Jump to content

Nicholas Krushenick: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Collections: trim indiscriminate which is also (like the other one) entirely unsourced
since I don't particularly care about the "restore your integrity" PA et cetera; I'll just put this back in without any comment on the multiple unsourced statements
Line 1: Line 1:
{{COI|date=May 2017}}
{{Infobox artist
{{Infobox artist
| name = Nicholas Krushenick
| name = Nicholas Krushenick
Line 21: Line 20:
}}
}}


'''Nicholas Krushenick''' (May 31, 1929 &ndash; February 5, 1999) was an American abstract painter whose artistic style straddled the line between [[Op Art]], [[Pop Art]], [[Abstract Expressionism]], [[Minimalism]] and [[Color Field]]. He was active in the New York art scene in the 1960s and 1970s, before he withdrew and focused his time as a professor at the University of Maryland for almost thirty years until his death in 1999. Initially experimenting with a more Abstract Expressionist inspired style and cut paper collage, Krushenick is more well known for his paintings which use bold Liquitex colors and juxtaposing black lines, which fall under the category of pop abstraction. In fact, he is a singular figure within that style.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Smith |first1=Roberta |title=Nicholas Krushenick, 70, Abstract and Pop Artist |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1999/02/07/nyregion/nicholas-krushenick-70-abstract-and-pop-artist.html |url-access=subscription |website=The New York Times |accessdate=18 May 2019 |date=7 February 1999}}</ref>
'''Nicholas Krushenick''' (May 31, 1929 &ndash; February 5, 1999) was an American abstract painter whose mature artistic style straddled [[Op Art]], [[Pop Art]], [[Minimalism]] and [[Color Field]]. He was active in the New York art scene from the late 1950s to the late 1970s, when he largely withdrew from the city and focused his time as a professor at the University of Maryland. Initially experimenting with a more derivative Abstract Expressionist style, by the mid-1960s he had developed his own unique approach, painting increasingly decisive compositions marked by bold, colorful, geometric fields and forms distinguished and flattened by strong black lines, in a style that eventually became known as Pop abstraction. In 1984, when the biographical dictionary ''World Artists, 1950-1980'' observed that Krushenick "has been called the only truly abstract Pop painter," his legacy had already emerged.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Marks|first=Claude|title=World Artists, 1950-1980|publisher=H.W. Wilson Company|year=1984|isbn=0-8242-0707-6|location=New York, NY|pages=457}}</ref> Today, as other artists have been carefully folded into the same elusive genre, he is not only considered a singular figure within that style but also its pioneer, earning him the title "the father of Pop abstraction."<ref>{{Cite web|last=Westfall|first=Stephen|last2=Westfall|first2=Stephen|date=2015-02-01|title=Inventing Pop Abstraction|url=https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/features/inventing-pop-abstraction-63057/|access-date=2021-02-12|website=ARTnews.com|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Westfall|first=Stephen|last2=Westfall|first2=Stephen|date=2012-01-06|title=Nicholas Krushenick|url=https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/aia-reviews/nicholas-krushenick-61092/|access-date=2021-02-12|website=ARTnews.com|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Berry|first=Ian|title=Nicholas Krushenick: Electric Soup|publisher=DelMonico Books Prestel|year=2016|isbn=978-3-7913-5618-1|location=New York, NY|pages=9}}</ref>


==Biography==
==Biography==


Born in [[New York City]] in 1929, Krushenick dropped out of high school, served in [[World War II]], worked on constructing the [[Major Deegan Expressway]], and then returned to art school, with the help of the [[GI Bill]]. He attended the [[Art Students League of New York]] (1948&ndash;1950) and the [[Hans Hofmann]] School of Fine Art (1950–1951). In the early 1950s Krushenick supported himself and his family by designing window displays for department stores and working for the [[Whitney Museum of American Art|Whitney]] and [[Metropolitan Museum of Art|Metropolitan]] museums and the [[Museum of Modern Art]].<ref>Marks, C. (1984). ''World Artists 1950 - 1980''. University of Michigan. {{ISBN|9780824207076}}</ref> In 1957, he and his brother, [[John Krushenick]], opened a framing shop on Tenth Street, which quickly turned into an artists' cooperative called [[10th Street galleries|Brata Gallery]]. Artists such as [[Al Held]], [[Ronald Bladen]], [[Ed Clark]], [[Yayoi Kusama]], and [[George Sugarman]] exhibited there. In 1962, Krushenick left the gallery and began receiving solo-exhibitions around the world. In the 1960s and 1970s, he was a prominent painter in the New York art scene. However, in his later years, Krushenick taught at the [[University of Maryland, College Park]] from 1977 to 1991. He died in New York on February 5, 1999, at age 69.
Born in [[New York City]] in 1929 into a working-class family, Krushenick dropped out of high school, served in [[World War II]], worked on constructing the [[Major Deegan Expressway]], and then enrolled in art school with the help of the [[GI Bill]], attending the [[Art Students League of New York]] (1948&ndash;1950) and the [[Hans Hofmann]] School of Fine Art (1950–1951). In the early 1950s, Krushenick supported himself and his family by designing window displays for department stores and working for the [[Whitney Museum of American Art|Whitney]] and [[Metropolitan Museum of Art|Metropolitan]] museums and the [[Museum of Modern Art]].<ref>Marks, C. (1984). ''World Artists 1950 - 1980''. University of Michigan. {{ISBN|9780824207076}}</ref>

Then, from April 21 to May 10, 1956, Krushenick showed his work to the public for the first time. The occasion was ''The Brothers Krushenick: Paintings - Glassprints - Collages'', a joint exhibition with his brother [[John Krushenick]] at the co-op, [[10th Street galleries#Camino Gallery, 1956–1963|Camino Gallery]], to which the brothers belonged. Nicholas's first solo show, titled ''Nicholas Krushenick: Recent Paintings'', debuted at the same gallery, on January 25, 1957.

Later that year, after becoming frustrated with the internal politics of Camino, the brothers left and opened a framing shop in a nearby storefront, which quickly turned into the artists' cooperative [[10th Street galleries|Brata Gallery]]. Nicholas later recounted that it was John who devised the name, from the Russian "brata" meaning "brothers."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Yau|first=John|title=Nicholas Krushenick: A Survey|publisher=Distributed Art Publishers, Inc.|year=2012|isbn=978-0-9829747-3-5|location=New York, NY|pages=116}}</ref> Along with Camino and others, Brata became one of the now-famed [[10th Street galleries]], which nurtured and galvanized experimental artists by allowing them to sidestep the conservative uptown galleries that had dominated and, from a certain point of view, stifled the New York arts scene. With members including [[Al Held]], [[Ronald Bladen]], [[Ed Clark]], [[Yayoi Kusama]], and [[George Sugarman]], Brata was "one of the most significant of the Tenth Street cooperatives which for a time were the most important launching pads for new artists."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Berry|first=Ian|title=Nicholas Krushenick: Electric Soup|publisher=DelMonico Books • Prestel|year=2016|isbn=978-3-7913-5618-1|location=New York, NY|pages=26}}</ref> Nicholas had solo shows at Brata in 1958 and 1960.

After leaving Brata in 1962, increasingly prominent exhibitions followed, including solo shows at New York City's Graham Gallery in 1962 and 1964 and Fischbach Gallery in 1965. In 1966, he enjoyed his first solo effort in Europe, exhibiting at Galerie Müller in Stuttgart, Germany. In 1967, he gave solo shows in what were then the twin capitals of the art world, at Pace Gallery in New York City and Galerie Sonnabend in Paris, as well as in Detroit, Michigan, and Vienna, Austria, while also receiving a prestigious fine arts fellowship from the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Fellows: Nicholas Krushenick|url=https://www.gf.org/fellows/all-fellows/nicholas-krushenick/|url-status=live}}</ref> In 1968, the Center Opera Company of the [[Walker Art Center]] in Minneapolis, Minnesota, commissioned him to design the sets and costumes for a production of ''The Man in the Moon'', held in conjunction with a large survey of his works at the Center. Solo exhibitionns at Harcus-Krakow Gallery in Boston, Massachusetts, and Galerie Renée Ziegler in Zurich, Switzerland, soon followed. In 1969, on the heels of another solo at [[Pace Gallery]], Krushenick was the Fall term Artist-In-Residence at [[Dartmouth College]]'s [[Hopkins Center for the Arts]], where he mentored students and created new works, culminating in an exhibition of paintings and prints at the college's [https://studioart.dartmouth.edu/exhibitions Jaffe-Friede Gallery].<ref>Wysocki, Matthew (1969). "Nicholas Krushenick: Fall term Artist-In-Residence." Exhibition booklet, Jaffe-Fried Gallery, Dartmouth College. Published by Nimrod Press in Boston, MA.</ref> This was not his first experience as an educator; earlier that year, he had served as a visiting critic at Yale University, and in years past, he had accepted invitations to work as a visiting artist at the School of Visual Arts in New York, the University of Wisconsin in Madison, and others.

Along the way, Krushenick's work appeared in seminal midcentury surveys at the [[Los Angeles County Museum of Art]] and the [[Art Gallery of Toronto]] in 1964; at New York's [[Whitney Museum of American Art]] and [[Museum of Modern Art]], as well as Washington DC's [[Corcoran Gallery of Art]], in 1965; at the [[Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum]] in 1966; and as part of the United States Pavilion at the blockbuster 1967 World's Fair, a.k.a. [[Expo 67]], held in Montreal, Canada. By the late 1960s, Krushenick was one of New York's and indeed the world's elite painters. But even as his work was accepted and celebrated by major institutions, he viewed himself, with some satisfaction, as an outsider. As he told the curator and art historian Paul Cummings during an interview in 1968, critics and other observers have "never really pigeonholed me... Like I'm out in left field all by myself. And that's just where I want to stay."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Berry|first=Ian|title=Nicholas Krushenick: Electric Soup|publisher=DelMonico Books • Prestel|year=2016|isbn=978-3-7913-5618-1|location=New York, NY|pages=30}}</ref>

Between his primary pursuit of painting and tertiary interest in collage, Krushenick pursued a keen interest in printmaking. The companion book to ''Graphicstudio: Contemporary Art from the Collaborative Workshop at the University of South Florida'', a 1991 exhibition at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, DC, highlights Krushenick's stint with the studio in 1970 but also tells us more. "Krushenick began to experiment with screenprinting in the late 1950s and became an active printmaker by the mid-1960s," the book notes, including during a 1965 fellowship at the Tamarind Lithography Workshop in Los Angeles (which has since moved to Albuquerque, New Mexico, and been rebranded as the [[Tamarind Institute]]). At Tamarind, "he completed twenty-two lithographs during his two-month tenure," which, still featuring the more organic and undulating forms that marked Krushenick's earliest mature paintings, can be viewed [https://www.nortonsimon.org/art/browse-by-artist/artist/702/nicholas-krushenick here], as preserved in the collection of the [[Norton Simon Museum]] in Pasadena, California. In 1967, working with the famed Domberger serigraphy studio, the artist produced his ''R3-67'' portfolio, a suite of a dozen screenprints that, taking advantage of serigraphy's capacity for bright color, are significantly more vibrant and yet refined compared to the Tamarind suite and track Krushenick's broader shift toward clean, consistent line execution. The following year, published by Pace Editions, Krushenick produced his ''Iron Butterfly'' portfolio, a suite of 10 screenprints that are similarly vivid and composed. In 1970 at Graphicstudio, Krushenick briefly returned to lithography, producing works that—as three examples printed in ''Graphicstudio'' attest—indicate his embrace of straight lines and angular, "more architectonic" forms was by then complete.

In the mid-1970s, Krushenick began spiritually withdrawing from the New York art scene from which he'd already physically departed. He then embarked on his only long-term, full-time engagement as an educator, serving as a professor at the [[University of Maryland, College Park]] from 1977 to 1991. Though he never stopped producing new work, his prominence in the New York and therefore global art scene largely faded away. But his work still had its champions, including the New York-based outsider curator Mitchell Algus and his Mitchell Algus Gallery, which held two exhibitions of Krushenick's work, in 1997 and in 1999. The latter occurred after Krushenick died of liver cancer in New York on February 5, 1999, at age 69.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Smith|first1=Roberta|date=7 February 1999|title=Nicholas Krushenick, 70, Abstract and Pop Artist|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1999/02/07/nyregion/nicholas-krushenick-70-abstract-and-pop-artist.html|url-access=subscription|accessdate=18 May 2019|website=The New York Times}}</ref> As of 2021, at least ten posthumous solo exhibitions of his work have coincided with a resurgence of interest in Krushenick's work and legacy. Two of those exhibitions—at Gary Snyder Gallery in New York and the Frances Young Tang Teaching Museum and Art Gallery at Skidmore College, respectively—prompted major literary treatments: John Yau's ''Nicholas Krushenick: A Survey'' (2011) and Ian Berry's ''Nicholas Krushenick: Electric Soup'' (2016).


==Artistic Style==
==Artistic Style==


Krushenick was part of a generation emerging at a time when [[Abstract Expressionism]] had fallen out of fashion; these artists were trying to distance themselves from this style and create something new. As a result, Krushenick's work in particular straddled the lines of many styles, including: [[Op Art]], [[Pop Art]], [[Abstract Expressionism]], [[Minimalism]], and [[Color Field]]. Some of his inspirations were [[Henri Matisse]], [[J. M. W. Turner]], [[Henri Rousseau]], [[Fernand Léger]], [[Alexander Calder]], [[Roy Lichtenstein]], and [[Claes Oldenburg]]. The last two, in particular, Krushenick considered the fathers of pop.
Krushenick was part of a generation that at first emulated and soon rebelled against [[Abstract Expressionism]], the dominant painting movement in post-war America. This rebellion would eventually drive that style out of fashion, leading to numerous simultaneous movements that continue to interest artists, critics, historians and collectors today. Unlike his peers, Krushenick landed somewhere between those movements, both embracing and rejecting elements of many styles considered distinct, including [[Op Art]], [[Pop Art]], [[Minimalism]], and [[Color Field]]. Some of his earliest inspirations were [[Henri Matisse]], [[J. M. W. Turner]], [[Henri Rousseau]], and [[Fernand Léger]]. Later came [[Alexander Calder]], [[Claes Oldenburg]] and his friend [[Roy Lichtenstein]].

In 1956, when he gave his first public showing, Krushenick's paintings strongly resembled the [[Abstract Expressionist]] style. Yet he was already starting to poise discernible shapes and masses next to each other, in what one critic perhaps misinterpreted as a "Cubist persuasion."<ref name="art news 1956">{{cite journal|last1=Tyler|first1=Parker|title=Reviews and Previews: The Brothers Krushenick|journal=Art News|date=1956|volume=55|issue=3|pages=57–58}}</ref> Not a year later, on the occasion of his first solo show in 1957, another critic wisely resisted the temptation to classify the emerging artist, instead remaining content to simply observe Krushenick's "methodically painted strands or streamers which, varying from canvas to canvas in color, width and tensility, advance upon a rival host with similar properties or thrustingly explore an open space or solid color. The mutations on view are dramatically potent, flamboyantly so in the large canvases where black stalactites prong downward into yellow, or black fingers undulate from the bottom."<ref>{{Cite news|last=Young|first=Vernon|date=February 1957|title=In the Galleries: Nicholas Krushenick|work=ARTS (Incorporating Arts Digest)|url-status=live}}</ref>


In 1959, Krushenick discarded what he called the "dirty kitchen" look of oil paints and replaced it with the "delicious" electricity of Liquitex acrylics, which had just become commercially available.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Yau|first=John|title=Nicholas Krushenick: A Survey|publisher=Distributed Arts Publishers, Inc.|year=2011|isbn=978-0-9829747-3-5|location=New York, NY|pages=7}}</ref> Having an immediate effect on the brightness and saturation of his paintings as well as the precision with which he could render them, this could be considered the pivotal moment of Krushenick's career. Following this change, his paintings start to feature clear black lines framing both the painting itself and the individual forms within it, which are wobblier, curvier, messier than the more precise compositions to come. At this stage, the art world at large was still resistant to the emergence of new, less self-serious styles, which likely entailed resistance to Krushenick's work among the arts establishment. His sense of humor and overall joyfulness wasn't quite compatible with the retreating but still predominant high-minded sensibilities of the time.{{Citation needed|reason=Reliable source needed for the whole sentence|date=February 2021}}
In 1956, Nicholas Krushenick debuted alongside his brother at Camino Gallery. At this stage, Krushenick's paintings resembled the [[Abstract Expressionist]] style considerably, yet already he was starting to poise masses next to each other in something of a "Cubist persuasion."<ref name="art news 1956">{{cite journal|last1=Tyler|first1=Parker|title=Reviews and Previews: The Brothers Krushenick|journal=Art News|date=1956|volume=55|issue=3|pages=57–58}}</ref>


In 1965, one art critic, Vivien Raynor, observed that Krushenick "is now beginning to look Pop. Whether this is because he anticipated the movement and now looks more official, or because he's using acrylic colors, or simply because everyone to an extent becomes a victim of the audience's compulsion to organize artists into groups, I can't tell."<ref name="Arts magazine 1965">{{cite journal|last1=Raynor|first1=Vivien|title=In the Galleries: Nicholas Krushenick|journal=Arts Magazine|date=1965|volume=39|issue=9|page=65}}</ref> Yet it is important to note that only his palette resembled Pop art. His subject matter made no references to pop culture; indeed, it made no overt reference to any recognizable object at all. However, his increasingly monumental works did find inspiration in cartoon illustration, and many critics interpreted the subject matter as more or less covertly sexual—as vulvar and penetrative.
By 1959, he switched from oil paint to liquitex painting, which had an immediate effect on the brightness and saturation of his paintings. This could be considered his breakthrough moment. His paintings start to feature black lines, first as a framing device for both every individual form in the painting and the painting itself. At this stage, Krushenick was painting at a time when the art world was polarized without much respect for pop art; his sense of humor and overall joyfulness did not rest easy with the styles of the time.


In 1965, one art critic, Vivien Raynor, noted "...he is now beginning to look Pop. Whether this is because he anticipated the movement and now looks more official, or because he's using acrylic colors, or simply because everyone to an extent becomes a victim of the audience's compulsion to organize artists into groups I can't tell."<ref name="Arts magazine 1965">{{cite journal|last1=Raynor|first1=Vivien|title=In the Galleries: Nicholas Krushenick|journal=Arts Magazine|date=1965|volume=39|issue=9|page=65}}</ref> Yet it is important to note that only his palette resembled pop art, his subject matter made no references to Pop Culture, nor did it make any reference to any recognizable object. However, he did find inspiration in cartoon illustration and the subject matter did vaguely appear sexual: vulvar and even penetrative. By this time, he had honed in on his style, totally obscuring the visibility of the artist's hand. At first he did this with the aid of extensive drawings that became like maquettes for the painting. Over time, these drawings would become less precise and, instead, he'd rely on using tape directly on the canvas surface. This technique, in particular, was less improvisational, and thus, can be seen as a way that Krushenick further distanced himself from the Abstract Expressionist movement. By 1967, his style had become increasingly tighter, without losing its emotionality. John Perreault explained, "In spite of the hard black, coloring-book lines that divide one shape or super-color from another, the neat flatness, and the often symmetrical composition, these paintings are systematic visual manifestations of the emotionally organic, executed with cool precision, but conceived with great gusto. The raucous candy-cane stripes that Krushenick uses as the basic device of his abstractions do not 'contain' the painting."<ref name="art news 1967">{{cite journal|last1=Perreault|first1=John|title=Krushenick's Blazing Blazons|journal=Art News|date=1967|volume=66|issue=1|pages=34, 35, 72}}</ref> In 1969, Krushenick gave up his soft brush [[abstract expressionist]] technique for bolder colors and lines similar to illustration, yet maintaining use of [[abstract art|abstract]] figurative forms. This style marked him as one of the original practitioners of pop art.
By this time, Krushenick had honed in on his mature, exacting style, totally obscuring the visibility of the artist's hand. At first he did this with the aid of extensive drawings that became like maquettes for the painting. Over time, these drawings would become less precise and, instead, he'd rely on using tape directly on the canvas surface. (This technique in particular was less improvisational and thus can be seen as a way that Krushenick further distanced himself from the Abstract Expressionist movement.) By 1967, his style had become noticeably tighter, without losing its emotionality. As John Perreault observed in a feature story that year, "In spite of the hard black, coloring-book lines that divide one shape or super-color from another, the neat flatness, and the often symmetrical composition, these paintings are systematic visual manifestations of the emotionally organic, executed with cool precision, but conceived with great gusto. The raucous candy-cane stripes that Krushenick uses as the basic device of his abstractions do not 'contain' the painting."<ref name="art news 1967">{{cite journal|last1=Perreault|first1=John|title=Krushenick's Blazing Blazons|journal=Art News|date=1967|volume=66|issue=1|pages=34, 35, 72}}</ref>


In the 1970s, Krushenick began to withdraw from the New York art world. At this time, his vision began to falter and his focus turned towards education. Though he began teaching at the University of Maryland, he did continue painting. At this time, his style changed quite a bit; gone were the days of feathery, curvilinear forms. At this point, the form of the grid began to take precedent on his canvases, almost like a prescient depiction of the boom in technology that would soon arrive. Corinne Robins explains "The new paintings like the old have a tonal feeling; but now, rather than the blare of trumpets, the buzz of an IBM machine making crazy computations comes to mind."<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Roberts|first1=Corinne|title=Nicholas Krushenick: New Paintings|journal=Arts Magazine|date=1975|volume=50|issue=4|pages=86–87}}</ref> In fact, during this time he was a guest artist in 17 art departments around the country. Into the 1980s and 1990s, his paintings would become busier but his colors quieter, favoring razor blade-like shapes over feathery forms and grids.
In the mid-1970s, when Krushenick began to withdraw from the New York art world and his vision began to falter, he turned his focus towards education. But his painting continued. By this time, his style had evolved quite a bit. Gone were the feathery, curvilinear forms of the mid-1960s, which had softened and given motion to straight neighboring lines. Now the implicit and explicit form of the grid began to take precedence on his canvases, almost like a prescient depiction of the boom in technology that would soon arrive. As Corinne Robins noted in 1975, "The new paintings, like the old, have a tonal feeling; but now, rather than the blare of trumpets, the buzz of an IBM machine making crazy computations comes to mind."<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Roberts|first1=Corinne|date=1975|title=Nicholas Krushenick: New Paintings|journal=Arts Magazine|volume=50|issue=4|pages=86–87}}</ref> Into the 1980s, his paintings would retreat in precision as well as in color, marked by flurries of cartoonish, confetti-like ribbons amid cool grays, blues, pinks. By the end of that decade and the start of a new one, yellow began to dominate Krushenick's work, with renewed exactness playing out across smaller canvases. From the early 1960s to the late 1990s, perhaps the one through line is the black lines themselves, delineating Krushenick' forms but uniting his works.


==See also==
==See also==
Line 50: Line 63:
==External links==
==External links==
*[http://www.garthgreenan.com/artists/nicholas-krushenick Nicholas Krushenick at Garth Greenan Gallery]
*[http://www.garthgreenan.com/artists/nicholas-krushenick Nicholas Krushenick at Garth Greenan Gallery]
*[http://www.rogallery.com/krushenick_nicholas/krushenickhm.htm Nicholas Krushenick at Ro Gallery]
*[http://nga.gov.au/internationalprints/tyler/Default.cfm?MnuID=3&ArtistIRN=21325&List=True&CREIRN=21325&ORDER_SELECT=13&VIEW_SELECT=5&GrpNam=12&TNOTES=TRUE Nicholas Krushenick in the National Gallery of Australia's Kenneth Tyler collection]
*[http://nga.gov.au/internationalprints/tyler/Default.cfm?MnuID=3&ArtistIRN=21325&List=True&CREIRN=21325&ORDER_SELECT=13&VIEW_SELECT=5&GrpNam=12&TNOTES=TRUE Nicholas Krushenick in the National Gallery of Australia's Kenneth Tyler collection]



Revision as of 02:13, 20 February 2021

Nicholas Krushenick
Born(1929-05-31)May 31, 1929
DiedFebruary 5, 1999(1999-02-05) (aged 69)
NationalityAmerican
EducationArt Students League of New York.
Hans Hofmann School of Fine Arts
Known forPainting, Abstract art
MovementPop art, Op Art, Color Field, Minimalism, and Abstract Expressionism

Nicholas Krushenick (May 31, 1929 – February 5, 1999) was an American abstract painter whose mature artistic style straddled Op Art, Pop Art, Minimalism and Color Field. He was active in the New York art scene from the late 1950s to the late 1970s, when he largely withdrew from the city and focused his time as a professor at the University of Maryland. Initially experimenting with a more derivative Abstract Expressionist style, by the mid-1960s he had developed his own unique approach, painting increasingly decisive compositions marked by bold, colorful, geometric fields and forms distinguished and flattened by strong black lines, in a style that eventually became known as Pop abstraction. In 1984, when the biographical dictionary World Artists, 1950-1980 observed that Krushenick "has been called the only truly abstract Pop painter," his legacy had already emerged.[1] Today, as other artists have been carefully folded into the same elusive genre, he is not only considered a singular figure within that style but also its pioneer, earning him the title "the father of Pop abstraction."[2][3][4]

Biography

Born in New York City in 1929 into a working-class family, Krushenick dropped out of high school, served in World War II, worked on constructing the Major Deegan Expressway, and then enrolled in art school with the help of the GI Bill, attending the Art Students League of New York (1948–1950) and the Hans Hofmann School of Fine Art (1950–1951). In the early 1950s, Krushenick supported himself and his family by designing window displays for department stores and working for the Whitney and Metropolitan museums and the Museum of Modern Art.[5]

Then, from April 21 to May 10, 1956, Krushenick showed his work to the public for the first time. The occasion was The Brothers Krushenick: Paintings - Glassprints - Collages, a joint exhibition with his brother John Krushenick at the co-op, Camino Gallery, to which the brothers belonged. Nicholas's first solo show, titled Nicholas Krushenick: Recent Paintings, debuted at the same gallery, on January 25, 1957.

Later that year, after becoming frustrated with the internal politics of Camino, the brothers left and opened a framing shop in a nearby storefront, which quickly turned into the artists' cooperative Brata Gallery. Nicholas later recounted that it was John who devised the name, from the Russian "brata" meaning "brothers."[6] Along with Camino and others, Brata became one of the now-famed 10th Street galleries, which nurtured and galvanized experimental artists by allowing them to sidestep the conservative uptown galleries that had dominated and, from a certain point of view, stifled the New York arts scene. With members including Al Held, Ronald Bladen, Ed Clark, Yayoi Kusama, and George Sugarman, Brata was "one of the most significant of the Tenth Street cooperatives which for a time were the most important launching pads for new artists."[7] Nicholas had solo shows at Brata in 1958 and 1960.

After leaving Brata in 1962, increasingly prominent exhibitions followed, including solo shows at New York City's Graham Gallery in 1962 and 1964 and Fischbach Gallery in 1965. In 1966, he enjoyed his first solo effort in Europe, exhibiting at Galerie Müller in Stuttgart, Germany. In 1967, he gave solo shows in what were then the twin capitals of the art world, at Pace Gallery in New York City and Galerie Sonnabend in Paris, as well as in Detroit, Michigan, and Vienna, Austria, while also receiving a prestigious fine arts fellowship from the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation.[8] In 1968, the Center Opera Company of the Walker Art Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota, commissioned him to design the sets and costumes for a production of The Man in the Moon, held in conjunction with a large survey of his works at the Center. Solo exhibitionns at Harcus-Krakow Gallery in Boston, Massachusetts, and Galerie Renée Ziegler in Zurich, Switzerland, soon followed. In 1969, on the heels of another solo at Pace Gallery, Krushenick was the Fall term Artist-In-Residence at Dartmouth College's Hopkins Center for the Arts, where he mentored students and created new works, culminating in an exhibition of paintings and prints at the college's Jaffe-Friede Gallery.[9] This was not his first experience as an educator; earlier that year, he had served as a visiting critic at Yale University, and in years past, he had accepted invitations to work as a visiting artist at the School of Visual Arts in New York, the University of Wisconsin in Madison, and others.

Along the way, Krushenick's work appeared in seminal midcentury surveys at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and the Art Gallery of Toronto in 1964; at New York's Whitney Museum of American Art and Museum of Modern Art, as well as Washington DC's Corcoran Gallery of Art, in 1965; at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in 1966; and as part of the United States Pavilion at the blockbuster 1967 World's Fair, a.k.a. Expo 67, held in Montreal, Canada. By the late 1960s, Krushenick was one of New York's and indeed the world's elite painters. But even as his work was accepted and celebrated by major institutions, he viewed himself, with some satisfaction, as an outsider. As he told the curator and art historian Paul Cummings during an interview in 1968, critics and other observers have "never really pigeonholed me... Like I'm out in left field all by myself. And that's just where I want to stay."[10]

Between his primary pursuit of painting and tertiary interest in collage, Krushenick pursued a keen interest in printmaking. The companion book to Graphicstudio: Contemporary Art from the Collaborative Workshop at the University of South Florida, a 1991 exhibition at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, DC, highlights Krushenick's stint with the studio in 1970 but also tells us more. "Krushenick began to experiment with screenprinting in the late 1950s and became an active printmaker by the mid-1960s," the book notes, including during a 1965 fellowship at the Tamarind Lithography Workshop in Los Angeles (which has since moved to Albuquerque, New Mexico, and been rebranded as the Tamarind Institute). At Tamarind, "he completed twenty-two lithographs during his two-month tenure," which, still featuring the more organic and undulating forms that marked Krushenick's earliest mature paintings, can be viewed here, as preserved in the collection of the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, California. In 1967, working with the famed Domberger serigraphy studio, the artist produced his R3-67 portfolio, a suite of a dozen screenprints that, taking advantage of serigraphy's capacity for bright color, are significantly more vibrant and yet refined compared to the Tamarind suite and track Krushenick's broader shift toward clean, consistent line execution. The following year, published by Pace Editions, Krushenick produced his Iron Butterfly portfolio, a suite of 10 screenprints that are similarly vivid and composed. In 1970 at Graphicstudio, Krushenick briefly returned to lithography, producing works that—as three examples printed in Graphicstudio attest—indicate his embrace of straight lines and angular, "more architectonic" forms was by then complete.

In the mid-1970s, Krushenick began spiritually withdrawing from the New York art scene from which he'd already physically departed. He then embarked on his only long-term, full-time engagement as an educator, serving as a professor at the University of Maryland, College Park from 1977 to 1991. Though he never stopped producing new work, his prominence in the New York and therefore global art scene largely faded away. But his work still had its champions, including the New York-based outsider curator Mitchell Algus and his Mitchell Algus Gallery, which held two exhibitions of Krushenick's work, in 1997 and in 1999. The latter occurred after Krushenick died of liver cancer in New York on February 5, 1999, at age 69.[11] As of 2021, at least ten posthumous solo exhibitions of his work have coincided with a resurgence of interest in Krushenick's work and legacy. Two of those exhibitions—at Gary Snyder Gallery in New York and the Frances Young Tang Teaching Museum and Art Gallery at Skidmore College, respectively—prompted major literary treatments: John Yau's Nicholas Krushenick: A Survey (2011) and Ian Berry's Nicholas Krushenick: Electric Soup (2016).

Artistic Style

Krushenick was part of a generation that at first emulated and soon rebelled against Abstract Expressionism, the dominant painting movement in post-war America. This rebellion would eventually drive that style out of fashion, leading to numerous simultaneous movements that continue to interest artists, critics, historians and collectors today. Unlike his peers, Krushenick landed somewhere between those movements, both embracing and rejecting elements of many styles considered distinct, including Op Art, Pop Art, Minimalism, and Color Field. Some of his earliest inspirations were Henri Matisse, J. M. W. Turner, Henri Rousseau, and Fernand Léger. Later came Alexander Calder, Claes Oldenburg and his friend Roy Lichtenstein.

In 1956, when he gave his first public showing, Krushenick's paintings strongly resembled the Abstract Expressionist style. Yet he was already starting to poise discernible shapes and masses next to each other, in what one critic perhaps misinterpreted as a "Cubist persuasion."[12] Not a year later, on the occasion of his first solo show in 1957, another critic wisely resisted the temptation to classify the emerging artist, instead remaining content to simply observe Krushenick's "methodically painted strands or streamers which, varying from canvas to canvas in color, width and tensility, advance upon a rival host with similar properties or thrustingly explore an open space or solid color. The mutations on view are dramatically potent, flamboyantly so in the large canvases where black stalactites prong downward into yellow, or black fingers undulate from the bottom."[13]

In 1959, Krushenick discarded what he called the "dirty kitchen" look of oil paints and replaced it with the "delicious" electricity of Liquitex acrylics, which had just become commercially available.[14] Having an immediate effect on the brightness and saturation of his paintings as well as the precision with which he could render them, this could be considered the pivotal moment of Krushenick's career. Following this change, his paintings start to feature clear black lines framing both the painting itself and the individual forms within it, which are wobblier, curvier, messier than the more precise compositions to come. At this stage, the art world at large was still resistant to the emergence of new, less self-serious styles, which likely entailed resistance to Krushenick's work among the arts establishment. His sense of humor and overall joyfulness wasn't quite compatible with the retreating but still predominant high-minded sensibilities of the time.[citation needed]

In 1965, one art critic, Vivien Raynor, observed that Krushenick "is now beginning to look Pop. Whether this is because he anticipated the movement and now looks more official, or because he's using acrylic colors, or simply because everyone to an extent becomes a victim of the audience's compulsion to organize artists into groups, I can't tell."[15] Yet it is important to note that only his palette resembled Pop art. His subject matter made no references to pop culture; indeed, it made no overt reference to any recognizable object at all. However, his increasingly monumental works did find inspiration in cartoon illustration, and many critics interpreted the subject matter as more or less covertly sexual—as vulvar and penetrative.

By this time, Krushenick had honed in on his mature, exacting style, totally obscuring the visibility of the artist's hand. At first he did this with the aid of extensive drawings that became like maquettes for the painting. Over time, these drawings would become less precise and, instead, he'd rely on using tape directly on the canvas surface. (This technique in particular was less improvisational and thus can be seen as a way that Krushenick further distanced himself from the Abstract Expressionist movement.) By 1967, his style had become noticeably tighter, without losing its emotionality. As John Perreault observed in a feature story that year, "In spite of the hard black, coloring-book lines that divide one shape or super-color from another, the neat flatness, and the often symmetrical composition, these paintings are systematic visual manifestations of the emotionally organic, executed with cool precision, but conceived with great gusto. The raucous candy-cane stripes that Krushenick uses as the basic device of his abstractions do not 'contain' the painting."[16]

In the mid-1970s, when Krushenick began to withdraw from the New York art world and his vision began to falter, he turned his focus towards education. But his painting continued. By this time, his style had evolved quite a bit. Gone were the feathery, curvilinear forms of the mid-1960s, which had softened and given motion to straight neighboring lines. Now the implicit and explicit form of the grid began to take precedence on his canvases, almost like a prescient depiction of the boom in technology that would soon arrive. As Corinne Robins noted in 1975, "The new paintings, like the old, have a tonal feeling; but now, rather than the blare of trumpets, the buzz of an IBM machine making crazy computations comes to mind."[17] Into the 1980s, his paintings would retreat in precision as well as in color, marked by flurries of cartoonish, confetti-like ribbons amid cool grays, blues, pinks. By the end of that decade and the start of a new one, yellow began to dominate Krushenick's work, with renewed exactness playing out across smaller canvases. From the early 1960s to the late 1990s, perhaps the one through line is the black lines themselves, delineating Krushenick' forms but uniting his works.

See also

References

  1. ^ Marks, Claude (1984). World Artists, 1950-1980. New York, NY: H.W. Wilson Company. p. 457. ISBN 0-8242-0707-6.
  2. ^ Westfall, Stephen; Westfall, Stephen (2015-02-01). "Inventing Pop Abstraction". ARTnews.com. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  3. ^ Westfall, Stephen; Westfall, Stephen (2012-01-06). "Nicholas Krushenick". ARTnews.com. Retrieved 2021-02-12.
  4. ^ Berry, Ian (2016). Nicholas Krushenick: Electric Soup. New York, NY: DelMonico Books • Prestel. p. 9. ISBN 978-3-7913-5618-1.
  5. ^ Marks, C. (1984). World Artists 1950 - 1980. University of Michigan. ISBN 9780824207076
  6. ^ Yau, John (2012). Nicholas Krushenick: A Survey. New York, NY: Distributed Art Publishers, Inc. p. 116. ISBN 978-0-9829747-3-5.
  7. ^ Berry, Ian (2016). Nicholas Krushenick: Electric Soup. New York, NY: DelMonico Books • Prestel. p. 26. ISBN 978-3-7913-5618-1.
  8. ^ "Fellows: Nicholas Krushenick".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  9. ^ Wysocki, Matthew (1969). "Nicholas Krushenick: Fall term Artist-In-Residence." Exhibition booklet, Jaffe-Fried Gallery, Dartmouth College. Published by Nimrod Press in Boston, MA.
  10. ^ Berry, Ian (2016). Nicholas Krushenick: Electric Soup. New York, NY: DelMonico Books • Prestel. p. 30. ISBN 978-3-7913-5618-1. {{cite book}}: no-break space character in |publisher= at position 18 (help)
  11. ^ Smith, Roberta (7 February 1999). "Nicholas Krushenick, 70, Abstract and Pop Artist". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 May 2019.
  12. ^ Tyler, Parker (1956). "Reviews and Previews: The Brothers Krushenick". Art News. 55 (3): 57–58.
  13. ^ Young, Vernon (February 1957). "In the Galleries: Nicholas Krushenick". ARTS (Incorporating Arts Digest).{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  14. ^ Yau, John (2011). Nicholas Krushenick: A Survey. New York, NY: Distributed Arts Publishers, Inc. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-9829747-3-5.
  15. ^ Raynor, Vivien (1965). "In the Galleries: Nicholas Krushenick". Arts Magazine. 39 (9): 65.
  16. ^ Perreault, John (1967). "Krushenick's Blazing Blazons". Art News. 66 (1): 34, 35, 72.
  17. ^ Roberts, Corinne (1975). "Nicholas Krushenick: New Paintings". Arts Magazine. 50 (4): 86–87.