Talk:Tim Sheehy (businessman): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Recreation: Reply |
Wikishovel (talk | contribs) c |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::I'm not opposed to a redirect. But I still don't think he needs his own article. [[User:Intothatdarkness|Intothat]][[User_talk:Intothatdarkness|darkness]] 17:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
:::I'm not opposed to a redirect. But I still don't think he needs his own article. [[User:Intothatdarkness|Intothat]][[User_talk:Intothatdarkness|darkness]] 17:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
||
* Firm delete so far. [[User:Radiohist|Radiohist]] ([[User talk:Radiohist|talk]]) 16:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
* Firm delete so far. [[User:Radiohist|Radiohist]] ([[User talk:Radiohist|talk]]) 16:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
||
* The outcome of the AFD was to redirect [[Tim Sheehy (American politician)]]. This new article was created as a redirect to the same target [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tim_Sheehy_(businessman)&oldid=1246684965], on the grounds that he's [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timothy_Sheehy&diff=prev&oldid=1246685469 "not a politician yet"], and another editor came along a week later and recreated the article from the redirect. A Google search for him, minus the word "Senate", [https://www.google.com/search?q=time+sheehy+bridger+-senate&oq=time+sheehy+bridger+-senate turns up no significant coverate in reliable sources] as a businessman or a soldier. The US is about three weeks away from a national election, and ''all'' of the major candidates are getting heavy press coverage. This was roughly the rationale, per [[WP:NPOL]], for redirect by strong consensus in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Sheehy (American politician)]]. So this article should be deleted, as it's really a renamed repost of [[Tim Sheehy (American politician)]]. If he wins, then that article should obviously be un-redirected and expanded. [[User:Wikishovel|Wikishovel]] ([[User talk:Wikishovel|talk]]) 08:50, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:50, 9 October 2024
Recreation
Not sure if the circumstances have changed since the last AfD, since Sheehy has attracted significantly more media coverage (though not cited here). Pinging previous participants: Muboshgu, Enos733, Tbennert, Radiohist, Intothatdarkness, Ser!, Wikishovel, BottleOfChocolateMilk, and SportingFlyer. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm still in the Delete camp, at least until after the election. Intothatdarkness 15:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I still believe this should remain a redirect. - Enos733 (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not opposed to a redirect. But I still don't think he needs his own article. Intothatdarkness 17:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I still believe this should remain a redirect. - Enos733 (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Firm delete so far. Radiohist (talk) 16:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- The outcome of the AFD was to redirect Tim Sheehy (American politician). This new article was created as a redirect to the same target [1], on the grounds that he's "not a politician yet", and another editor came along a week later and recreated the article from the redirect. A Google search for him, minus the word "Senate", turns up no significant coverate in reliable sources as a businessman or a soldier. The US is about three weeks away from a national election, and all of the major candidates are getting heavy press coverage. This was roughly the rationale, per WP:NPOL, for redirect by strong consensus in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Sheehy (American politician). So this article should be deleted, as it's really a renamed repost of Tim Sheehy (American politician). If he wins, then that article should obviously be un-redirected and expanded. Wikishovel (talk) 08:50, 9 October 2024 (UTC)