User talk:Mabelina

January 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for exhausting the community's patience, see this ANI discussion. After nine time-limited blocks by six different admins in less than a year, I see no other recourse than indef. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 08:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Note that if Bishonen had not blocked you, then I would have done so per no legal threats and your comments here Guy (Help!) 11:30, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Retired hurt

• @Miesianiacal: booted out for engaging in an MOS Discussion. No worries, too much jibber jabber, not enough attention to facts. So long and good luck.*
  @Bishonen and JzG/help:

Correction sub MOS (yet to be made)

• Matthew Festing (image caption) - accuracy is (or would be) better - the sort of issue which caused my fall out with the avant-garde within the Wikipedia community).
  PS. also unfortunately see Rhodes Must Fall (which doesn't look like doing so - in other words, how long does it have to go before a proper non-tree hugging radical socialist POV is put forward without of course getting totally blocked from Wiki).

Mabelina is / is not persona non grata

• It is dismaying that those who have achieved my downfall (without Wikipedia:Dispute resolution) are so immune from sanction themselves: Wikipedia:NOTHERE; unlike User:Anglicanus, User:Softlavender, User:Therequiembellishere etc (who are sensible enough not to raise their heads above the parapet at inopportune times).
  • Those apparatchiks campaigning to block me, probably care less about Wikipedia's accuracy of content (than driving through a politically-motivated Manual of Style), so who does one go to (when ex-communicated)..?