User talk:Alejandroinmensidad

Stop this behaviour at Pedro Sánchez

Accusing others of vandalism without any evidence, as you are doing at Pedro Sánchez, is a blatant violation of WP:NPA, more so while engaging in openly disruptive behaviour. Please, stop and engage in discussion, Impru20^talk 10:18, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

You are deleting the text and references of the article. That is vandalism. Alejandroinmensidad (talk) 10:20, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

I am just deleting unfounded claims you inserted in violation of both WP:NPOV and WP:OR. As you kept adding those, I resorted to providing more context and sources, then you resorted to use the article as a WP:FORUM and kept adding false facts and claims.

As it is stated at Talk:Pedro Sánchez: This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous.

Bold edits are not vandalism, specially if conducted in compliance with that policy, and accusing others of vandalism just because you do not like their edits is a personal attack (WP:AVOIDVANDAL). I invite you to engage in consensus building discussions instead of keeping using edits to attack other editors, as well as stopping breaching BLP by adding openly libellous material to articles on living persons. Cheers. Impru20^talk 10:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

What's your justification for removing sourced content as you did here? Impru20^talk 10:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

I haven't deleted anything. I have replaced the text that you have deleted. Alejandroinmensidad (talk) 10:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

You are deleting text from many users with no reason. It´s VANDALISM. The text that you deleted are true facts that explain events of the government of Pedro Sánchez. Alejandroinmensidad (talk) 10:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

You have just deleted sourced text. Why?

The text you keep adding are false claims and misinterpretations of the sources you yourself keep adding, in a clear violation of the WP:BLP policy, which requires the outright removal of contention material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced. You have been explained what is vandalism and what is not vandalism and yet you keep engaging in such a behaviour over and over and over again, without giving any explanation for the context you keep adding. I have now brought the issue to WP:BLPN. Impru20^talk 10:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

I haven't deleted anything. The text I have replaced has reliable references and you are deleting it for no reason. That text is not mine, it is from another user. Alejandroinmensidad (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

You have deleted this text.

I am adding additional references which you keep removing by replacing it with poorly sourced text (it is you who keep adding and re-adding it, not "another user". And you are inserting new contentious claims yourself). Impru20^talk 10:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

You have deleted the text and references that another user entered. If you want to add references, do so without deleting this user's text and references. Alejandroinmensidad (talk) 10:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Do you even read anything of what I am saying? Also, why shouldn't we replace poorly sourced material when WP:BLP requires us to do so? Do you have any interest with this other user you keep mentioning to keep adding and re-adding their contents? Impru20^talk 11:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

You are deleting the text and reference of many users. It´s vandalism. Alejandroinmensidad (talk) 11:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Possible misuse of multiple accounts

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Napoleonbuenoenparte. Thank you. Impru20^talk 11:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Isaidnoway (talk) 14:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Impru20^talk 22:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Alejandroinmensidad,

Please come to the discussion on ANI to discuss problems pointed out about edits you have made. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:55, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, OK Alejandroinmensidad (talk) 22:10, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring at Pedro Sánchez

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JimRenge (talk) 12:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)