User talk:C.Fred

Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. Misplaced threads can get lost and go unnoticed, especially if I'm in a busy or similar status.

If you are a registered user, I will usually reply to your talk page unless you request otherwise. I may reply to your talk page and copy my response here to preserve a thread or note that the issue has been dealt with. Likewise, I may also reply here and leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page for the sake of threading.

If you are an unregistered user, I will reply on this page and leave a {{Talkback}} template on your IP address' User talk page.

Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.

Uncivil comments may be deleted summarily.

Reverted your edits concerning fuze

My husband, who is an engineer and a recipient of the Charles Christian Lauritsen award, pointed out the misspelling. As he is a recognized expert in this field, I do believe he would know how to spell fuze. Here is the dictionary definition: [1] And as referred to in the article it deals with a proximity fuze. That is the correct spelling based on article usage and definition.

Respectfully,

LittleRedWriter (talk) 16:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)LittleRedWriter

Defintion and spelling of fuse at the Cambridge Dictionary. Respectfully, --Ischium (talk) 12:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Prod. Codes

I'm getting them from Showfax (before the pages got deleted) and from the Physical Copy of the Disney Channel schedule. Besides the fact that the prod. codes posted over at The Suite Life on Deck, Wizards of Waverly Place are not be referenced and yet they don't get reverted. I'll go ahead and revert all prod. codes on those pages since they are not referenced. Thanks for the help. - Alec2011 (talk) 18:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision deletion

Could you look at this DIFF and see if it qualifies for Revision deletion? TIA ----moreno oso (talk) 12:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Protection request

I've requested that Jennette McCurdy be semi-protected. --Confession0791 (talk) 00:51, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

David Amoo

It seems pretty likely that David Amoo has a chance of making him debut tonight for Liverpool FC. Any chance you can send a copy of the previously deleted article (which failed WP:ATH and WP:GNG) to my sandbox, so I can tidy it up in preparation for adding again this evening if he makes his first team debut. Many thanks Steve-Ho (talk) 05:42, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

List of Ice Age characters

Could you, please, defend your rush statements "..deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of Ice Age characters.. Some of the changes, such as from Neanderthal to Cro-Magnon, are clearly inappropriate..."?

Any references to Neanderthals still living 20'000 years ago (time of the Ice Age movie action), or possessing skills for making advanced tools and decorations of Upper Paleolithic, clearly shown in the movie, or domesticating animals (dogs)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.204.92.203 (talk) 14:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

The rest of the article uses the term "Neanderthal." Based on that, your spot changes are what appear inappropriate. Really, in this case, what's relevant is not whether Neanderthals or Cro-Magnons were the appropriate skill set but what the movie creators intended them to be; I'll go checking the reviews and secondary sources to see if they use one term or the other most of the time. —C.Fred (talk) 14:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Simon Birch

It may be time to semi-protect the Simon Birch page. IP 98.225.234.245 came back again and re-added the false information about Adrienne Bailon. Please re-block that IP addresses. - RRabbit42 (talk) 01:20, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Page Deletion

Hi, I am attempting to create a page for my fraternity called Tau Phi Sigma, the page was deleted and I am unsure of how to revise it. I have permissions to use the copywritten information on the national website . Must I quote the material Cite it in a specific format? Your input is appreciated

Regards Ivan Enriquez (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:40, 30 July 2010 (UTC).

Highroad No. 28

Dear C.Fred The page "Highroad No. 28" was deleted on the basis of being (A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)

The band are well know in Australia, in particularly Sydney and Melbourne, and have released 4 CD's, 2 of which received international distribution Additionally, they have toured many parts of Australia and have a solid fan base.

Please advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrno28 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Dearest Fred,

I understand and I will update the page with additional independent sources.

Warm regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrno28 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Highroad No. 28 page redone

Hi Fred, I have just redone the Highroad No. 28 page again, this time including many more external links and details. Please let me know if their are any problems. I certainly have no problems getting more links to verify the bands authenticity and notability within Australia. Warm regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrno28 (talk • contribs) 05:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi again

Fred, I received another deletion notice. I believe the page fits all criteria- please let me know what the problem is and I will certainly rectify ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrno28 (talk • contribs) 05:30, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Free Images

Hi, a question again about Free Images. What makes something a free image? Is something from Getty Images free? I have an image for the Eddie Barlow page and want to know if I can use it. Thanks Welshman25 (talk) 17:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

User talk:LMGHS Webmaster

I have unblocked this user, after receiving the email that he sent to OTRS. Everything in that department looks to be on the up and up. I would very much appreciate it if you could continue to help him with his other issues with editing the article. Thank you, NW (Talk) 15:56, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

RE: Rudy Gay Clause

Now that you’ve done your due diligence instead of blindly taking a secondary source verbatim, we can discuss the real matter.

1.) Your secondary source calling the NCAA ruling “The Rudy Gay Clause” is not even noted by an author: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2005/jan/09/20050109-125720-7898r/

The credentials of the writer are incapable of being ascertained.

2.) Apparently you aren’t a college sports fan. The source, while not specifying an author, is The Washington Times. Gary Williams of the Maryland Terrapins had a gripe against Rudy Gay for choosing Uconn over Maryland, and made his feelings know publicly concerning the recruitment process. College Park, Maryland (home of the Maryland Terrapins) is 15 minutes from the actual, physical, location of The Washington Post. Are you seeing where the local bias comes into play? Then it should come as no surprise that a source noted from The Washington Post would take creative license in an attempt to bash the former recruit that scorned his/her (gender is optional seeing as though no source is noted) team. Just because a bitter Maryland fan decides to adopt the term does not make this factual information. Rudy Gay has no clause for which he was named. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.160.91 (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

First, verbatim quote from the story: "The NCAA has adopted the 'Rudy Gay' clause when it comes to scheduling November exhibitions." Second, the byline is the Associated Press; it's probably not a writer from the Post, much less one from the Times, who wrote the story. Even if it were, it's been reviewed and vetted not just by a local editor's desk, but by the national wire service desk. The source is reliable and neutral, end of story. —C.Fred (talk) 18:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Highroad No. 28- more citations added. Please let me know anymore needed.

Dear Fred, I have added extensive citations to the Highroad No. 28 page to conform to the expectations of Wiki.

You stated "None of your assertions about the band that you made on my talk page (international touring, multiple major-label albums) were present in the article text"

On the Wiki page I never made any assertions that the band were internationally touring, or had multiple major-label albums. The albums were released via independent label(s) DSM99 Records. Distribution of the albums are by WJO Distribution. They are additional labels and distributors I added their, with citations present.

All the citations (apart from the Myspace and Facebook ones- and they are external refernces) are from independent sources.

Can you please let me know if anymore needs to be done, because I cannot see how the page does not conform to Wikis standards. Many Thanks, Warm regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrno28 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Bobby Brackins

This guy has a song on the Hot 100. Isn't that enough to be significant? Please undelete and I can add that line. Djbob (talk) 21:35, 3 August 2010 (UTC)