User talk:Theoldanarchist

Click to show archived versions of this talk page

-none yet-

Click to show welcome and instructions

Welcome to my talk page

Hellow and welcome to my talk page (sort of like a message board). PLEASE feel free to leave any comment that comes to mind here. Even a dumb-sounding question is no bother to me. I quite enjoy the human involvement! ;) I am ready to archive so it's no problem how small your idea/question may be.

Please add new topics to the bottom of the page or just click on the link in the orange box below. If you post a message on this page, I will reply on this page to avoid spliting the discussion. If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will be watching it, so please reply there rather than here. Remember to WATCH this page if you have not set it to do it automatically so you can see when I respond.

(Design derived from User:Nathanrdotcom with modification by User:Mboverload)

You may start a new correspondence by clicking here.
If you have already started a correspondence with me ON THIS PAGE, I WILL RESPOND ON THIS PAGE. If I have sent you a message, post your response there.

Charles (theoldanarchist): Several months ago, I failed to assume good faith with you and you wrote me about it. I am nearly positive I apologised and explained my failure to this, in a reply posted in your talk page. Yet I can not find it, either in your talk archive, nor even in my contribution list. I reapol;ogise, and request your help finding it, if I am right in thinking I did write it. I am 1 of those who is very reluctant to try to hide criticism, or even promote attempted resolution, but I beleive in this case I have taken that policy too far. My (beleived)reply in no wise attempted to damage your reputation, and I took complete rsponsibility, and explained how the mis-hap occured; yet I think that failure to put the reply on my own talk page really goes past the point of humility, and into severe self-abnigation (like a bilboard on me saying: "I don't even apologise") and wish to rectify that by so posting, asap. Again this is in no-wise meant as any kind of an attack, just an attempt to amend a possible self abnegation instantiation, that should not be).Thaddeus Slamp (talk) 04:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC) lakelynnbirds i have lived out here in lakelynn 42 yrs,the lake belongs to us all,people who live on the lake think they own it,far as the birds the people had no right to kill the birds,they come certain times of yr to rest on the lake then they leave,i hope this kind of act will not be performed again,the lake is becomming a water mokison lake,thats what they need to worry about,cleaning up the lilly patties and the snakes,after all this rain the snakes are comming in peoples yards like crazy,thankyou cbanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.154.61.243 (talk) 15:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC) Troubles Arbitration Case: Amendment for discretionary sanctions As a party in The Troubles arbitration case I am notifying you that an amendment request has been posted here. For the Arbitration Committee Seddon talk|WikimediaUK 16:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)