Jump to content

User talk:C1k3: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 83: Line 83:


== Eh? ==
== Eh? ==
I'm not sure. I'm still pretty new to wikipedia.
I'm not sure. I'm still pretty new to wikipedia. [[User:Kittycatbeck|Kittycatbeck]] ([[User talk:Kittycatbeck|talk]])

Revision as of 03:34, 29 November 2008

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, C1k3! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Daniel 04:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Guy

All is not lost; membership in a notable band is sufficient to be inelligible for speedy deletion; I removed the tag. It may still be deleted after WP:AFD, but it's around now and if improved may survive an AFD challenge. Carlossuarez46 02:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The band has been deleted, you may wish to tag the album as well "Anthrosects in Effigy EP". Cheers, Carlossuarez46 04:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jazz fusion is just an umbrella genre for various subgenres, such as smooth jazz, jazz rock, crossover jazz and free funk. Somewhat like jazz is just an umbrella genre for bebop, hard bop, dixieland, free jazz, etc. Jazz rock is a legitimate subgenre of jazz fusion, and therefore shall remain. (Mind meal 07:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]


Pop Mod: Need Some Insight

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Pumpmeup

Seems this guy is throwing his weight around and threatning people with bans for edits that he cites as "vandalizm", could you back up his claims by looking at what he reverted for each, or is he abusing his power? Thanks in any case. I dont like being warned for something as mundane as Living Next Door To Alice


Dr. R.K.Z 08:42 AM November 28th 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. R.K.Z (talkcontribs) 08:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ultimate adventure.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ultimate adventure.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


User Box

Hey dude, I tweaked your user box. You had a syntax error in there that was messing up the rendering on your user page. Only thing that looks like it's not included is age. Feel free to leave, tweak, or revert if you like. - Dave C.talk | Esperanza —Preceding comment was added at 16:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NP, gotta look out for a fellow Washingtonian. - Dave C.talk | Esperanza 16:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personl attacks

If you make any more personal attacks you will be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 07:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, and it is by no means indicative of my general attitude toward dissension on Wikipedia. In this particular case, however, I apologize for nothing. C1k3 (talk) 07:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments

Incorrect, I see that you are 22 years of age. Wait until you become older! In any cause you failed to read all wiki policies. Furthermore speech has limits, being Jewish I am sure you will understand this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thright (talkcontribs) 01:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, really Wikipedia is not censored. I'm really sorry if you don't like it, but that's the way it is. Also, sorry to C1k3 for responding on your talk page. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
1st Policy, "Reasons for deletion include but are not limited content that does not belong in an encyclopedia. It is clear that this content would not be found in encyclopdia. 2nd,Wikipedia is not a directory." The current form of the article is nothing less than a stub of the word. 2 for starters. 3rd LAW, speech has limits, one is social good. This may be more advanced for some of the users on wiki as I am sure many have not studied law. Thright (talk) 01:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thright (talkcontribs)

I saw you tagged the above article for csd with the comment that "it is a vanity page". It is generally not a good idea to use the term "vanity" when describing articles about people for a couple of reasons. First, it is accusatory and discouraging and kind of bitey to new users. Second, calling an article "vanity" could be a defamatory assertion unless you can clearly show they were responsible for it. Just some friendly advice. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! KnightLago (talk) 05:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Irish Evil

You can blame a webcomic for this one: here. -- Kesh (talk) 02:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete Morbid Axe?

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Dark Star (film). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 07:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1/4 part Jewish

how can u be a part of anything?! u are Jewish or ur not. u are human or ur not. Zycriss (talk) 19:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

whats ur race then? you don't believe that your skin color is ur race do u? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zycriss (talkcontribs) 03:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

u don't even know your own race is. your race is homo sapien. homo is man, sapien means wise. most people don't know there own race. now if u want to call your species Caucasian u can, but your kind, your race is homo sapien. all evolutionist are races. they all so morons to believe we evolved from rocks. it takes a lot of faith to believe in that. ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zycriss (talkcontribs) 00:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

stop listening to evolutionists. they don't know what Kind and Species means. darwin's book is called origin of species ...... (a really long title) Species evolves but the Kind cannot. a Dog can only produce a Dog. the Dog is the Kind. the Scottie dog is the Species. it can produce another Scottie or something else. here watch this u might learn some truth. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mni-SRtG7xY or http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2528412371399195162

im sure u wont. your a nazi. all ways has an excuse to do evil and be evil. your heart loves sin more then anything in the world. that's why u cant handle the true definition of evil. 

evil: One who thinks of himself and put himself before others. why: That is what you do when you commit sin, that is one of the reasons why they are sin. Everything happens for many reasons not for a reason. Only a child would think, say, and believe that.```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zycriss (talkcontribs) 16:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glitch?

One of your edits appears to have removed several comments. I've restored. Yngvarr (t) (c) 20:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G1 tagging

Hi there. Could I please remind you to tag pages for deletion under the G1 criteria only if they clearly meet the criteria? For example, Neil thormann should have been tagged as G10, not G1, because that would have given it a much higher priority on the deletion scale. Anyway, hopefully, you can tag things correctly next time. Thanks in advance. - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 04:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eh?

I'm not sure. I'm still pretty new to wikipedia. Kittycatbeck (talk)