Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BUZZLIGHTYEAR99: Difference between revisions
DanielRigal (talk | contribs) Adding new report for BUZZLIGHTYEAR99. |
PhilKnight (talk | contribs) →02 December 2024: CU decline |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===02 December 2024=== |
===02 December 2024=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|CUdecline}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
{{sock list|1=136.49.20.107|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
{{sock list|1=136.49.20.107|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
* {{CUdecline}} - the checkuser tool cannot be used to connect an account to an IP for privacy reasons. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 21:29, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 21:30, 2 December 2024
BUZZLIGHTYEAR99
BUZZLIGHTYEAR99 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BUZZLIGHTYEAR99/Archive.
02 December 2024
– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
Suspected sockpuppets
I came across this IP when they were inserting incorrect information in Justine Musk, which I warned them for, but looking at their other contributions I believe that they are a sockpuppet of BUZZLIGHTYEAR99 by virtue of their connection to User:Glass Snow, who is blocked as a sock of BUZZLIGHTYEAR99. The connection is that they have reinstated Glass Snow's reverted edits (with minor changes) on three different articles (here, here and here) and also that BUZZLIGHTYEAR99 has previously had a sock IP inside range 136.49/16, albeit a year ago. DanielRigal (talk) 21:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Check declined by a checkuser - the checkuser tool cannot be used to connect an account to an IP for privacy reasons. PhilKnight (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
