Talk:RJ TextEd: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:50, 6 November 2010

Author of RJ TextEd allowed me to create an article on wikipedia proof link - http://www.rjsoftware.se/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=4843&sid=8f1e1883d49e7a028715a97b96154c4f#4843

There is no explicit release of the text under a free license. Furthermore, Wikipedia is not a place to advertise or promote a product. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 15:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But wikipedia has a lot of articles about the text editor (PSPad, Notepad, AkelPad and others)? What is this convenient and freeware editor is worse? Is RJ TextEd not entitled to become a well-known (and therefore better because of the emergence of new users) because of Wikipedia? --User:Se7h (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:49, 6 November 2010 edit Se7h (talk \| contribs) 101 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:50, 6 November 2010 edit undo Se7h (talk \| contribs) 101 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:


	But wikipedia has a lot of articles about the text editor (PSPad, Notepad, AkelPad and others)? What is this convenient and freeware editor is worse? Is RJ TextEd not entitled to become a well-known (and therefore better because of the emergence of new users) because of Wikipedia? --[[User:~~Se7h\|~~Se7h]] ([[User talk:Se7h\|talk]]) 15:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)		But wikipedia has a lot of articles about the text editor (PSPad, Notepad, AkelPad and others)? What is this convenient and freeware editor is worse? Is RJ TextEd not entitled to become a well-known (and therefore better because of the emergence of new users) because of Wikipedia? --[[User:Se7h]] ([[User talk:Se7h\|talk]]) 15:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)