User talk:JC Kotisow: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:30, 7 December 2023

Welcome!

Hello, JC Kotisow, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Giant Snowman 09:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Giant Snowman 09:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Ymer Abili article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 09:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Sydney United 58 FC season (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

NPL teams, like Sydney United, aren't notable enough to have their own articles for seasons.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Sydney United 58 FC season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but Football NSW provides articles for these clubs even on matchdays, I dont know what kind of references you want in these articles but the ones I've put in should be enough info for it to be published JC Kotisow (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JC Kotisow! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then please explain to me, what I could do to get this published. JC Kotisow (talk) 05:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jackson Khoury (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jackson Khoury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jackson Khoury (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jackson Khoury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason there was no improvement is because he is an obscure footballer playing in NPL, maybe I clicked the wrong option on picking biography but he is playing for a notable club and there is a lot of info on him through gameday and transfermarkt found in the external links section. JC Kotisow (talk) 00:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leroy Jennings has been accepted

Leroy Jennings, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Bailey Rule

Hello, JC Kotisow, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Eagleash, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Bailey Rule, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bailey Rule.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Eagleash}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Eagleash (talk) 22:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bailey Rule for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bailey Rule, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bailey Rule until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 APIA Leichhardt FC season (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 APIA Leichhardt FC season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:46, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jackson Khoury for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson Khoury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Khoury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2023 APIA Leichhardt FC season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 APIA Leichhardt FC season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 APIA Leichhardt FC season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cristian Gonzalez (soccer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cristian Gonzalez (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristian Gonzalez (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Wollongong Wolves FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcus Younis (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Submission is highly promotional, claiming for example that the subject is "known for his dribbling and creativity" when the sources make no such claims.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcus Younis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcus Younis (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage (nto a mention in passing) of the subject, excluding database sources. Noting the Western Sydney Wanderers webiste is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcus Younis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:APIA-Leichhardt-beat-Western-Sydney-Wanderers-in-FFA-Cup.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:APIA-Leichhardt-beat-Western-Sydney-Wanderers-in-FFA-Cup.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Jason-Romero.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Jason-Romero.jpeg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 12:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aidan Simmons has been accepted

Aidan Simmons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 20:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Fram (talk) 12:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Tomelic (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Tomelic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cristian Gonzalez (footballer, born December 1996) (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cristian Gonzalez (footballer, born December 1996) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:20, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Franco Maya

Hello, JC Kotisow,

Thank you for creating Franco Maya.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

See WP:SPORTCRIT and [[[:WP:GNG]]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Eagleash}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Eagleash (talk) 10:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Younis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Marcus Younis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Franco Maya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Franco Maya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Bonetig (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alex Bonetig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Franco Maya (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Franco Maya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:54, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Football NSW season (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was:

Again, still too soon.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Football NSW season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus (talk) 07:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rijad Smajić

The article Rijad Smajić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tiago Quintal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiago Quintal, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiago Quintal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marcus Younis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcus Younis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Younis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Jackson Khoury. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Alex Bonetig

Hello, JC Kotisow,

Thank you for creating Alex Bonetig.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

See WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Eagleash}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Eagleash (talk) 05:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sasha Kuzevski (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majash2020 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sasha Kuzevski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Majash2020 (talk) 09:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Bonetig moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alex Bonetig, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look at other players in the a league squad who are nearly the same age as Bonetig and tell me if those matches with GNG. Alessandro Lopanebarely has any link or references yet he passes GNG. Ali Auglah is literally one link, why does this article need to be put into draft space if other articles that have been made barely show any sources. JC Kotisow (talk) 12:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Florent Indalecio article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 18:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Florent Indalecio, you may be blocked from editing. Giant Snowman 12:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel Di Pizio moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Miguel Di Pizio, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ethan Cox (soccer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ethan Cox (soccer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Caspers moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Edward Caspers, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Edward Caspers has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Edward Caspers. Thanks! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ethan Cox (soccer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ethan Cox (soccer). Thanks! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Miguel Di Pizio has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Miguel Di Pizio. Thanks! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Edward Caspers has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Edward Caspers. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Caspers (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The GameDay stats link added does nothing to address the WP:SPORTBASIC failure. This guideline clearly states that Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward Caspers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

James Nikolovski moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, James Nikolovski, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you doing the same for other stub articles or just mine JC Kotisow (talk) 12:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Nikolovski (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oltrepier was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I think we should wait at least until the player starts featuring for the first team... Also, try to insert more secondary sources, if you can.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Nikolovski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 14:47, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcus Lal (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still lacks significant coverage from independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcus Lal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lachlan Lal (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lachlan Lal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miguel Di Pizio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miguel Di Pizio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Di Pizio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Obiora Eze (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NSOCCER, has yet to play a fully professional game.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Obiora Eze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cantabria Football Federation moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cantabria Football Federation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel Di Pizio (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See source analysis at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Di Pizio. Di Pizio is not notable currently but may be notable later in life.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel Di Pizio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Federico Oliva Firpo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Federico Oliva Firpo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Miloš Ninković

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Miloš Ninković, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:59, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Pavlesic moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anthony Pavlesic, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel Di Pizio (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BeanieFan11 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The last AFD just closed less than two weeks ago with a consensus to draftify. Wait some time before re-submitting. The KeepUp piece looks somewhat decent, but besides that I don't see enough for GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel Di Pizio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

alright I will wait until there are new sources then. Cheers JC Kotisow (talk) 21:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2018 APIA Leichhardt Tigers FC season

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2018 APIA Leichhardt Tigers FC season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2023 APIA Leichhardt FC season

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 APIA Leichhardt FC season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Zdrilic (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Youth athlete who hasn't made a first team appearance yet, won't be notable until then.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Zdrilic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 17:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

POV

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Brian Kaltak. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Giant Snowman 18:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well can you check Joe Gauci article, because I expanded it and want to see your view on it JC Kotisow (talk) 23:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2018 APIA Leichhardt Tigers FC season

Hello, JC Kotisow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2018 APIA Leichhardt Tigers FC season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nestory Irankunda

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nestory Irankunda you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JRevewier -- JRevewier (talk) 14:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcus Lal (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 2.26.108.203 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It's borderline - I would accept if it hadn't already been deleted at AfD, but because it's been deleted before, I'd like to see at least one additional GNG source to make sure it won't get deleted again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcus Lal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

2.26.108.203 (talk) 10:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Question

Hi JC_Kotisow. Straight up, did you create the user account JRevewier just to approve your two WP:GANs? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes, but i didn't make any of my nominations GA. I reviewed two articles with that account and one of which I didn't nominate. JC Kotisow (talk) 22:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, JC Kotisow, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as JRevewier (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a reminder, creating multiple accounts is generally not permissible. You're forthright honesty is likely what saved you from having some sort of sanction on your main account, but that will probably not be extended to you again. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:51, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

alright wont do it again then JC Kotisow (talk) 06:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of NPL NSW Men hat-tricks

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of NPL NSW Men hat-tricks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lachlan Lal (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JML1148 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All but one of the sources in the article are either statistics (Soccerway, GameDay), passing mentions (Oceania Football), too short (FijiLive) or related to the subject (Manly United, Football NSW), thus all failing WP:SIGCOV. We need "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lachlan Lal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 05:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Angel Gomes GA review

Hi! I'll soon be unable to make some edits on Wikipedia for a few weeks so it would be great if we could finish the review as long as you have enough time for the remaining sections. It's been more than three weeks since you started the review now, so let's wrap it up seeing as we have come close to the goal. Thank you and kind regards, AideDésintéressée (talk) 04:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anthony Tomelic

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anthony Tomelic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cristian Gonzalez (footballer, born December 1996)

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cristian Gonzalez (footballer, born December 1996), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel Di Pizio (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I very nearly accepted until realising Keepup wasn't independent. Anything else talking about him?!? This is really close.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel Di Pizio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 19:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcus Younis (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't believe Keepup is a secondary enough source here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcus Younis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 19:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2023 Rockdale Ilinden FC season

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 Rockdale Ilinden FC season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nestory Irankunda

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nestory Irankunda you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Oltrepier -- Oltrepier (talk) 09:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Aaron Mooy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aaron Mooy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Aaron Mooy

The article Aaron Mooy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aaron Mooy and Talk:Aaron Mooy/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Franco Maya

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Franco Maya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nestory Irankunda

The article Nestory Irankunda you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Nestory Irankunda for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Oltrepier -- Oltrepier (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UD Las Palmas

When creating articles please don't copy and paste from previous season articles without attribution. Dl.thinker (talk) 23:50, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dl.thinker What do you mean. I haven't done anything like that JC Kotisow (talk) 01:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant in several sections of the article there is the same information found in many articles created. We were going to merge the two articles, but nothing happened. Dl.thinker (talk) 02:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the problem. I don't copy and paste information, I write all my research by typing only. If there are articles that do have the same information, just know that I have nothing to do with it. JC Kotisow (talk) 07:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, what specifically about the article are you referring to? JC Kotisow (talk) 07:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nestory Irankunda

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nestory Irankunda you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Idiosincrático -- Idiosincrático (talk) 01:00, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cristian Gonzalez (footballer, born December 1996)

Hello, JC Kotisow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cristian Gonzalez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nestory Irankunda

The article Nestory Irankunda you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nestory Irankunda for comments about the article, and Talk:Nestory Irankunda/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Idiosincrático -- Idiosincrático (talk) 07:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ethan Cox (soccer)

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ethan Cox (soccer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Monetary policy of Australia. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Franco Maya

Hello, JC Kotisow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Franco Maya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JC Kotisow. Thank you for your work on Yianni Nicolaou. User:Ibjaja055, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ibjaja055}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ibjaja055 (talk) 10:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Héctor Fort

Hello, JC Kotisow

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Stifle, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Héctor Fort, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Stifle}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Stifle (talk) 08:32, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tiago Quintal

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tiago Quintal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soccer in Australia

Please familiarise yourself with WP:MOSFIA. This guideline is about sports known as "football" and the terms that should be used in articles related to Australia. For association football, "soccer" is the term we use. QLDer in NSW (talk) 20:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arion Sulemani (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Except the season review, the rest of the cited sources are just entries on databases or routine announcements of player participation. Needs more SIGCOV from reliable and independent sources to show the subject's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arion Sulemani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 14:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marcus Younis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcus Younis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Younis (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ethan Cox (soccer)

Hello, JC Kotisow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ethan Cox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Obiora Eze

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Obiora Eze, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Noa Skoko

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noa Skoko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cantabria Football Federation

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cantabria Football Federation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:James Nikolovski

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:James Nikolovski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Miguel Di Pizio has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Miguel Di Pizio. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 11:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Greenman How do I establish notability? I have 17 links and nearly 3 just mainly about him, is that not notable enough? JC Kotisow (talk) 21:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Aaron Mooy

The article Aaron Mooy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Aaron Mooy for comments about the article, and Talk:Aaron Mooy/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 08:23, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel Di Pizio (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GMH Melbourne was:

Fails WP:NSOCCER guidelines. Also, there have been zero improvements since the last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel Di Pizio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcus Younis (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Virtually identical to the version just deleted at AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Younis (2nd nomination)), but as the author of both, I believe you already know that. This article has already been created by you twice and deleted at AfD twice. Please improve it further before resubmitting again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcus Younis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiago Quintal (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tiago Quintal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Youth career section

Hi there, since we disagreed on the location of where youth career should go, I posed the question to the wikiFootball talk page to see what the wider community thinks. I posed it as a general question (didn't mention the Luis L-L page). I don't mean it with any ill-intent, I just want to make sure my future editing is consistent with what the community does, so I can be consistent in future and want to put it in the right spot, since I've always put it in Early life. Just wanted to give you a heads up, so you can add your thoughts, since you would prefer it in the club section. Here's the link Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Should_Youth_Career_go_in_"Early_life"_section_or_"Club_career"_section. Cheers, RedPatch (talk) 02:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RedPatch All good if you meant no ill intent, I was just trying to add something about the footballer's actual life because it felt unusual how his early life was just about his career in youth football. Usually from looking at other articles, the youth career is in the club career, there are many many articles that demonstrate this but also others that have a bit of their youth career in their early life. Anyway let me know what they say. Cheers, JC Kotisow (talk) 07:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So just to provide the update, after the discussion was open for about a week, the discussion was a bit split, but the general view was to put it in the early life, but possibly include it in the club career if it was with the club that led to their senior debut. Nothing really clear-cut either way RedPatch (talk) 00:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RedPatch Just depends on context really. Really brief statements about a footballer's junior clubs should be put in early life. However if it is broad should be put in club career at least that is how I would put it. Cheers, JC Kotisow (talk) 01:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jackson Khoury (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources you've currently got don't really do enough to establish Khoury's notability - they're either not independent (as in, they're from his club or another group associated with him), or they're discussing him as part of an article on the team or in the context of a database. Articles on Khoury have also been deleted three separate times, and I can't see anything substantially different from those times in terms of the notability since this point.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jackson Khoury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 22:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcus Younis (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Turnagra were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources really establish notability - they're all either referring to Younis in the context of his team or as a database entry, neither of which determine that he is notable in his own accord.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcus Younis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 02:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcus Younis (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcus Younis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 02:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nestory Irankunda

Hello, please do not remove sourced information. Thanks. Simione001 (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Simione001 You call that source information. You need to find more than just one to state that he was bought for just 780,000 euros. Please, please, find more information. JC Kotisow (talk) 00:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Simione001 Actually never mind, I saw the other you put. JC Kotisow (talk) 00:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The way its written currently sounds like they paid 3M pounds up front however there is a counter report in germany that it was only 750000 euro. Simione001 (talk) 02:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Simione001 Yes but it is still undisclosed, it is not known how much they put up front so I think just saying 3M pounds, included with add-ons is fine. Honestly, it's not a big deal but if we want to be specific than just write that "it was also reported by other outlets to be a base offer of 1 million/750,000 (euros/pounds/AUD etc.) with a potential payment of 3 million/5 million (again depending on the currency)." Let me know your thoughts though. Cheers, JC Kotisow (talk) 02:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, so both figures should be put forward.Simione001 (talk) 03:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Simione001 Yep, I already put it in. JC Kotisow (talk) 03:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cantabria Football Federation

Hello, JC Kotisow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cantabria Football Federation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dean Pelekanos has been accepted

Dean Pelekanos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 13:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhys Youlley (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are mostly primary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rhys Youlley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Antonis has been accepted

George Antonis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 10:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nicholas Zdrilic

Hello, JC Kotisow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nicholas Zdrilic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel Di Pizio (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GMH Melbourne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL (basic criteria) and improve the article accordingly with sourcing. If you have any questions feel free to leave a message at my talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel Di Pizio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 13:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Xfiles82 (talk) 08:05, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Xfiles82 He made his A-league debut against Newcastle Jets and the fact that your three links don't even provide any information in terms of his debut. Please please kindly do your research. Cheers, JC Kotisow (talk) 09:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I realised later that was his second appearance, my bad there an amended now, but none-the-less and actually see that third-party link from FoxSports, which show he was subbed on and when, during the Victory match. I'll add the Foxsports link for that Jets game April of last season, for a third-party reference for that game aswell (Done). The ESPN link I found before also confirmed the Victory appearance. So he's featured twice in the A-League now and still no article, but I understand if the page has issues with referencing elsewhere, that we're still collectively to address. Xfiles82 (talk) 16:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Xfiles82 Don't add a third party link. Just use soccerway, it is much better than ESPN and Fox sport 2405:6E00:4F4:5F8D:95D0:558E:C98:D6C6 (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm slightly confused, aren't Media sources the better option, as they aren't connected, conflicted of interest, with organisations who are involved in producing that content covered, like in this case, the sporting organisation and it's associated clubs and self-promoting media? Others here don't seem happy with football stats sites too, as they don't seem to supply enough data to clarify the details? Hopefully as you say, Soccerway is okay though. BTW Sorry for constantly amending my edits. I hope some people can finally get this article up to sufficient standard though, as this Di Pizio kid has appeared via three substitutions in the league (Newcastle Jets April last season at the 85th min, against Macarthur this season (29th Oct) as a sub 75th min and at the 70th Min against the Victory (3rd Dec) ^[1]. He seems on-trend to feature alot more with the Mariners - I guess I just need to be patient, like, he scored for the Central Coast Mariners in the AFC Cup recently and I'm sure in no-time he'll score for the CCM in the A-League too, especially as he's already had a number of shots on goal blocked or saved already in his brief appearances. Though finally, it's a shame due to sourcing standards thus far, this kid doesn't have a page, where *cough* others who have yet to have an A-League appearance, seem to have Wiki pages who are in the squads for Sydney FC and the West Sydney Wanderers - I guess their editors just do a better job Xfiles82 (talk) 14:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Xfiles82 You're right and I apologize for my error, he did make three A-League appearances, maybe I need to pay better attention. Yeah it is a shame he isn't talked about more but then again, it is what it is. Anyway you have a good day, cheers, JC Kotisow (talk) 20:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problems JC - BTW Why did you re-instate the links from A-League clubs and the Federation (Football Australia, Socceroos etc) when as GBH Melbourne stated: "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia." - This is why I tried so hard to find news organisations who covered those National team appearances and tournaments, it took alot of effort. As others mentioned here, his wiki page is still too reliant on Australian FA and related links (FootballAustralia.com.au, Socceroos.com.au, KeepUp.com.au, various A-League club pages, e.g. like www.WesternSydneyWanderers.com.au, www.CentralCoastMariners.com.au etc...). So that's why I dug up and found Shepparton News and even Chinese Media outlets for links, and also 10Play (Channel 10) and others, to try to 'improve' the sourcing standards of those links - why revert them? Xfiles82 (talk) 10:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

^ https://www.espn.co.uk/football/player/_/id/350388/miguel-di-pizio

[1] ttps://www.espn.co.uk/football/player/_/id/350388/miguel-di-pizio

[1]

@@ Line 1,138: / Line 1,138: @@
 ::::I'm slightly confused, aren't Media sources the better option, as they aren't connected, conflicted of interest, with organisations who are involved in producing that content covered, like in this case, the sporting organisation and it's associated clubs and self-promoting media? Others here don't seem happy with football stats sites too, as they don't seem to supply enough data to clarify the details? Hopefully as you say, Soccerway is okay though. BTW Sorry for constantly amending my edits. I hope some people can finally get this article up to sufficient standard though, as this Di Pizio kid has appeared via three substitutions in the league (Newcastle Jets April last season at the 85th min, against Macarthur this season (29th Oct) as a sub 75th min and at the 70th Min against the Victory (3rd Dec) <ref>https://www.espn.co.uk/football/player/_/id/350388/miguel-di-pizio</ref>. He seems on-trend to feature alot more with the Mariners - I guess I just need to be patient, like, he scored for the Central Coast Mariners in the AFC Cup recently and I'm sure in no-time he'll score for the CCM in the A-League too, especially as he's already had a number of shots on goal blocked or saved already in his brief appearances. Though finally, it's a shame due to sourcing standards thus far, this kid doesn't have a page, where *cough* others who have yet to have an A-League appearance, seem to have Wiki pages who are in the squads for Sydney FC and the West Sydney Wanderers - I guess their editors just do a better job [[User:Xfiles82|Xfiles82]] ([[User talk:Xfiles82|talk]]) 14:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 :::::@[[User:Xfiles82|Xfiles82]] You're right and I apologize for my error, he did make three A-League appearances, maybe I need to pay better attention. Yeah it is a shame he isn't talked about more but then again, it is what it is. Anyway you have a good day, cheers, [[User:JC Kotisow|JC Kotisow]] ([[User talk:JC Kotisow#top|talk]]) 20:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
+::::::No problems JC - BTW Why did you re-instate the links from A-League clubs and the Federation (Football Australia, Socceroos etc) when as GBH Melbourne stated: "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia." - This is why I tried so hard to find news organisations who covered those National team appearances and tournaments, it took alot of effort. As others mentioned here, his wiki page is still too reliant on Australian FA and related links (FootballAustralia.com.au, Socceroos.com.au, KeepUp.com.au, various A-League club pages, e.g. like www.WesternSydneyWanderers.com.au, www.CentralCoastMariners.com.au etc...). So that's why I dug up and found Shepparton News and even Chinese Media outlets for links, and also 10Play (Channel 10) and others, to try to 'improve' the sourcing standards of those links - why revert them? [[User:Xfiles82|Xfiles82]] ([[User talk:Xfiles82|talk]]) 10:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 == Your submission at [[WP:AfC|Articles for creation]] ==