Jump to content

User talk:SLBedit: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Navboxes and tones: new section
Tags: Reverted New topic
Line 60: Line 60:
:No need for that section. The article is about the football team. [[User:SLBedit|SLBedit]] ([[User talk:SLBedit#top|talk]]) 00:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
:No need for that section. The article is about the football team. [[User:SLBedit|SLBedit]] ([[User talk:SLBedit#top|talk]]) 00:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
:That information won't improve the article. And please don't promote certain players per WP:RECENTISM. [[User:SLBedit|SLBedit]] ([[User talk:SLBedit#top|talk]]) 00:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
:That information won't improve the article. And please don't promote certain players per WP:RECENTISM. [[User:SLBedit|SLBedit]] ([[User talk:SLBedit#top|talk]]) 00:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

== Navboxes and tones ==

About the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latin_Cup&oldid=prev&diff=1214768271 reversion] you did on Latin Cup (and focusing on the tone you used at the edit summary) let me clear some issues: 1) navboxes are also templates; 2) thanks for your ''advise'' but I DO know that navboxes are not visible on mobile phones, although they exist anyway. My edit was based on [[Wikipedia:Navigation template|WP:Navbox]] which states "if the most immediately related links are kept under "See also", the reader has a better idea of scope". 3) finally, you also "should know" that it's recommendable for wikipedians to create an user page. Next time please, watch your tone at the summaries. [[User:Fma12|Fma12]] ([[User talk:Fma12|talk]]) 14:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:32, 21 March 2024

SLBedit, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi SLBedit! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, SLBedit. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! smileguy91talk 03:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Thank you for correcting me. — Ekin(talk·@) 14:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, SLBedit!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Moops T 22:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

S.L. Benfica to Good Article

Hey! I was looking at the article and I think we can nominate it to Good Article. What do you think? BigLordFlashtalk 19:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BigLordFlash: sure, but I don't think it will pass. SLBedit (talk) 19:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SLBedit: I think it will pass because the article is of higher quality than most good articles about football teams. BigLordFlashtalk 20:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately I can't nominate it because I didnt contribute for the article as much as you. So I would like to ask you to nominate the article and then I can help you answering all the questions from the reviewer. BigLordFlashtalk 20:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I shouldn't the one nominating it because I'm a major contributor to the article. There are other users that have contributed. SLBedit (talk) 20:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But that's the reason it should be you! But I understand you don't want that responsability and I respect that. I'll contribute to the article and then I'll nominate it by myself. BigLordFlashtalk 20:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other departments

Hey! Can you help me to create the Other departments section? I've already add some stuff there and I really need your help since it's the last topic we need to add for the GA nomination. BigLordFlashtalk 16:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need for that section. The article is about the football team. SLBedit (talk) 00:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That information won't improve the article. And please don't promote certain players per WP:RECENTISM. SLBedit (talk) 00:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the reversion you did on Latin Cup (and focusing on the tone you used at the edit summary) let me clear some issues: 1) navboxes are also templates; 2) thanks for your advise but I DO know that navboxes are not visible on mobile phones, although they exist anyway. My edit was based on WP:Navbox which states "if the most immediately related links are kept under "See also", the reader has a better idea of scope". 3) finally, you also "should know" that it's recommendable for wikipedians to create an user page. Next time please, watch your tone at the summaries. Fma12 (talk) 14:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]