User talk:Sreein Sreedhar

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Sreein Sreedhar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sreein Sreedhar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Let There Be Sunshine 07:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of tallest building in Pune

Hello, Sreein Sreedhar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of tallest building in Pune".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Left Democratic Front (Kerala), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Left Democratic Front (Kerala) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Firefly. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nava Kerala Mission have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. firefly ( t · c ) 12:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communist Party of India (Marxist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left Democratic Front. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Sreein Sreedhar! Your additions to Pimpri-Chinchwad have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 11:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pimpri-Chinchwad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kawasaki.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Your edit to Pimpri-Chinchwad has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pimpri Chinchwad Science Park

Hello Sreein Sreedhar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pimpri Chinchwad Science Park for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Yeeno (talk) 🍁 07:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E. K. Nayanar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manorama.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cochin International Airport

added a link pointing to Manorama

Mumbai

added a link pointing to City of Dreams

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing Malayalam films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fazil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

India–Pakistan sports rivalries

added a link pointing to Kabaddi World Cup

List of highest-grossing Malayalam films

added a link pointing to Aadu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Chennai Super Kings–Mumbai Indians rivalry. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:03, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chennai Super Kings–Royal Challengers Bangalore rivalry (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Most Comfortable Chair was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chennai Super Kings–Royal Challengers Bangalore rivalry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— The Most Comfortable Chair 11:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited India–Pakistan sports rivalries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabaddi World Cup.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing Malayalam films. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Tusk001 (talk) 04:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pepper and Daimler.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Pune Airport, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chakan and Purandar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Minor edits

I do not know how it happened, but you recently marked this edit to the article on Pimpri-Chinchwad as minor. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Your edit added two sentences:

"It is the fifth largest city in Maharashtra and the nineteenth largest city by population in India. The city is located 135 km (84 mi) southeast from the state's capital Mumbai."

It was clearly not a minor edit. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Sreein Sreedhar! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Pune that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mumbai into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.