Jump to content

Talk:Vaishnavism: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
m Talk page general fixes & other cleanup using AWB (9417)
Rig Veda extract: new section
Line 29: Line 29:


Jose Ignacio Lopez <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Joseignaciolopez|Joseignaciolopez]] ([[User talk:Joseignaciolopez|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Joseignaciolopez|contribs]]) 20:08, 27 June 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Jose Ignacio Lopez <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Joseignaciolopez|Joseignaciolopez]] ([[User talk:Joseignaciolopez|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Joseignaciolopez|contribs]]) 20:08, 27 June 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Rig Veda extract ==

Does the quote from the Rig Veda really belong in the lead? Is this actually the generally accepted translation and interpretation? [[Special:Contributions/70.75.233.253|70.75.233.253]] ([[User talk:70.75.233.253|talk]]) 18:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:22, 2 October 2013

delete

i think the krishna section in this article and others should be removed or supply an reliable refrence —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.228.179.171 (talk) 12:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Swayam Bhagavan uner Principal historic branches

Should red letter page Swayam Bhagavan listed here, be Svayam Bhagavan?

This is not an article on Vaishnavism. It is about the sectarian perception by a contemporary organization (ISKCON) of Vaishnavism. It should appropiately be referred as an article on ISKCON (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Society_for_Krishna_Consciousness) and its particular dogmas and phylosophycal positions. I am new to wikipedia so I do not know how exactly the process goes to review these articles to help improve their neutrality. Does someone review tha information? Who finally decides what stays and what goes? Saludos

Jose Ignacio Lopez — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseignaciolopez (talkcontribs) 20:08, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rig Veda extract

Does the quote from the Rig Veda really belong in the lead? Is this actually the generally accepted translation and interpretation? 70.75.233.253 (talk) 18:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]