Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blaxstocatamazon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:39, 1 December 2024

Blaxstocatamazon

Blaxstocatamazon (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blaxstocatamazon/Archive.

30 November 2024

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

Kpftwqnj23 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

An SPA who registered a hour ago and has filed a malformed SPI claiming that I'm sock of Singora because I helped in uncovering Singora's socks and believing that they are related to IAC above and further stated "Such systematised violations of Code of Conduct and Terms of Use must not be allowed to convert Wikipedia into a platform for defamation by anonymous WMF user accounts against genuine registered Hindu organisations with a prominent internet presence.(emphasis mine) , I think we all know "which Hindu organisations" they are talking about (Hindu Raksha Dal).[1][2][3][4], i believe this is just more harrassment like the legal notice for defamation i recieved before.- Ratnahastin (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Clerk endorsed - worth a look given the previous search found others. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:57, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kpftwqnj23 is the same as recent socks listed in this case. Another recent confirmed sock is Zkty2s67 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). There's increasing evidence linking the socks from this case with the other socks recently reported at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DavidWood11. I'm not certain about a direct link to DavidWood11, but of the two cases, this one seems to have some of the older accounts (and to repeat from the previous report, some relation to LTA/IAC seems incredibly likely). -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 03:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 {{SPIpriorcases}}
 ===30 November 2024===
-{{SPI case status|endorse}}
+{{SPI case status|checked}}
 ====Suspected sockpuppets====
 {{sock list|1=Kpftwqnj23|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed -->
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
 *{{Endorse}} - worth a look given the previous search found others. [[User:TheSandDoctor|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">The</span><span style="color:#009933; font-weight:bold;">SandDoctor</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:TheSandDoctor|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 02:57, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
+*Kpftwqnj23 is the same as recent socks listed in this case. Another recent confirmed sock is {{checkuser|Zkty2s67}}. There's increasing evidence linking the socks from this case with the other socks recently reported at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DavidWood11]]. I'm not certain about a direct link to DavidWood11, but of the two cases, this one seems to have some of the older accounts (and to repeat from the previous report, some relation to LTA/IAC seems incredibly likely). -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 03:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
 ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->