Talk:Diurnality: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:Diurnal animal to Talk:Diurnality: Recommended on talk page (no complaints) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Of course it's a red link - the page doesn't exist yet. [[User:Richard001|Richard001]] 23:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC) |
Of course it's a red link - the page doesn't exist yet. [[User:Richard001|Richard001]] 23:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:I agree. The suggestion was originally made over 2 months ago without complaint, so I moved it. '''[[User:Jhall1468|<font color="#0084C9">J. Hall</font>]]''' • <sup>([[User_Talk:Jhall1468|<font color=#004000>Talk</font>]])</sup> 05:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:03, 29 September 2007
Template:Animals A large portion of the human population, that's funny --Nutschig 18:33, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Yes, I'd like to see some data (cite, etc.,) regarding this statement, a "large portion" -- T4exanadu 11:19, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- I have changed it to what I think is more accurate. The human species is diurnal but has adapted to nocturnal activity also with the aid of artificial lighting and nightclubs. Nurg 11:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Name
Suggest we move to diurnality to match nocturnality. Richard001 10:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Um..I would agree if that wasn't a red link.Silver seren 13:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Of course it's a red link - the page doesn't exist yet. Richard001 23:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. The suggestion was originally made over 2 months ago without complaint, so I moved it. J. Hall • (Talk) 05:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)