User talk:Benfskye1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:42, 31 July 2024

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Benfskye1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologise for my outburst this afternoon which caused me to edit inappropriately and against the rules which I fully understand why I have been blocked. I have Autism and was having a momentary meltdown which caused the whole situation. I have previously had good standing and have edited correctly with useful information and updates and would request that, having had time to think about my actions and reflect, I would request that it be reviewed Benfskye1 (talk) 13:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I apologise for my outburst this afternoon which caused me to edit inappropriately and against the rules which I fully understand why I have been blocked.  I have Autism and was having a momentary meltdown which caused the whole situation.  I have previously had good standing and have edited correctly with useful information and updates and would request that, having had time to think about my actions and reflect, I would request that it be reviewed [[User:Benfskye1|Benfskye1]] ([[User talk:Benfskye1#top|talk]]) 13:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologise for my outburst this afternoon which caused me to edit inappropriately and against the rules which I fully understand why I have been blocked.  I have Autism and was having a momentary meltdown which caused the whole situation.  I have previously had good standing and have edited correctly with useful information and updates and would request that, having had time to think about my actions and reflect, I would request that it be reviewed [[User:Benfskye1|Benfskye1]] ([[User talk:Benfskye1#top|talk]]) 13:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologise for my outburst this afternoon which caused me to edit inappropriately and against the rules which I fully understand why I have been blocked.  I have Autism and was having a momentary meltdown which caused the whole situation.  I have previously had good standing and have edited correctly with useful information and updates and would request that, having had time to think about my actions and reflect, I would request that it be reviewed [[User:Benfskye1|Benfskye1]] ([[User talk:Benfskye1#top|talk]]) 13:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Benfskye1! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! NemesisAT (talk) 22:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Benfskye1 (talk) 22:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Freddie and the Dreamers

Hi, I'd been meaning to add to the Freddie and the Dreamers "You Were Made for Me" article that you created before it was moved to draft. Do you mind if I edit the draft and re-submit it? DPUH (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Go ahead. Sorry for the few days-late reply. Benfskye1 (talk) 14:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks DPUH (talk) 11:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Masked Dancer (British series 2). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 07:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do apologise. The section for Episode 6 is still missing, and details for that must be added at some point. You see, I didn’t even watch the show so I’ve no idea what dance styles the contestants did, etc. Benfskye1 (talk) 07:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use of reference templates

Hi @Benfskye1,

Thank you for your edits to British Rail Class 66. I did notice however that the reference provided was inserted as a bare URL - such references are subject to link rot, and because of this templates, such as Cite Web exist. Please try and make use of these templates when adding references to articles.

Once again, thank you for your contibutions. Danners430 (talk) 09:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas with Cliff moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Christmas with Cliff, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

While this is most likely to be notable, more work must be done on the article before it is published in the mainspace. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:32, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t really know how to manage drafted articles but I just wanted to create the article as nobody else did.

I’m sure everything will be sorted soon such as citations and more info on the article’s subject. Benfskye1 (talk) 17:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Queen's Guide

According to The Queen’s Guide award is the highest award you can work towards in guiding the Queen's Guide does not seem to have change the name to King's Guide. Do you have a source that shows they have changed? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:49, 17 December 2022 (UTC)][reply]

No. I do not have a source at all. I changed the title of the article to make up to date as Charles is the King. Benfskye1 (talk) 20:02, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Devine

If you have contributions to make then that's super; please engage at the Talk page instead of hurling abuse, however. And assume good faith. I have improved the article considerably and explained my changes at the Talk page. You are free to revert, but please do so in a way which accords with Wikipedia policies and actually improves the article. Please do not make absurd claims or they will naturally have to be reverted or improved in short order. Please behave with respect to other editors. All the best, Emmentalist (talk) 20:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have again removed a sourced detail from the Sydney Devine article. The source is the London Times newspaper and is manifestly sound. See WP:reliablesources. Please discuss at the Talk page before making alterations in this way, and indeed before making wild allegations which neither make sense nor assume good faith. All the best.Emmentalist (talk) 14:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, I have not removed any sources. I noticed you once again added very stupid and very nonsensical details about the fact that Sydney Devine encountered the ghost of Elvis. He may have performed in front of him which is true, but not the ghost encounter. Please refrain from adding these details then I won’t have to remove such edits every so often. Benfskye1 (talk) 14:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop being abusive. I will say this only one more time. The claim that Sydney Devine appeared in front of Elvis can only be given the same status as his claim that he met Elvis' ghost. They are both reportable, and reported, as simply his own claims: They are in the same acceptable source. If one is included then the other should be. They are both true insofar as they are reports, in the same source, as claims of Sydney Devine. All the best, Emmentalist (talk) 21:59, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh very well. I was honestly not being abusive and I might as well leave it as that. Benfskye1 (talk) 22:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Christmas with Cliff

Hello, Benfskye1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Christmas with Cliff, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Christmas with Cliff

Hello, Benfskye1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Christmas with Cliff".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since six months ago, an article called Christmas with Cliff had already been created. Benfskye1 (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wilko

Wilko is still trading, it hasn't been disestablished yet. Therefore the categories added here were incorrect and speculative. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, the company is in administration, and if it does stop trading eventually, the categories would have to be added back in, once that has been confirmed. Benfskye1 (talk) 11:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and that would be the correct time to add them. Right now, it's speculation, until if/when it's actually confirmed that they cease trading. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:09, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Knitsey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Huw Edwards have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Knitsey (talk) 11:04, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Huw Edwards. Knitsey (talk) 11:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's it, you should now be blocked.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 11:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I am fucking done with Wikipedia! And fuck you Jimmy Wales for all the constant fundraisers you give out! Good riddance to you all! Benfskye1 (talk) 11:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What got into you? It's a shame to be banned for such blatant vandalism after making so many relevant edits over the course of past 2 years. CaptainPermaban (talk) 11:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just had a mental breakdown, because I have autism. My mind was just basically telling me to vandalise that article. I’m so sorry for doing that. Will I ever be unblocked? Benfskye1 (talk) 12:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry to hear that, I hope you are better now. I guess after some time elapses you might try to appeal the block and explain your situation. I am a relatively new user, so I don't have experience with these matters, but it seems to me that if you point out your previous long record of good faith edits you might have a chance. CaptainPermaban (talk) 12:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already did try to appeal the block. The reason I gave to the appeal was to edit things again but innocently. Benfskye1 (talk) 12:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Best advice to give is give it some time. take a few days to hopefully bring yourself back into a better space of mind, then reflect upon what happened. Administrators will be looking for you to address what went wrong, and you'll be asked to show you're taking steps to prevent it happening again. Danners430 (talk) 12:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Huw_Edwards.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:26, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benfskye1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here To edit articles innocentlyBenfskye1 (talk) 12:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Revision as of 12:59, 31 July 2024 edit Yamla (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators 147,664 edits Decline ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:42, 31 July 2024 edit undo Benfskye1 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 986 edits No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{unblock\|reason=I apologise for my outburst this afternoon which caused me to edit inappropriately and against the rules which I fully understand why I have been blocked. I have Autism and was having a momentary meltdown which caused the whole situation. I have previously had good standing and have edited correctly with useful information and updates and would request that, having had time to think about my actions and reflect, I would request that it be reviewed [[User:Benfskye1\|Benfskye1]] ([[User talk:Benfskye1#top\|talk]]) 13:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)}}

	== A belated welcome! ==		== A belated welcome! ==