User talk:SLBedit: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 00:32, 19 November 2024

SLBedit, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SLBedit! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, SLBedit. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! smileguy91^talk 03:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Thank you for correcting me. — Ekin^(talk·@) 14:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, SLBedit!

Happy New Year!

SLBedit,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 22:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 22:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexis Scholl for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexis Scholl, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Scholl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 {{clear}}<!-- From template:Happy New Year fireworks --> <span style="color: blue">—</span> [[User:Moops|<span style="color: green ">Moops</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠[[User talk:Moops|<span style="color: indigo">'''T'''</span>]]⋡</span></sup> 22:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
+== Nomination of [[:Alexis Scholl]] for deletion ==
-== Benfica under-23 team ==
+<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Alexis Scholl]], to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Alexis_Scholl significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
+The discussion will take place at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Scholl]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
-Hi! I saw we don't have an article to talk about the Benfica's under-23 team. The [[S.L. Benfica (youth)]] page don't mention anything about that and the [[S.L. Benfica B]] page just mention in one sentence. Do you have any idea? Should we create a own new article, or add all the information about the Benfica's under-23 team in some of the existing articles? [[User:BigLordFlash|BigLordFlash]] ([[User talk:BigLordFlash|talk]]) 13:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
-:{{re|BigLordFlash}} Good question. I don't know if it's notable enough to have an article. If I'm not mistaken, the U23 isn't a professional team, nor it competes in a professional league (which doesn't have an article), despite having professional players. A while ago I added a sentence about U23 in the Benfica B article because it isn't part of youth system, so it wouldn't fit in the youth article. Maybe we could add more information about U23 in the B article? [[User:SLBedit|SLBedit]] ([[User talk:SLBedit#top|talk]]) 21:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
-::{{re|SLBedit}} Yes I was also thinking to add more information about U23 team in the B article. I'm going to add a section about the under-23 current squad and maybe a season-to-season record, because they don't have honours yet. [[User:BigLordFlash|BigLordFlash]] ([[User talk:BigLordFlash|talk]]) 11:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
-:::{{ping|BigLordFlash}} Can you find a source explaining/showing the purpose (if there's one) of Liga Revelação? Then we could expand the small sentence in the article's lead. [[User:SLBedit|SLBedit]] ([[User talk:SLBedit#top|talk]]) 18:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
-::::{{ping|SLBedit}} I found this [https://www.dn.pt/desportos/liga-revelacao-estreia-este-sabado-sabe-como-funciona-9729630.html link] which explains everything about the competition. [[User:BigLordFlash|BigLordFlash]] ([[User talk:BigLordFlash|talk]]) 14:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
+To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->
-==See also==
-Yes, because navboxes do not appear on mobile so an entry there cannot be counted as an appearance when it comes to See also. [[User:Randy Kryn|Randy Kryn]] ([[User talk:Randy Kryn|talk]]) 00:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
-== SL Benfica loan players ==
+== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
+<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
-Hey, just wondering why you removed Henrique Araújo and Tiago Dantas from the "Players on loan" in Benfica's page, they are on loan from the club to Famalicão and AZ.
+<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
+<div class="ivmbox-text">
+Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
+The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
-Also, shouldn't Gonçalo Ramos keep his number 88? Since he is technically on loan (even if it's an obligation to buy) and nobody else has taken that number, isn't it theoretically still his?
+If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
-Best regards. [[User:JoaoSPinto18|JoaoSPinto18]] ([[User talk:JoaoSPinto18|talk]]) 11:07, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
-:{{re|JoaoSPinto18}} Because they last played for Benfica B – there's a footnote in the article explaining this. Also, please read [[Talk:S.L._Benfica/Archive_2#Players_on_loan]].
+</div>
-:Before the loan, Ramos' shirt number was no longer "88", but "8", which now belongs to Fredrik Aursnes. [[User:SLBedit|SLBedit]] ([[User talk:SLBedit#top|talk]]) 23:08, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
+</div>
-::Got it about the B team players, thanks for clearing that up.
+<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1258243594 -->
-::About Ramos, you are right that he no longer wore 88 when he left, but he didn't wear 8 either (last season Aursnes was already in Benfica and he wore 8). He changed to number 9 a few days before moving to PSG (https://www.record.pt/futebol/futebol-nacional/liga-betclic/benfica/detalhe/goncalo-ramos-troca-de-numero-e-herda-o-9-de-yaremchuk). [[User:JoaoSPinto18|JoaoSPinto18]] ([[User talk:JoaoSPinto18|talk]]) 23:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
-:::Well, both Liga Portugal and Benfica showed Ramos number as <s>8</s> 9 before he left. [[User:SLBedit|SLBedit]] ([[User talk:SLBedit#top|talk]]) 23:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
-:::But yeah, 9 now belongs to Cabral so let's keep it like you said! Thank you! [[User:JoaoSPinto18|JoaoSPinto18]] ([[User talk:JoaoSPinto18|talk]]) 23:29, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
-:::You are right, Ramos' number was 9. [[User:SLBedit|SLBedit]] ([[User talk:SLBedit#top|talk]]) 23:32, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
-{{ping|JoaoSPinto18}} About the "PSG" and "Wolves" choice, it's just to keep it short without the need for <nowiki><small></nowiki> tags. [[User:SLBedit|SLBedit]] ([[User talk:SLBedit#top|talk]]) 23:37, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
-:Looks great! Keep up the good work! [[User:JoaoSPinto18|JoaoSPinto18]] ([[User talk:JoaoSPinto18|talk]]) 23:39, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
-== October 2023 ==
-[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:O Clássico]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
-'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period.  Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.  Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''You've been blocked for this sort of thing twice already this year. I strongly suggest you make a point of proactively engaging editors you disagree with. More of this sort of behaviour will result in a substantially longer block.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Sir Sputnik|Sir Sputnik]] ([[User talk:Sir Sputnik|talk]]) 22:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)