Talk:Clipper (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:02, 22 October 2010

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: #section links are case-sensitive on most browsers

Links from this article with broken #section links :
[[Macro (computer science)#Macro languages|macros]]

You can remove this template after fixing the problems | FAQ | Report a problem

Uniqueness

The article is slightly misleading about code blocks. It calls them "unique" when they're not really. One only has to look at `lambda' from the Lisp world to see this.

I agree and I removed the word from the text. Maybe they are unique if compared to xBase. EmilioSilva 23:58, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Still active?

"As of 2005, the Clipper language is being actively implemented, and extended"

Many are NOT using clipper but are migrating to other languages, meaning it is not actively implemented. Any comments? or should i remove this? 59.93.129.26 10:28, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. Clipper is still the cornerstone of my company's product suite, and comp.lang.clipper is quite active indicating that it is still in active use worldwide.
Wyomingaires 22:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I used to use clipper and purchased Visual Objects but I did not get into using it because it did not become popular.

Gregorydavid 07:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not Used??? SAGE-SP products Contaplus and Facturaplus, leaders in spanish merchants (Spain and many sudamerican countries) are make wit clipper 5.2 + FiveWin library. --Museo8bits 16:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO, yes it is still active since I was consulting for a customer still having a Clipper-driver dBase III application in 2004 ; not that far away in the past ;-)

Regards User:Hefiz

General purpose?

Isn't Clipper more suited to the same niche of purpose of COBOL?

That would rather depend on what you think the "niche" of COBOL is. I can't say I've ever noticed that Clipper has a real "niche" as such -- I've seen it used to develop all sorts of applications. davep 09:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

configuration imprimante —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.200.4.148 (talk) 07:26, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sharing a dbase ii rd plus file

in programme how can i share a dbase iii rd plus file —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.117.220 (talk) 06:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

definition

Clipper is not a programming language IMHO. It was, and still is, a dBase language "compiler" with extensions (the so-called Clipper libraries). A paraggraph could also be added about the Ashton-Tate answer to the widely-spread out Summer87 version (operating on dBase III+ if I remember correctly) : dBase IV, which was also "compiled" and led to many porting projects (including one I made in 1990).

As far as I remember, Clipper was nevcer considered as a language per se ; it was considered an extension to dBase III.

just my 0.02$ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.243.20.181 (talk) 07:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 :Not Used??? [[SAGE]]-SP products Contaplus and Facturaplus, leaders in spanish merchants (Spain and many sudamerican countries) are make wit clipper 5.2 + FiveWin library. --[[User:Museo8bits|Museo8bits]] 16:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
+:: IMHO, yes it is still active since I was consulting for a customer still having a Clipper-driver dBase III application in 2004 ; not that far away in the past ;-)
+Regards [[User:Hefiz]]
 == General purpose? ==