]. He received a [[Bachelor of Arts]] degree from the [[University of Rochester]] in 1966 and a [[Juris Doctor]] from [[Harvard Law School]] in 1969.
Kaplan was born in 1944 in [[Staten Island, New York|Staten Island]], [[New York (state)|New York]]. He received a [[Bachelor of Arts]] degree from the [[University of Rochester]] in 1966 and a [[Juris Doctor]] from [[Harvard Law School]] in 1969.<ref name="FJCBio">{{FJC Bio|nid=1383061|inline=yes}}</ref>


After law school, Kaplan was a [[law clerk]] for Judge [[Edward McEntee]] of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit]], from 1969 to 1970. He then entered private practice at the law firm [[Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison]], becoming a [[Partner (business rank)|partner]] in 1977. From 1982 to 1983, he served as a Special Master for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. During his time in the private sector, Kaplan represented [[Philip Morris USA|Phillip Morris]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/almID/1135850707009/|title=The Lifesavers|first=Alsion|last=Frankel|publisher=The American Lawyer|date=2006-01-01|access-date=2020-09-09}}</ref>
After law school, Kaplan was a [[law clerk]] for Judge [[Edward McEntee]] of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit]], from 1969 to 1970. He then entered private practice at the law firm [[Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison]], becoming a [[Partner (business rank)|partner]] in 1977. From 1982 to 1983, he served as a Special Master for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. During his time in the private sector, Kaplan represented [[Philip Morris USA|Phillip Morris]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/almID/1135850707009/|title=The Lifesavers|first=Alison|last=Frankel|publisher=The American Lawyer|date=January 1, 2006|access-date=September 9, 2020}}</ref>


He married former ''[[New York Times]]'' reporter and former vice president of [[Random House]] Lesley Oelsner on February 29, 2004.<ref>{{cite news |title=Weddings/Celebrations; Lesley Oelsner, Lewis Kaplan |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/29/style/weddings-celebrations-lesley-oelsner-lewis-kaplan.html |access-date=November 25, 2019 |work=The New York Times |date=February 29, 2004}}</ref>
He married former ''[[New York Times]]'' reporter and former vice president of [[Random House]] Lesley Oelsner on February 29, 2004.<ref>{{cite news |title=Weddings/Celebrations; Lesley Oelsner, Lewis Kaplan |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/29/style/weddings-celebrations-lesley-oelsner-lewis-kaplan.html |access-date=November 25, 2019 |work=The New York Times |date=February 29, 2004}}</ref>


==Federal judicial service==
===Federal judicial service===
On May 5, 1994, Kaplan was nominated by President [[Bill Clinton]] to a seat on the [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]] vacated by Judge [[Gerard Louis Goettel]]. He was confirmed by the [[United States Senate]] on August 9, 1994, and received his commission on August 10, 1994. He took [[senior status]] on February 1, 2011.<ref>{{FJC Bio|nid=1383061|inline=yes}}</ref>
On May 5, 1994, Kaplan was nominated by President [[Bill Clinton]] to a seat on the [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]] vacated by Judge [[Gerard Louis Goettel]]. He was confirmed by the [[United States Senate]] on August 9, 1994, and received his commission on August 10, 1994. He took [[senior status]] on February 1, 2011.<ref name="FJCBio" />


==Notable cases==
===Notable cases===


=== Guantanamo detainees ===
==== Guantanamo detainees ====
Kaplan presided over the first case where charges against [[Guantanamo captives]] were laid in a civilian court.
Kaplan presided over the first case in which charges against [[Guantanamo captives]] were laid in a civilian court.
On February 9, 2010, Kaplan ordered [[Ahmed Ghailani]]'s prosecution to review the record of Ghailani's detention in the [[CIA]]'s network of [[black sites]].<ref>
On February 9, 2010, Kaplan ordered [[Ahmed Ghailani]]'s prosecution to review the record of Ghailani's detention in the [[CIA]]'s network of [[black sites]].<ref>
{{cite news
{{cite news
Line 44: Line 45:
|title = U.S. Told to Review Files on Terror Case Detention
|title = U.S. Told to Review Files on Terror Case Detention
|work = [[The New York Times]]
|work = [[The New York Times]]
|date = 2010-02-10
|date = February 10, 2010
|author = Benjamin Weiser
|author = Benjamin Weiser
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180629022400/https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/11/nyregion/11ghailani.html?pagewanted=print
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180629022400/https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/11/nyregion/11ghailani.html?pagewanted=print
|archive-date = 2018-06-29
|archive-date = June 29, 2018
|url-status = dead
|url-status = dead
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
Line 56: Line 57:
| title=Judge Refuses to Dismiss Terror Suspect's Case
| title=Judge Refuses to Dismiss Terror Suspect's Case
| work=[[The New York Times]]
| work=[[The New York Times]]
| date=2010-07-13
| date=July 13, 2010
| author=Benjamin Weiser
| author=Benjamin Weiser
}}</ref>''The New York Times'' reported that Kaplan's ruling could set a precedent for the cases of other [[Guantanamo captives]], who, like Ghailani, are transferred to the civilian justice system. On January 25, 2011, Kaplan sentenced Ghailani to life and called the attacks "horrific" and saying the deaths and damage they caused far outweighs "any and all considerations that have been advanced on behalf of the defendant." He also ordered Ghailani to pay $33 million as restitution.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2011/01/25/us/AP-US-Guantanamo-Detainee.html?ref=news|title=Gitmo Detainee Gets Life Sentence in Embassy Plot|website=[[The New York Times]] }}</ref>
}}</ref>''The New York Times'' reported that Kaplan's ruling could set a precedent for the cases of other [[Guantanamo captives]], who, like Ghailani, are transferred to the civilian justice system. On January 25, 2011, Kaplan sentenced Ghailani to life and called the attacks "horrific" and saying the deaths and damage they caused far outweighs "any and all considerations that have been advanced on behalf of the defendant." He also ordered Ghailani to pay $33 million as restitution.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2011/01/25/us/AP-US-Guantanamo-Detainee.html?ref=news|title=Gitmo Detainee Gets Life Sentence in Embassy Plot|website=[[The New York Times]] }}</ref>


=== Organized crime ===
==== Organized crime ====
Working in New York City, Kaplan had been the judge in a number of federal racketeering cases involving Mafia members. In April 2010, Kaplan was assigned to preside over the cases of 14 [[Gambino crime family]] members arrested on charges, among others, of racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, witness tampering (in the 1992 trial of [[John Gotti]]), and sex trafficking of a minor.
Working in New York City, Kaplan had been the judge in a number of federal racketeering cases involving Mafia members. In April 2010, Kaplan was assigned to preside over the cases of 14 [[Gambino crime family]] members arrested on charges, among others, of racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, witness tampering (in the 1992 trial of [[John Gotti]]), and sex trafficking of a minor.


In 2016-2017 Kaplan presided over ''[[US v. Spoutz]]'', one of the first cases of successful prosecution of attributed artwork in the United States. Eric Spoutz, an art dealer, pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud related to the sale of falsely attributed artwork accompanied by forged provenance documents. Kaplan sentenced him to 41 months in federal prison and ordered to forfeit the $1.45 million he made from the scheme and pay $154,100 in restitution.<ref>{{cite web |title=Forging Papers to Sell Fake Art |work=Federal Bureau of Investigation (press release) |date=April 6, 2017 |url=https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/forging-papers-to-sell-fake-art }}</ref>
In 2016-2017 Kaplan presided over ''[[US v. Spoutz]]'', one of the first cases of successful prosecution of attributed artwork in the United States. Eric Spoutz, an art dealer, pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud related to the sale of falsely attributed artwork accompanied by forged provenance documents. Kaplan sentenced him to 41 months in federal prison and ordered to forfeit the $1.45 million he made from the scheme and pay $154,100 in restitution.<ref>{{cite web |title=Forging Papers to Sell Fake Art |work=Federal Bureau of Investigation (press release) |date=April 6, 2017 |url=https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/forging-papers-to-sell-fake-art }}</ref>


=== ''Chevron v. Donziger'' ===
==== ''Chevron v. Donziger'' ====
Kaplan presided over and ruled in favor of Chevron's appeal of [[Lago Agrio oil field#Litigation|a major environmental case]]. It had originally been brought successfully on behalf of Ecuadorian indigenous tribes against [[Chevron Corporation|Texaco-Chevron]]. Kaplan granted Chevron's motion barring enforcement of an almost $10 billion judgement awarded by the Ecuadorian courts against the company in February 2011. Lawyers for Chevron argued the ruling was illegitimate due to foul play on the part of the plaintiffs in the case who allegedly introduced fabricated evidence and bribed witnesses and officials involved in the case. Kaplan found there to be overwhelming evidence that the Ecuadorian verdict was the result of a criminal conspiracy spear-headed by the plaintiff's lead attorney, [[Steven Donziger]]. In a ruling in July 2019, Kaplan fined Donziger $3.4 million for contempt and for Chevron's legal fees, the largest contempt sanction in US history.<ref>{{cite web |title = Suspended lawyer ordered to pay $3.4M in attorney fees to Chevron as contempt sanction|url=http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/suspended-lawyer-is-ordered-to-pay-3.4m-in-attorney-fees-to-chevron}}</ref><ref name="Interecept1">{{cite web|url=https://theintercept.com/2020/01/29/chevron-ecuador-lawsuit-steven-donziger/|title=How the environmental lawyer who won a massive judgement against Chevron lost everything|last=Lerner|first=Sharon|date=January 29, 2020|website=The Intercept}}</ref>
Kaplan presided over and ruled in favor of Chevron's appeal of [[Lago Agrio oil field#Litigation|a major environmental case]]. It had originally been brought successfully on behalf of Ecuadorian indigenous tribes against [[Chevron Corporation|Texaco-Chevron]]. Kaplan granted Chevron's motion barring enforcement of an almost $10 billion judgment awarded by the Ecuadorian courts against the company in February 2011. Lawyers for Chevron argued the ruling was illegitimate due to foul play on the part of the plaintiffs in the case who allegedly introduced fabricated evidence and bribed witnesses and officials involved in the case. Kaplan found there to be overwhelming evidence that the Ecuadorian verdict was the result of a criminal conspiracy spear-headed by the plaintiff's lead attorney, [[Steven Donziger]]. In a ruling in July 2019, Kaplan fined Donziger $3.4 million for contempt and for Chevron's legal fees, the largest contempt sanction in US history.<ref>{{cite web |title = Suspended lawyer ordered to pay $3.4M in attorney fees to Chevron as contempt sanction|url=http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/suspended-lawyer-is-ordered-to-pay-3.4m-in-attorney-fees-to-chevron}}</ref><ref name="Interecept1">{{cite web|url=https://theintercept.com/2020/01/29/chevron-ecuador-lawsuit-steven-donziger/|title=How the environmental lawyer who won a massive judgement against Chevron lost everything|last=Lerner|first=Sharon|date=January 29, 2020|website=The Intercept}}</ref>


Donziger was unable to satisfy the contempt fine and restitution award so Kaplan ordered he surrender certain personal items of his such as cell phones and computers. These devices were to be handed over to Chevron employees trying to locate any assets Dozinger may have concealed. Donziger refused to comply on the grounds doing so would be a breach of attorney-client privilege. In response, Kaplan found Donziger in criminal contempt and referred the case for prosecution. When the [[United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York|SDNY US Attorney's Office]] declined to pursue the case in August 2019, Kaplan appointed a private law firm, [[Seward & Kissel]] to prosecute Donziger.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.courthousenews.com/when-feds-demur-judge-charges-ecuador-crusader-himself/|title=When Feds Demur, Judge Charges Ecuador Crusader Himself|website=Courthouse News|date=August 13, 2019}}</ref>
Donziger was unable to satisfy the contempt fine and restitution award so Kaplan ordered he surrender certain personal items of his such as cell phones and computers. These devices were to be handed over to Chevron employees trying to locate any assets Donziger may have concealed. Donziger refused to comply on the grounds doing so would be a breach of attorney-client privilege. In response, Kaplan found Donziger in criminal contempt and referred the case for prosecution. When the [[United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York|SDNY US Attorney's Office]] declined to pursue the case in August 2019, Kaplan appointed a private law firm, [[Seward & Kissel]] to prosecute Donziger.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.courthousenews.com/when-feds-demur-judge-charges-ecuador-crusader-himself/|title=When Feds Demur, Judge Charges Ecuador Crusader Himself|website=Courthouse News|date=August 13, 2019}}</ref>


Donziger has accused Kaplan of displaying a pro-corporate bias in the case.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Holmes|first=Jack|date=2021-03-18|title='I've Been Targeted With Probably the Most Vicious Corporate Counterattack in American History'|url=https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a35812573/steven-donziger-chevron-house-arrest/|access-date=2021-03-19|website=Esquire|language=en-US}}</ref> At the hearing, Alberto Guerra, a former Ecuadorian judge, testified for Chevron, claiming Donziger bribed him and others to win the case by fraud. Guerra's testimony was cited by Kaplan as a key factor in his decision. In 2015, Guerra claimed his testimony against Donziger had been largely a lie.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/neye7z/chevrons-star-witness-admits-to-lying-in-the-amazon-pollution-case|title=Chevron's Star Witness Admits to Lying in the Amazon Pollution Case|last=Hershaw|first=Eva|date=2015-10-26|website=Vice|language=en|access-date=2020-04-18}}</ref> According to ''The Intercept'', Kaplan has written favorably about Chevron and "bypassed the standard random assignment process and handpicked someone he knew well, U.S. District Judge [[Loretta Preska]], to oversee the case being prosecuted by the firm he chose."<ref name="Interecept1" /> Seward & Kissel partner Rita Glavin claimed that the firm did not have a conflict of interest with regards to the case, even though Seward & Kissel has worked with Chevron at least twice, including as recently as 2018.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Government Gave Big Oil the Power to Prosecute Its Biggest Critic|url=https://prospect.org/power/chevron-big-oil-power-prosecute-its-biggest-critic/|last1=Bragman|first1=Walker|last2=Sirota|first2=David|date=July 14, 2020|work=[[The American Prospect]]}}</ref> In September 2020, the [[National Lawyers Guild]] and [[International Association of Democratic Lawyers]] filed a joint complaint against Kaplan over his treatment of Donziger, alleging that “statements and actions of Judge Kaplan over the last ten years show him to have taken on the role of counsel for Chevron … rather than that of a judge adjudicating a live controversy before him.”<ref>{{Cite news|title=More than 200 lawyers file judicial complaint against Judge Lewis A. Kaplan over abusive targeting of human rights advocate Steven Donziger|url=https://iadllaw.org/2020/09/more-than-200-lawyers-file-judicial-complaint-against-judge-lewis-a-kaplan-over-abusive-targeting-of-human-rights-advocate-steven-donziger/|date=September 1, 2020|place=New York}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://reporterre.net/L-avocat-Steven-Donzinger-harcele-par-la-compagnie-petroliere-Chevron|title=L'avocat Steven Donzinger harcelé par la compagnie pétrolière Chevron|publisher=Reporterre|date=2020-09-09|access-date=2020-09-09}}</ref>
Donziger has accused Kaplan of displaying a pro-corporate bias in the case.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Holmes|first=Jack|date=March 18, 2021|title='I've Been Targeted With Probably the Most Vicious Corporate Counterattack in American History'|url=https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a35812573/steven-donziger-chevron-house-arrest/|access-date=March 19, 2021|website=Esquire|language=en-US}}</ref> At the hearing, Alberto Guerra, a former Ecuadorian judge, testified for Chevron, claiming Donziger bribed him and others to win the case by fraud. Guerra's testimony was cited by Kaplan as a key factor in his decision. In 2015, Guerra claimed his testimony against Donziger had been largely a lie.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/neye7z/chevrons-star-witness-admits-to-lying-in-the-amazon-pollution-case|title=Chevron's Star Witness Admits to Lying in the Amazon Pollution Case|last=Hershaw|first=Eva|date=October 26, 2015|website=Vice|language=en|access-date=April 18, 2020}}</ref> According to ''The Intercept'', Kaplan has written favorably about Chevron and "bypassed the standard random assignment process and handpicked someone he knew well, U.S. District Judge [[Loretta Preska]], to oversee the case being prosecuted by the firm he chose."<ref name="Interecept1" /> Seward & Kissel partner Rita Glavin claimed that the firm did not have a conflict of interest with regards to the case, even though Seward & Kissel has worked with Chevron at least twice, including as recently as 2018.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Government Gave Big Oil the Power to Prosecute Its Biggest Critic|url=https://prospect.org/power/chevron-big-oil-power-prosecute-its-biggest-critic/|last1=Bragman|first1=Walker|last2=Sirota|first2=David|date=July 14, 2020|work=[[The American Prospect]]}}</ref> In September 2020, the [[National Lawyers Guild]] and [[International Association of Democratic Lawyers]] filed a joint complaint against Kaplan over his treatment of Donziger, alleging that “statements and actions of Judge Kaplan over the last ten years show him to have taken on the role of counsel for Chevron … rather than that of a judge adjudicating a live controversy before him.”<ref>{{Cite news|title=More than 200 lawyers file judicial complaint against Judge Lewis A. Kaplan over abusive targeting of human rights advocate Steven Donziger|url=https://iadllaw.org/2020/09/more-than-200-lawyers-file-judicial-complaint-against-judge-lewis-a-kaplan-over-abusive-targeting-of-human-rights-advocate-steven-donziger/|date=September 1, 2020|place=New York}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://reporterre.net/L-avocat-Steven-Donzinger-harcele-par-la-compagnie-petroliere-Chevron|title=L'avocat Steven Donzinger harcelé par la compagnie pétrolière Chevron|publisher=Reporterre|date=September 9, 2020|access-date=September 9, 2020}}</ref>


In 2016, the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|Second Circuit Court of Appeals]] declined to consider Guerra's admissions and unanimously upheld Kaplan's ruling. In March 2021, the Second Circuit heard another appeal by Donziger against prior court orders made by Kaplan in the civil contempt action brought by Chevron. The appeals court found the order barring Donziger from financing his legal defense by selling shares in any future award to be unenforceable. The court also vacated Chevron's request for $4.1 million in damages and a $660,000 sanction against Donziger.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/chevron-donziger-idUSL2N2L22RI|title=Lawyer and Chevron critic Donziger's civil contempt finding mostly upheld; fees and sanctions vacated|first=Jonathan|last=Stempel|publisher=Reuters|date=March 4, 2021|access-date=October 9, 2021|archive-date=March 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210306110944/https://www.reuters.com/article/chevron-donziger-idUSL2N2L22RI|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/chevrons-660-000-sanction-award-against-donziger-nixed-on-appeal|title=Chevron's $660,000 Sanction Award Against Donziger Nixed on Appeal|first=Maya|last=Earls|publisher=Bloomberg Law|date=March 4, 2021|access-date=October 9, 2021|archive-date=March 11, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210311060100/https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/chevrons-660-000-sanction-award-against-donziger-nixed-on-appeal|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2018, the [[Permanent Court of Arbitration]] in [[The Hague]] ruled that the $9.5 billion judgment in Ecuador was marked by fraud and corruption and "should not be recognised or enforced by the courts of other States."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Nagarkatti |last2=McWilliams|first1=Karan |first2=Gary |title=International tribunal rules in favor of Chevron in Ecuador case |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-chevron-ecuador-idUSKCN1LN1WS |access-date=October 9, 2021 |work=Reuters |date=September 7, 2018 |language=en |quote=The tribunal unanimously held that a $9.5 billion pollution judgment by Ecuador’s Supreme Court against Chevron "was procured through fraud, bribery and corruption and was based on claims that had been already settled and released by the Republic of Ecuador years earlier." |archive-date=April 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190413005848/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-chevron-ecuador-idUSKCN1LN1WS |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/tribunal-condemns-ecuadors-9-5-billion-ruling-against-chevron-1536337680?mod=article_inline | title=Tribunal Condemns Ecuador's $9.5 Billion Ruling Against Chevron - Arbitration court in The Hague echoes earlier decisions, bolstering company's campaign to invalidate the 2011 environmental judgment | last=Randazzo | first=Sara | newspaper=[[The Wall Street Journal]] | date=September 7, 2018 | quote=The tribunal found Ecuador released Texaco in 1998 of its cleanup duties after the company spent $40 million on environmental remediation. | access-date= October 9, 2021 |url-access=subscription | archive-date=May 7, 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210507033602/https://www.wsj.com/articles/tribunal-condemns-ecuadors-9-5-billion-ruling-against-chevron-1536337680?mod=article_inline | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=Forbes_2018-09-16 >{{cite news | url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelkrauss/2018/09/16/justice-delayed-but-not-denied-corrupt-ecuadorean-process-fails-in-international-arbitration/ | title=Justice Delayed But Not Denied: Corrupt Ecuadorean Process Fails In International Arbitration | last=Krauss | first=Michael | author-link=Michael I. Krauss | newspaper=[[Forbes]] | date=September 16, 2018 | access-date=October 9, 2021 | archive-date=May 12, 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512134456/https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelkrauss/2018/09/16/justice-delayed-but-not-denied-corrupt-ecuadorean-process-fails-in-international-arbitration/ | url-status=live }}</ref> The Court summarized their findings, "the most thorough documentary, video, and testimonial proof of fraud ever put before an arbitral tribunal", that the plaintiffs engaged in blackmail and bribery of Ecuadorian judges that triggered an order to appoint an "expert" friendly to the plaintiffs, that Ecuadorian prosecutors "actively cooperated" with the plaintiffs, who bribed "experts", ghostwrote a report and paid an ex-judge to draft the acting judge's orders—the same judge solicited bribes that Chevron refused to pay.<ref name=Forbes_2018-09-16 />
In 2016, the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|Second Circuit Court of Appeals]] declined to consider Guerra's admissions and unanimously upheld Kaplan's ruling. In March 2021, the Second Circuit heard another appeal by Donziger against prior court orders made by Kaplan in the civil contempt action brought by Chevron. The appeals court found the order barring Donziger from financing his legal defense by selling shares in any future award to be unenforceable. The court also vacated Chevron's request for $4.1 million in damages and a $660,000 sanction against Donziger.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/chevron-donziger-idUSL2N2L22RI|title=Lawyer and Chevron critic Donziger's civil contempt finding mostly upheld; fees and sanctions vacated|first=Jonathan|last=Stempel|publisher=Reuters|date=March 4, 2021|access-date=October 9, 2021|archive-date=March 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210306110944/https://www.reuters.com/article/chevron-donziger-idUSL2N2L22RI|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/chevrons-660-000-sanction-award-against-donziger-nixed-on-appeal|title=Chevron's $660,000 Sanction Award Against Donziger Nixed on Appeal|first=Maya|last=Earls|publisher=Bloomberg Law|date=March 4, 2021|access-date=October 9, 2021|archive-date=March 11, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210311060100/https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/chevrons-660-000-sanction-award-against-donziger-nixed-on-appeal|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2018, the [[Permanent Court of Arbitration]] in [[The Hague]] ruled that the $9.5 billion judgment in Ecuador was marked by fraud and corruption and "should not be recognised or enforced by the courts of other States."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Nagarkatti |last2=McWilliams|first1=Karan |first2=Gary |title=International tribunal rules in favor of Chevron in Ecuador case |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-chevron-ecuador-idUSKCN1LN1WS |access-date=October 9, 2021 |work=Reuters |date=September 7, 2018 |language=en |quote=The tribunal unanimously held that a $9.5 billion pollution judgment by Ecuador's Supreme Court against Chevron "was procured through fraud, bribery and corruption and was based on claims that had been already settled and released by the Republic of Ecuador years earlier." |archive-date=April 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190413005848/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-chevron-ecuador-idUSKCN1LN1WS |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/tribunal-condemns-ecuadors-9-5-billion-ruling-against-chevron-1536337680?mod=article_inline | title=Tribunal Condemns Ecuador's $9.5 Billion Ruling Against Chevron - Arbitration court in The Hague echoes earlier decisions, bolstering company's campaign to invalidate the 2011 environmental judgment | last=Randazzo | first=Sara | newspaper=[[The Wall Street Journal]] | date=September 7, 2018 | quote=The tribunal found Ecuador released Texaco in 1998 of its cleanup duties after the company spent $40 million on environmental remediation. | access-date= October 9, 2021 |url-access=subscription | archive-date=May 7, 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210507033602/https://www.wsj.com/articles/tribunal-condemns-ecuadors-9-5-billion-ruling-against-chevron-1536337680?mod=article_inline | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=Forbes_2018-09-16 >{{cite news | url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelkrauss/2018/09/16/justice-delayed-but-not-denied-corrupt-ecuadorean-process-fails-in-international-arbitration/ | title=Justice Delayed But Not Denied: Corrupt Ecuadorean Process Fails In International Arbitration | last=Krauss | first=Michael | author-link=Michael I. Krauss | newspaper=[[Forbes]] | date=September 16, 2018 | access-date=October 9, 2021 | archive-date=May 12, 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512134456/https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelkrauss/2018/09/16/justice-delayed-but-not-denied-corrupt-ecuadorean-process-fails-in-international-arbitration/ | url-status=live }}</ref> The Court summarized their findings, "the most thorough documentary, video, and testimonial proof of fraud ever put before an arbitral tribunal", that the plaintiffs engaged in blackmail and bribery of Ecuadorian judges that triggered an order to appoint an "expert" friendly to the plaintiffs, that Ecuadorian prosecutors "actively cooperated" with the plaintiffs, who bribed "experts", ghostwrote a report and paid an ex-judge to draft the acting judge's orders—the same judge solicited bribes that Chevron refused to pay.<ref name=Forbes_2018-09-16 />


In August 2020, following a protracted debate, the New York Court of Appeals disbarred Donziger in New York State.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Stempel |first1=Jonathan |title=Lawyer who took on Chevron in Ecuador is disbarred in New York |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-donziger/lawyer-who-took-on-chevron-in-ecuador-is-disbarred-in-new-york-idUSKCN25A2P4 |work=Reuters |date=August 14, 2020 |language=en |access-date=October 9, 2021 |archive-date=August 22, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200822204501/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-donziger/lawyer-who-took-on-chevron-in-ecuador-is-disbarred-in-new-york-idUSKCN25A2P4 |url-status=live }}</ref>
In August 2020, following a protracted debate, the New York Court of Appeals disbarred Donziger in New York State.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Stempel |first1=Jonathan |title=Lawyer who took on Chevron in Ecuador is disbarred in New York |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-donziger/lawyer-who-took-on-chevron-in-ecuador-is-disbarred-in-new-york-idUSKCN25A2P4 |work=Reuters |date=August 14, 2020 |language=en |access-date=October 9, 2021 |archive-date=August 22, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200822204501/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-donziger/lawyer-who-took-on-chevron-in-ecuador-is-disbarred-in-new-york-idUSKCN25A2P4 |url-status=live }}</ref>


On October 1, 2021, Judge Preska sentenced Donziger to six months in prison.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Malo |first1=Sebastien |title=Lawyer who sued Chevron sentenced to six months in contempt case |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/us/lawyer-who-sued-chevron-sentenced-six-months-contempt-case-2021-10-01/ |access-date=October 1, 2021 |work=Reuters |date=October 1, 2021}}</ref> Donziger appealed the decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but the court denied the appeal in June 2022. In March 2023, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mindock |first=Clark |date=2022-09-21 |title=Chevron adversary Steven Donziger appeals conviction to U.S. Supreme Court |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/chevron-adversary-steven-donziger-appeals-conviction-us-supreme-court-2022-09-21/ |access-date=2023-09-19}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Raymond |first=Nate |date=2023-03-27 |title=U.S. Supreme Court lets Chevron foe Donziger's contempt conviction stand |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-lets-chevron-foe-donzigers-contempt-conviction-stand-2023-03-27/ |access-date=2023-09-19}}</ref>
On October 1, 2021, Judge Preska sentenced Donziger to six months in prison.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Malo |first1=Sebastien |title=Lawyer who sued Chevron sentenced to six months in contempt case |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/us/lawyer-who-sued-chevron-sentenced-six-months-contempt-case-2021-10-01/ |access-date=October 1, 2021 |work=Reuters |date=October 1, 2021}}</ref> Donziger appealed the decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but the court denied the appeal in June 2022. In March 2023, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mindock |first=Clark |date=September 21, 2022 |title=Chevron adversary Steven Donziger appeals conviction to U.S. Supreme Court |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/chevron-adversary-steven-donziger-appeals-conviction-us-supreme-court-2022-09-21/ |access-date=September 19, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Raymond |first=Nate |date=March 27, 2023 |title=U.S. Supreme Court lets Chevron foe Donziger's contempt conviction stand |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-lets-chevron-foe-donzigers-contempt-conviction-stand-2023-03-27/ |access-date=September 19, 2023}}</ref>


=== Miscellaneous ===
==== Miscellaneous ====
Other well-known cases Kaplan has presided over at the district level include ''[[Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.]]'', ''[[Universal v. Reimerdes]]'', ''Five Borough Bicycle Club v. The City of New York'', and ''Crandell v. [[New York College of Osteopathic Medicine]]''.<ref>{{cite book|title=Art and copyright|author=Simon Stokes|publisher=Hart Publishing|year=2001|isbn=978-1-84113-225-9|pages=103–104}}</ref><ref>"Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 111 F. Supp. 2d 294 - Dist. Court, SD New York 2000". Retrieved 2021-10-11.</ref>
Other well-known cases Kaplan has presided over at the district level include ''[[Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.]]'', ''[[Universal v. Reimerdes]]'', ''Five Borough Bicycle Club v. The City of New York'', and ''Crandell v. [[New York College of Osteopathic Medicine]]''.<ref>{{cite book|title=Art and copyright|author=Simon Stokes|publisher=Hart Publishing|year=2001|isbn=978-1-84113-225-9|pages=103–104}}</ref><ref>"Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 111 F. Supp. 2d 294 - Dist. Court, SD New York 2000". Retrieved October 11, 2021.</ref>


In the 2005 case ''[[Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co.]]'', Kaplan, finding existing case law on what constituted protectable originality in a photograph for copyright purposes, outlined three aspects—rendition, timing, and creation of the subject—that met that criterion and have been used by other courts.<ref>{{cite court|litigants=Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co.|vol=377|reporter=[[Federal Reporter|F.Supp.2d]]|opinion=444|court=[[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York|S.D.N.Y.]]|year=2005|url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16977894138805983217}}</ref>
From 2021 to 2022, Kaplan was the presiding judge on matters relating to ''[[Virginia Giuffre v. Prince Andrew]]'' over allegations of sexual assault.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Pavia|first1=Will|last2=Low|first2=Valentine|date=2022-01-04|title=Prince Andrew hearing: Judge Kaplan deals blow to duke's hopes of having Virginia Giuffre case dismissed|language=en|work=[[The Times]]|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/prince-andrew-accuser-virginia-giuffres-key-500-000-settlement-with-jeffrey-epstein-unsealed-jdfstwqrl|url-access=subscription|access-date=2022-01-04|issn=0140-0460}}</ref>


From 2021 to 2022, Kaplan was the presiding judge on matters relating to ''[[Virginia Giuffre v. Prince Andrew]]'' over allegations of sexual assault.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Pavia|first1=Will|last2=Low|first2=Valentine|date=January 4, 2022|title=Prince Andrew hearing: Judge Kaplan deals blow to duke's hopes of having Virginia Giuffre case dismissed|language=en|work=[[The Times]]|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/prince-andrew-accuser-virginia-giuffres-key-500-000-settlement-with-jeffrey-epstein-unsealed-jdfstwqrl|url-access=subscription|access-date=January 4, 2022|issn=0140-0460}}</ref>
In 2023 Judge Kaplan presided over [[E. Jean Carroll vs. Donald J. Trump|the civil trial]] by [[E. Jean Carroll]] against [[Donald Trump]] for sexual assault and defamation.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Shapero |first1=Julia |title=Judge in E. Jean Carroll's suit against Trump says jury can hear other accusers, 'Access Hollywood' tape |url=https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3894535-judge-in-e-jean-carrolls-suit-against-trump-says-jury-can-hear-other-accusers-access-hollywood-tape/ |access-date=May 4, 2023 |work=The Hill |date=March 10, 2023}}</ref> Kaplan found Trump liable on September 6, 2023, and set the matter for a damages only trial.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/06/trump-suffers-big-loss-in-e-jean-carroll-defamation-case-judge-says-hes-liable.html | title=Trump suffers big loss in E. Jean Carroll defamation case, judge says he's liable | website=[[CNBC]] | date=September 6, 2023 }}</ref>


In 2023 Judge Kaplan presided over [[E. Jean Carroll vs. Donald J. Trump|the civil trial]] by [[E. Jean Carroll]] against [[Donald Trump]] for sexual assault and defamation.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Shapero |first1=Julia |title=Judge in E. Jean Carroll's suit against Trump says jury can hear other accusers, 'Access Hollywood' tape |url=https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3894535-judge-in-e-jean-carrolls-suit-against-trump-says-jury-can-hear-other-accusers-access-hollywood-tape/ |access-date=May 4, 2023 |work=The Hill |date=March 10, 2023}}</ref> A jury found Trump liable on September 6, 2023, and set the matter for a damages only trial.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/06/trump-suffers-big-loss-in-e-jean-carroll-defamation-case-judge-says-hes-liable.html | title=Trump suffers big loss in E. Jean Carroll defamation case, judge says he's liable | website=[[CNBC]] | date=September 6, 2023 }}</ref>
In 2022 and 2023, Kaplan presided over the [[United States v. Bankman-Fried|criminal case against Sam Bankman-Fried]] over the [[Bankruptcy of FTX|collapse]] of the cryptocurrency exchange [[FTX]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Weiser |first=Benjamin |date=2023-04-27 |title=Who is Lewis Kaplan, Judge in Carroll Case Against Trump? |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/27/nyregion/who-is-lewis-kaplan-judge-in-carroll-case-against-trump.html |access-date=2023-09-19 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref>

In 2022 and 2023, Kaplan presided over the [[United States v. Bankman-Fried|criminal case against Sam Bankman-Fried]] over the [[Bankruptcy of FTX|collapse]] of the cryptocurrency exchange [[FTX]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Weiser |first=Benjamin |date=April 27, 2023 |title=Who is Lewis Kaplan, Judge in Carroll Case Against Trump? |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/27/nyregion/who-is-lewis-kaplan-judge-in-carroll-case-against-trump.html |access-date=September 19, 2023 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref>


== Awards ==
== Awards ==
In 2007, the New York State Bar Association awarded Kaplan the [[Stanley H. Fuld]] Award for outstanding contributions to the development of commercial law and jurisprudence in New York.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://nysba.org/awards-competitions/commercial-and-federal-litigation-section-stanley-h-fuld-award|title=Commercial and Federal Litigation Section: Stanley H. Fuld Award - New York State Bar Association|publisher=New York State Bar Association|date=2019-12-23|access-date=2020-12-29}}</ref> The Federal Bar Council awarded Kaplan the Learned Hand Medal for excellence in federal jurisprudence in 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://judges.newyorklawjournal.com/profile/U.S._Southern_District,_New_York/Lewis_Kaplan/Lewis_Kaplan-100080.xml|title=New York Law Journal: Judges Profiles: Lewis Kaplan|publisher=New York Law Journal|access-date=2020-12-29}}</ref>
In 2007, the New York State Bar Association awarded Kaplan the [[Stanley H. Fuld]] Award for outstanding contributions to the development of commercial law and jurisprudence in New York.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://nysba.org/awards-competitions/commercial-and-federal-litigation-section-stanley-h-fuld-award|title=Commercial and Federal Litigation Section: Stanley H. Fuld Award - New York State Bar Association|publisher=New York State Bar Association|date=December 23, 2019|access-date=December 29, 2020}}</ref> The Federal Bar Council awarded Kaplan the Learned Hand Medal for excellence in federal jurisprudence in 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://judges.newyorklawjournal.com/profile/U.S._Southern_District,_New_York/Lewis_Kaplan/Lewis_Kaplan-100080.xml|title=New York Law Journal: Judges Profiles: Lewis Kaplan|publisher=New York Law Journal|access-date=December 29, 2020}}</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 114: Line 117:
[[Category:1944 births]]
[[Category:1944 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:University of Rochester alumni]]
[[Category:20th-century American Jews]]
[[Category:20th-century American judges]]
[[Category:20th-century American lawyers]]
[[Category:21st-century American Jews]]
[[Category:21st-century American judges]]
[[Category:Harvard Law School alumni]]
[[Category:Harvard Law School alumni]]
[[Category:Judges of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]]
[[Category:Judges of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]]
[[Category:Lawyers from New York City]]
[[Category:Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison people]]
[[Category:People from Staten Island]]
[[Category:United States district court judges appointed by Bill Clinton]]
[[Category:United States district court judges appointed by Bill Clinton]]
[[Category:People from Staten Island]]
[[Category:University of Rochester alumni]]
[[Category:20th-century American judges]]
[[Category:21st-century American judges]]

Latest revision as of 15:16, 5 November 2024

Lewis A. Kaplan
Kaplan in 2014
Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Assumed office
February 1, 2011
Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
In office
August 10, 1994 – February 1, 2011
Appointed byBill Clinton
Preceded byGerard Louis Goettel
Succeeded byRonnie Abrams
Personal details
Born (1944-12-23) December 23, 1944 (age 79)
New York City, U.S.
Spouse
Lesley Oelsner
(m. 2004)
EducationUniversity of Rochester (BA)
Harvard University (JD)

Lewis Avins Kaplan (born December 23, 1944)[1] is an American lawyer and jurist who serves as a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.[2] He was the presiding judge in a number of cases involving high-profile defendants, including E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump, Virginia Giuffre v. Prince Andrew, United States v. Bankman-Fried, and trials of Al Qaeda terrorists such as Ahmed Ghailani.

Education, career, personal life

[edit]

Kaplan was born in 1944 in Staten Island, New York. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Rochester in 1966 and a Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in 1969.[3]

After law school, Kaplan was a law clerk for Judge Edward McEntee of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, from 1969 to 1970. He then entered private practice at the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, becoming a partner in 1977. From 1982 to 1983, he served as a Special Master for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. During his time in the private sector, Kaplan represented Phillip Morris.[4]

He married former New York Times reporter and former vice president of Random House Lesley Oelsner on February 29, 2004.[5]

Federal judicial service

[edit]

On May 5, 1994, Kaplan was nominated by President Bill Clinton to a seat on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York vacated by Judge Gerard Louis Goettel. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on August 9, 1994, and received his commission on August 10, 1994. He took senior status on February 1, 2011.[3]

Notable cases

[edit]

Guantanamo detainees

[edit]

Kaplan presided over the first case in which charges against Guantanamo captives were laid in a civilian court. On February 9, 2010, Kaplan ordered Ahmed Ghailani's prosecution to review the record of Ghailani's detention in the CIA's network of black sites.[6]

According to The New York Times any materials that show the decisions "were for a purpose other than national security," must be turned over to Ghailani's lawyers. He denied a motion to dismiss the charges on the grounds that due to Ghailani's long extrajudicial detention he was denied the constitutional right to a speedy trial, ruling that his extended incarceration had no adverse impact on Mr. Ghailani's ability to defend himself. This cleared the way for federal prosecutors to try him for his suspected role in Al Qaeda's 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.[7]The New York Times reported that Kaplan's ruling could set a precedent for the cases of other Guantanamo captives, who, like Ghailani, are transferred to the civilian justice system. On January 25, 2011, Kaplan sentenced Ghailani to life and called the attacks "horrific" and saying the deaths and damage they caused far outweighs "any and all considerations that have been advanced on behalf of the defendant." He also ordered Ghailani to pay $33 million as restitution.[8]

Organized crime

[edit]

Working in New York City, Kaplan had been the judge in a number of federal racketeering cases involving Mafia members. In April 2010, Kaplan was assigned to preside over the cases of 14 Gambino crime family members arrested on charges, among others, of racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, witness tampering (in the 1992 trial of John Gotti), and sex trafficking of a minor.

In 2016-2017 Kaplan presided over US v. Spoutz, one of the first cases of successful prosecution of attributed artwork in the United States. Eric Spoutz, an art dealer, pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud related to the sale of falsely attributed artwork accompanied by forged provenance documents. Kaplan sentenced him to 41 months in federal prison and ordered to forfeit the $1.45 million he made from the scheme and pay $154,100 in restitution.[9]

Chevron v. Donziger

[edit]

Kaplan presided over and ruled in favor of Chevron's appeal of a major environmental case. It had originally been brought successfully on behalf of Ecuadorian indigenous tribes against Texaco-Chevron. Kaplan granted Chevron's motion barring enforcement of an almost $10 billion judgment awarded by the Ecuadorian courts against the company in February 2011. Lawyers for Chevron argued the ruling was illegitimate due to foul play on the part of the plaintiffs in the case who allegedly introduced fabricated evidence and bribed witnesses and officials involved in the case. Kaplan found there to be overwhelming evidence that the Ecuadorian verdict was the result of a criminal conspiracy spear-headed by the plaintiff's lead attorney, Steven Donziger. In a ruling in July 2019, Kaplan fined Donziger $3.4 million for contempt and for Chevron's legal fees, the largest contempt sanction in US history.[10][11]

Donziger was unable to satisfy the contempt fine and restitution award so Kaplan ordered he surrender certain personal items of his such as cell phones and computers. These devices were to be handed over to Chevron employees trying to locate any assets Donziger may have concealed. Donziger refused to comply on the grounds doing so would be a breach of attorney-client privilege. In response, Kaplan found Donziger in criminal contempt and referred the case for prosecution. When the SDNY US Attorney's Office declined to pursue the case in August 2019, Kaplan appointed a private law firm, Seward & Kissel to prosecute Donziger.[12]

Donziger has accused Kaplan of displaying a pro-corporate bias in the case.[13] At the hearing, Alberto Guerra, a former Ecuadorian judge, testified for Chevron, claiming Donziger bribed him and others to win the case by fraud. Guerra's testimony was cited by Kaplan as a key factor in his decision. In 2015, Guerra claimed his testimony against Donziger had been largely a lie.[14] According to The Intercept, Kaplan has written favorably about Chevron and "bypassed the standard random assignment process and handpicked someone he knew well, U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska, to oversee the case being prosecuted by the firm he chose."[11] Seward & Kissel partner Rita Glavin claimed that the firm did not have a conflict of interest with regards to the case, even though Seward & Kissel has worked with Chevron at least twice, including as recently as 2018.[15] In September 2020, the National Lawyers Guild and International Association of Democratic Lawyers filed a joint complaint against Kaplan over his treatment of Donziger, alleging that “statements and actions of Judge Kaplan over the last ten years show him to have taken on the role of counsel for Chevron … rather than that of a judge adjudicating a live controversy before him.”[16][17]

In 2016, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals declined to consider Guerra's admissions and unanimously upheld Kaplan's ruling. In March 2021, the Second Circuit heard another appeal by Donziger against prior court orders made by Kaplan in the civil contempt action brought by Chevron. The appeals court found the order barring Donziger from financing his legal defense by selling shares in any future award to be unenforceable. The court also vacated Chevron's request for $4.1 million in damages and a $660,000 sanction against Donziger.[18][19] In 2018, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled that the $9.5 billion judgment in Ecuador was marked by fraud and corruption and "should not be recognised or enforced by the courts of other States."[20][21][22] The Court summarized their findings, "the most thorough documentary, video, and testimonial proof of fraud ever put before an arbitral tribunal", that the plaintiffs engaged in blackmail and bribery of Ecuadorian judges that triggered an order to appoint an "expert" friendly to the plaintiffs, that Ecuadorian prosecutors "actively cooperated" with the plaintiffs, who bribed "experts", ghostwrote a report and paid an ex-judge to draft the acting judge's orders—the same judge solicited bribes that Chevron refused to pay.[22]

In August 2020, following a protracted debate, the New York Court of Appeals disbarred Donziger in New York State.[23]

On October 1, 2021, Judge Preska sentenced Donziger to six months in prison.[24] Donziger appealed the decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but the court denied the appeal in June 2022. In March 2023, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case.[25][26]

Miscellaneous

[edit]

Other well-known cases Kaplan has presided over at the district level include Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp., Universal v. Reimerdes, Five Borough Bicycle Club v. The City of New York, and Crandell v. New York College of Osteopathic Medicine.[27][28]

In the 2005 case Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co., Kaplan, finding existing case law on what constituted protectable originality in a photograph for copyright purposes, outlined three aspects—rendition, timing, and creation of the subject—that met that criterion and have been used by other courts.[29]

From 2021 to 2022, Kaplan was the presiding judge on matters relating to Virginia Giuffre v. Prince Andrew over allegations of sexual assault.[30]

In 2023 Judge Kaplan presided over the civil trial by E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump for sexual assault and defamation.[31] A jury found Trump liable on September 6, 2023, and set the matter for a damages only trial.[32]

In 2022 and 2023, Kaplan presided over the criminal case against Sam Bankman-Fried over the collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX.[33]

Awards

[edit]

In 2007, the New York State Bar Association awarded Kaplan the Stanley H. Fuld Award for outstanding contributions to the development of commercial law and jurisprudence in New York.[34] The Federal Bar Council awarded Kaplan the Learned Hand Medal for excellence in federal jurisprudence in 2009.[35]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Hearings before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Third Congress, Second Session, on Confirmations of Appointees to the Federal Judiciary, June 21, 29, 30; July 21; August 3 and 11, 1994. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1996. p. 81.
  2. ^ "The Government Gave Big Oil the Power to Prosecute Its Biggest Critic". July 14, 2020.
  3. ^ a b Lewis A. Kaplan at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges, a publication of the Federal Judicial Center.
  4. ^ Frankel, Alison (January 1, 2006). "The Lifesavers". The American Lawyer. Retrieved September 9, 2020.
  5. ^ "Weddings/Celebrations; Lesley Oelsner, Lewis Kaplan". The New York Times. February 29, 2004. Retrieved November 25, 2019.
  6. ^ Benjamin Weiser (February 10, 2010). "U.S. Told to Review Files on Terror Case Detention". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 29, 2018.
  7. ^ Benjamin Weiser (July 13, 2010). "Judge Refuses to Dismiss Terror Suspect's Case". The New York Times.
  8. ^ "Gitmo Detainee Gets Life Sentence in Embassy Plot". The New York Times.
  9. ^ "Forging Papers to Sell Fake Art". Federal Bureau of Investigation (press release). April 6, 2017.
  10. ^ "Suspended lawyer ordered to pay $3.4M in attorney fees to Chevron as contempt sanction".
  11. ^ a b Lerner, Sharon (January 29, 2020). "How the environmental lawyer who won a massive judgement against Chevron lost everything". The Intercept.
  12. ^ "When Feds Demur, Judge Charges Ecuador Crusader Himself". Courthouse News. August 13, 2019.
  13. ^ Holmes, Jack (March 18, 2021). "'I've Been Targeted With Probably the Most Vicious Corporate Counterattack in American History'". Esquire. Retrieved March 19, 2021.
  14. ^ Hershaw, Eva (October 26, 2015). "Chevron's Star Witness Admits to Lying in the Amazon Pollution Case". Vice. Retrieved April 18, 2020.
  15. ^ Bragman, Walker; Sirota, David (July 14, 2020). "The Government Gave Big Oil the Power to Prosecute Its Biggest Critic". The American Prospect.
  16. ^ "More than 200 lawyers file judicial complaint against Judge Lewis A. Kaplan over abusive targeting of human rights advocate Steven Donziger". New York. September 1, 2020.
  17. ^ "L'avocat Steven Donzinger harcelé par la compagnie pétrolière Chevron". Reporterre. September 9, 2020. Retrieved September 9, 2020.
  18. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (March 4, 2021). "Lawyer and Chevron critic Donziger's civil contempt finding mostly upheld; fees and sanctions vacated". Reuters. Archived from the original on March 6, 2021. Retrieved October 9, 2021.
  19. ^ Earls, Maya (March 4, 2021). "Chevron's $660,000 Sanction Award Against Donziger Nixed on Appeal". Bloomberg Law. Archived from the original on March 11, 2021. Retrieved October 9, 2021.
  20. ^ Nagarkatti, Karan; McWilliams, Gary (September 7, 2018). "International tribunal rules in favor of Chevron in Ecuador case". Reuters. Archived from the original on April 13, 2019. Retrieved October 9, 2021. The tribunal unanimously held that a $9.5 billion pollution judgment by Ecuador's Supreme Court against Chevron "was procured through fraud, bribery and corruption and was based on claims that had been already settled and released by the Republic of Ecuador years earlier."
  21. ^ Randazzo, Sara (September 7, 2018). "Tribunal Condemns Ecuador's $9.5 Billion Ruling Against Chevron - Arbitration court in The Hague echoes earlier decisions, bolstering company's campaign to invalidate the 2011 environmental judgment". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved October 9, 2021. The tribunal found Ecuador released Texaco in 1998 of its cleanup duties after the company spent $40 million on environmental remediation.
  22. ^ a b Krauss, Michael (September 16, 2018). "Justice Delayed But Not Denied: Corrupt Ecuadorean Process Fails In International Arbitration". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 12, 2021. Retrieved October 9, 2021.
  23. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (August 14, 2020). "Lawyer who took on Chevron in Ecuador is disbarred in New York". Reuters. Archived from the original on August 22, 2020. Retrieved October 9, 2021.
  24. ^ Malo, Sebastien (October 1, 2021). "Lawyer who sued Chevron sentenced to six months in contempt case". Reuters. Retrieved October 1, 2021.
  25. ^ Mindock, Clark (September 21, 2022). "Chevron adversary Steven Donziger appeals conviction to U.S. Supreme Court". Reuters. Retrieved September 19, 2023.
  26. ^ Raymond, Nate (March 27, 2023). "U.S. Supreme Court lets Chevron foe Donziger's contempt conviction stand". Reuters. Retrieved September 19, 2023.
  27. ^ Simon Stokes (2001). Art and copyright. Hart Publishing. pp. 103–104. ISBN 978-1-84113-225-9.
  28. ^ "Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 111 F. Supp. 2d 294 - Dist. Court, SD New York 2000". Retrieved October 11, 2021.
  29. ^ Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co., 377 F.Supp.2d 444 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).
  30. ^ Pavia, Will; Low, Valentine (January 4, 2022). "Prince Andrew hearing: Judge Kaplan deals blow to duke's hopes of having Virginia Giuffre case dismissed". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved January 4, 2022.
  31. ^ Shapero, Julia (March 10, 2023). "Judge in E. Jean Carroll's suit against Trump says jury can hear other accusers, 'Access Hollywood' tape". The Hill. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  32. ^ "Trump suffers big loss in E. Jean Carroll defamation case, judge says he's liable". CNBC. September 6, 2023.
  33. ^ Weiser, Benjamin (April 27, 2023). "Who is Lewis Kaplan, Judge in Carroll Case Against Trump?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved September 19, 2023.
  34. ^ "Commercial and Federal Litigation Section: Stanley H. Fuld Award - New York State Bar Association". New York State Bar Association. December 23, 2019. Retrieved December 29, 2020.
  35. ^ "New York Law Journal: Judges Profiles: Lewis Kaplan". New York Law Journal. Retrieved December 29, 2020.
[edit]
Legal offices
Preceded by Judge of the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York

1994–2011
Succeeded by