Jump to content

Coelophysis: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cydebot (talk | contribs)
m Robot - Removing category Southwestern Dinosaurs per CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 May 2.
Line 63: Line 63:
In the early 1990s, there was debate over the diagnostic characteristics of the first specimens collected, compared to the material excavated at the Ghost Ranch ''Coelophysis'' quarry. Some paleontologists were of the opinion that the original specimens were not diagnostic beyond themselves and, therefore, that the name ''C. bauri'' could not be applied to any additional specimens. They therefore applied a different name, ''Rioarribasaurus'',<ref>Hunt and Lucas, (1991). "''Rioarribasaurus'', a new name for a Late Triassic dinosaur from New Mexico (USA)''. ''Paläontol. Z.'' 65 p. 191-198.</ref> to the Ghost Ranch quarry specimens.
In the early 1990s, there was debate over the diagnostic characteristics of the first specimens collected, compared to the material excavated at the Ghost Ranch ''Coelophysis'' quarry. Some paleontologists were of the opinion that the original specimens were not diagnostic beyond themselves and, therefore, that the name ''C. bauri'' could not be applied to any additional specimens. They therefore applied a different name, ''Rioarribasaurus'',<ref>Hunt and Lucas, (1991). "''Rioarribasaurus'', a new name for a Late Triassic dinosaur from New Mexico (USA)''. ''Paläontol. Z.'' 65 p. 191-198.</ref> to the Ghost Ranch quarry specimens.


Since the numerous well-preserved Ghost Ranch specimes were used as ''Coelophysis'' in most of the scientific literature, the use of ''Rioarribasaurus'' would have been very inconvenient for researchers, so a petition was given to have the [[type specimen]] of ''Coelophysis'' transferred from the poorly-preserved original specimen to one of the well-preserved Ghost ranch specimens. In the end, the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature ([[ICZN]]) voted to make one of the Ghost Ranch samples the actual type specimen for ''Coelophysis'' and dispose of the name ''Rioarribasaurus'' altogether (declaring it a ''nomen rejectum'', or "rejected name"), thus resolving the confusion. The name ''Coelophysis'' therefore became a ''nomen conservandum'' ("conserved name").
Since the numerous well-preserved Ghost Ranch specimes were used as ''Coelophysis'' in most of the scientific literature, the use of ''Rioarribasaurus'' would have been very inconvenient for researchers, so a petition was given to have the [[type specimen]] of ''Coelophysis'' transferred from the poorly-preserved original specimen to one of the well-preserved Ghost ranch specimens.<ref>Colbert, Harris, Charig, Dodson, Gillette, Ostrom and Weishampel, 1992. Coelurus bauri Cope, 1887 (currently Coelophysis bauri; Reptilia, Saurischia): Proposed replacement of the lectotype by a neotype. Bull. Zool. Nomencl. 49 p. 276-279.<ref> In the end, the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature ([[ICZN]]) voted to make one of the Ghost Ranch samples the actual type specimen for ''Coelophysis'' and dispose of the name ''Rioarribasaurus'' altogether (declaring it a ''nomen rejectum'', or "rejected name"), thus resolving the confusion. The name ''Coelophysis'' therefore became a ''nomen conservandum'' ("conserved name").<ref>International Commision on Zoological Nomenclature, 1996. Opinion 1842. Coelurus bauri Cope, 1887 (currently Coelophysis bauri; Reptilia, Saurischia): lectotype replaced by a neotype. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature. 53, 142-144.<ref> This, however, may change with a redescription of Coelophysis, in regard to new Coelophysis remains designated as the topotypes of Coelophysis bauri.<ref>Sullivan, R.M., Lucas, S.G., Heckert, A., Hunt, A.P., 1996. The type locality of Coelophysis, a Late Triassic dinosaur from north-central New Mexico (USA). ''Paläontol. Z.'' 70 p. 245-255.<ref>


Sullivan & Lucas (1999) suggested that the original type specimen was referable to what they thought was a newly discovered coelophysid, ''[[Eucoelophysis|Eucoelophysis baldwini]]''.<ref>Sullivan and Lucas (1999). "''Eucoelophysis baldwini'', a new theropod dinosaur from the Upper Triassic of New Mexico, and the status of the original types of ''Coelophysis''". ''Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology'' 19(1): 81-90</ref> However, subsequent studies have shown that ''Eucoelophysis'' was misidentified, and is actually a primitive, non-dinosaurian [[ornithodira]]n closely related to ''[[Silesaurus]]''. Therefore, the original type specimen of ''Coelophysis'' cannot be considered a specimen of ''Eucoelophysis''.<ref>R. B. Irmis, S. J. Nesbitt, and W. G. Parker. (2005). "A critical review of the Triassic North American dinosaur record." In A. W. A. Kellner, D. D. R. Henriques, & T. Rodrigues (eds.), ''II Congresso Latino-Americano de Paleontologia de Vertebrados, Boletim de Resumos''. Museum Nacional/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 139.</ref>
Sullivan & Lucas (1999) suggested that the original type specimen was referable to what they thought was a newly discovered coelophysid, ''[[Eucoelophysis|Eucoelophysis baldwini]]''.<ref>Sullivan and Lucas (1999). "''Eucoelophysis baldwini'', a new theropod dinosaur from the Upper Triassic of New Mexico, and the status of the original types of ''Coelophysis''". ''Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology'' 19(1): 81-90</ref> However, subsequent studies have shown that ''Eucoelophysis'' was misidentified, and is actually a primitive, non-dinosaurian [[ornithodira]]n closely related to ''[[Silesaurus]]''. Therefore, the original type specimen of ''Coelophysis'' cannot be considered a specimen of ''Eucoelophysis''.<ref>R. B. Irmis, S. J. Nesbitt, and W. G. Parker. (2005). "A critical review of the Triassic North American dinosaur record." In A. W. A. Kellner, D. D. R. Henriques, & T. Rodrigues (eds.), ''II Congresso Latino-Americano de Paleontologia de Vertebrados, Boletim de Resumos''. Museum Nacional/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 139.</ref>

Revision as of 15:15, 31 May 2007

Coelophysis
Temporal range: Late Triassic
Profile of Coelophysis bauri.
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Superorder:
Order:
Suborder:
Superfamily:
Family:
Genus:
Coelophysis

Cope, 1889
Binomial name
Coelophysis bauri
(Cope, 1887)
Synonyms
  • Coelurus bauri Cope, 1887
  • Tanystropheus bauri (Cope, 1887) Cope, 1887
  • Rioarribasaurus colberti Hunt & Lucas, 1991
  • Syntarsus colberti (Hunt & Lucas, 1991) Paul, 1993

One of the earliest known dinosaurs, Coelophysis (see-low-FYS-iss) meaning "hollow form" in reference to its hollow bones (Greek κοιλος/koilos meaning 'hollow' and φυσις/physis meaning 'form') is a small, carnivorous biped from North America. It first appeared in the Mid Triassic Period, around 228 million years ago.

Description

Coelophysis bauri is the earliest dinosaur known from a number of complete fossil skeletons. C. bauri was a lightly built dinosaur, between two to three meters in length, and less than a meter tall at the hips. The name Coelophysis means "hollow form" or "hollow process", so named because of its hollow limb bones.

Despite being an early dinosaur, the evolution of the theropod body form had already advanced greatly from creatures like Herrerasaurus and Eoraptor. Coelophysis had an elongated snout with large fenestrae which helped to reduce skull weight, while narrow struts of bones preserved the structural integrity of the skull. The neck had a pronounced sigmoid curve.

The torso of Coelophysis conforms to the basic theropod body shape, but the pectoral girdle displays some interesting special characteristics: C. bauri had a furcula (wishbone), the earliest known example in a dinosaur. Coelophysis also preserves the ancestral condition of possessing four digits on the hand (manus). It had only three functional digits, the fourth embedded in the flesh of the hand.

File:Coelophysis2.jpg
Coelophysis skeletal diagram.

The pelvis and hindlimbs of C. bauri are also slight variations on the theropod body plan. It has the open acetabulum and straight ankle hinge that define the Dinosauria. The hindlimb ended in a three-toed foot (pes), with a raised hallux.

The tail of Coelophysis had an unusual structure within its interlocking prezygapophysis of its vertebrae, which formed a semi-rigid lattice, apparently to stop the tail from moving up and down.[1] This may have let the tail act as a rudder or counterweight when the animal was maneuvering at speed.

Paleobiology

Coelophysis Animatronics model, Natural History Museum, London displaying supposed canibalistic behaviour.

Coelophysis was probably opportunistic, catching live prey and scavenging.[citation needed] The teeth were typical of predatory dinosaurs, blade-like and recurved with fine serrations on both anterior and posterior edges. They were rooted in the jaws in sockets, and were continually replaced throughout the animal's life.[citation needed]

Since our knowledge of Coelophysis comes mainly from the specimens excavated at Ghost Ranch, there is a tendency to see this massive congregation of animals as evidence for huge packs of Coelophysis roaming the land (as seen in the television series Walking with Dinosaurs). There is no evidence for this. What the deposit does tell us is that large numbers of Coelophysis, along with other Triassic animals, were buried together. Some of the evidence from the taphonomy of the site indicates that these animals may have been gathered together to feed or drink from a depleted water hole or to feed on a spawning run of fish, then became buried in a catastrophic flash flood.

It has been suggested that C. bauri was a cannibal, based on juvenile specimens found "within" the abdominal cavities of some Ghost Ranch specimens. However, Rob Gay showed in 2002 that these specimens were misinterpreted (several specimens of "juvenile coelophysids" were actually small crurotarsan reptiles such as Hesperosuchus), and there is no longer any evidence to support cannibalistic behavior in Coelophysis.[2] Gay's study was corroborated in 2006 in a subsequent study by Nesbitt et al.[3] There may be other evidence coming to light that may show stomach contents from some of these specimens, which might bring greater resolution to the subject.[4]

Two forms of Coelophysis have been found, a more gracile form and a slightly more robust form. Opinion among paleontologists is now that these were female and male variants (see: sexual dimorphism).[5][6][7][8]

History of discovery

Edward Drinker Cope first named Coelophysis in 1889[9] during his competition to name species with Othniel Charles Marsh, known as the "Bone Wars". An amateur fossil collector, David Baldwin, had found the first remains of the dinosaur in 1881. The type species, C. bauri was named for Baur, one of the many fossil collectors who supplied Cope. However, these first finds were too poorly preserved to give a complete picture of this new dinosaur.

In 1947, a substantial 'graveyard' of Coelophysis fossils was found in New Mexico, at the Ghost Ranch, close to the original find. So many fossils together were probably the result of a flash flood, which swept away a large number of Coelophysis and buried them quickly and simultaneously. In fact, it seems such flooding was commonplace during this period of the Earth's history and, indeed, the Petrified Forest of nearby Arizona is caused by a preserved log jam of tree trunks that were caught in one such flood. Edwin H. Colbert made a comprehensive study[5] of all the fossils found up to that date, and it is from him that we take most of our information about Coelophysis. The Ghost Ranch specimens were so numerous, including many well-preserved specimens, that one of them has since become the diagnostic, or type specimen, for the entire genus, replacing the original, poorly preserved specimen (see Classification below).

Since the Ghost Ranch specimens were discovered, more skeletons have been found in Arizona, New Mexico and an as-yet unconfirmed specimen from Utah, including both adults and juveniles. The deposits where Coelophysis has been discovered date from the late Carnian to the early Norian faunal stages of the Triassic Period.

Classification

Coelophysis mount in the Natural History Museum, London.

Coelophysis is a distinct taxonomic unit (genus), composed of a single species, C. bauri. Two additional species were originally described in addition to C. bauri, C. longicollis, and C. willistoni, however they are not diagnostic and are considered synonymous with C. bauri. C. rhodesiensis is probably part of this generic complex, and is known from the Jurassic of southern Africa (see below for more). In phylogenetic taxonomy, Coelophysis is treated as a clade within the Coelophysidae.

In the early 1990s, there was debate over the diagnostic characteristics of the first specimens collected, compared to the material excavated at the Ghost Ranch Coelophysis quarry. Some paleontologists were of the opinion that the original specimens were not diagnostic beyond themselves and, therefore, that the name C. bauri could not be applied to any additional specimens. They therefore applied a different name, Rioarribasaurus,[10] to the Ghost Ranch quarry specimens.

Since the numerous well-preserved Ghost Ranch specimes were used as Coelophysis in most of the scientific literature, the use of Rioarribasaurus would have been very inconvenient for researchers, so a petition was given to have the type specimen of Coelophysis transferred from the poorly-preserved original specimen to one of the well-preserved Ghost ranch specimens.Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). However, subsequent studies have shown that Eucoelophysis was misidentified, and is actually a primitive, non-dinosaurian ornithodiran closely related to Silesaurus. Therefore, the original type specimen of Coelophysis cannot be considered a specimen of Eucoelophysis.[11]

In addition to all of this, there is a competing controversy with another coelophysoid, Megapnosaurus, which many regard to be congeneric with Coelophysis.[12][7] To make matters more confusing, Paul[13] suggested that Coelophysis should be placed in Megapnosaurus (then known as Syntarsus) to get around the above-mentioned taxonomic confusion.

In a situation affecting many dinosaur genera, many specimens were originally classified as new species but were in fact species of Coelophysis. For example, Prof. Mignon Talbot's 1911 discovery[14] which she labeled Podokesaurus holyokensis, may be related to (or is) Coelophysis. In addition, C. posthumus, named by Friedrich von Huene in 1908, also needs reclassification and is tentatively titled Halticosaurus longotarsus at the moment.

Trivia

Coelophysis was the second dinosaur in space. Although Maiasaura had been taken into space three years earlier, a Coelophysis skull from the Carnegie Museum of Natural History was aboard the Space Shuttle Endeavour mission STS-89 when it left the atmosphere on January 22, 1998. It was also taken onto the space station Mir before being returned to Earth.

Coelophysis is also the state fossil of New Mexico.

Coelophysis were featured in the BBC television series Walking with Dinosaurs, and in When Dinosaurs Roamed America, in which they are depicted hunting insects. The 1974 children's television series Land of the Lost also featured a Coelophysis, nicknamed "Spot".

References

  1. ^ Gay, Robert J. 2001. "An unusual adaptation in the caudal vertebrae of Coelophysis bauri (Dinosauria: Theropoda)." PaleoBios 21: supplement to number 2. Page 55.
  2. ^ Gay, Robert J. 2002. "The myth of cannibalism in Coelophysis bauri." Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22(3); 57A
  3. ^ Nesbitt, S.J., Turner, A.H., Erickson, G.M., and Norell, M.A. (2006). "Prey choice and cannibalistic behaviour in the theropod Coelophys." Biology Letters, First Cite Early Online Publishing doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0524.
  4. ^ Rinehart, L., Hunt, A., Lucas, S., Heckert, A., and Smith, J. (2005). "New evidence of cannibalism in the Late Triassic (Apachean) dinosaur, Coelophysis bauri (Theropoda: Ceratosauria)." Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 25(105A).
  5. ^ a b Colbert, Edwin. (1989) "The Triassic Dinosaur Coelophysis". Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin. Cite error: The named reference "Colbert89" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  6. ^ Colbert, Edwin. 1990. in Dinosaur Systematics.
  7. ^ a b Paul GS. (1988) Predatory Dinosaurs of the World
  8. ^ Gay, R. 2005. Sexual Dimorphism in the Early Jurassic Theropod Dinosaur Dilophosaurus and a Comparison with Other Related Forms; pp. 277-283 in K. Carpenter (ed.), The Carnivorous Dinosaurs. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
  9. ^ Cope ED.(1889) "On a new genus of Triassic Dinosauria". American Naturalist xxiii p. 626
  10. ^ Hunt and Lucas, (1991). "Rioarribasaurus, a new name for a Late Triassic dinosaur from New Mexico (USA). Paläontol. Z. 65 p. 191-198.
  11. ^ R. B. Irmis, S. J. Nesbitt, and W. G. Parker. (2005). "A critical review of the Triassic North American dinosaur record." In A. W. A. Kellner, D. D. R. Henriques, & T. Rodrigues (eds.), II Congresso Latino-Americano de Paleontologia de Vertebrados, Boletim de Resumos. Museum Nacional/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 139.
  12. ^ Downs, Alex. 2000. in "Dinosaurs of New Mexico," New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletin.
  13. ^ Paul GS. (1993) in New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletin.
  14. ^ Talbot M (1911). "Podokesaurus holyokensis, a new dinosaur from the Triassic of the Connecticut Valley." Amer. Jour. Sci. 4 469-479