Talk:Guilty Gear Xrd: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:57, 25 May 2016

Video games Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Red Alert (video game) (2 participants)
Zero Hour (video game) (2 participants)
Drawn to Life (video game series) (1 participant)
Playmox (4 participants)
Chef RPG (1 participant)
Outfolded (4 participants)
NoFrag (2 participants)
VoxelStorm (1 participant)
GameRevolution (5 participants)
List of longest-running video game franchises (11 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (10 participants; relisted)
Gilman Louie (3 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (5 participants; relisted)
Emote (4 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

"-SIGN-"?

Most of the media has been consistently referring to the game as "Guilty Gear Xrd -SIGN-", "Guilty Gear Xrd: Sign", and other, similar variations. Any thoughts on whether or not and how the subtitle should be incorporated into the article or the title?

When localizated for US/Europe, it will happen propably the same that happened to the first game (that lost The Missing Link). It's better to wait. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 01:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Release date

Daisuke (in an E3 interview) has said that it comes out Holiday 2014 and not fall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.46.187.91 (talk) 22:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source please. TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 02:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source here in a gamespot interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usBU_mJmhuw

around 8:42 seconds — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.46.187.91 (talk) 16:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Controls

yo I'm just saying the Destructoid review is entirely wrong about the controls
http://www.ggxrd.com/ac/system/
game uses a 5-button layout in arcades and the console version has about 3 or 4 extra buttons mapped to macros of various button combinations
ALL five of those buttons are attacks: punch, kick, slash, heavy slash, and dust
airdashes are not performed with a button.
throws are performed with the heavy slash button.
they're half-right about a button being used for cancels...a button macro set to hit 3 buttons (usually punch kick slash) performs a roman cancel.
burst only fills tension if used when not blocking or getting hit

seriously, can we get people who actually play the game to write the gameplay sections for these articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.101.24.127 (talk) 15:59, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So do we need to call guys from Dustloop.com for this?--Gleb95 (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Article for Revelator?

I don’t collaborate on Wikipedia as often as I used to, but I still wanted to raise the question: would it be worthwhile to make a new article for Revelator? So that it can have its own story, review and development sections? Similar to how to the Blazblue games are. Or will it be incorporated in a “updated versions” article similar to GGXX? Thoughts? Jotamide (talk) 20:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's something to think about. We just need to see how Arc will handle it; I mean, if it has a separate story and a different gameplay it's a good reason to split. If the differences are just small things we can do like the "updated versions". Then we need to see if it will pass WP:N, and of course we need someone willing to create it. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:22, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd support a separate article, but if that can't happen then doing something like what was done for XX is perfectly acceptable. TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 23:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 I don’t collaborate on Wikipedia as often as I used to, but I still wanted to raise the question: would it be worthwhile to make a new article for Revelator? So that it can have its own story, review and development sections? Similar to how to the Blazblue games are. Or will it be incorporated in a “updated versions” article similar to GGXX? Thoughts? [[User:Jotamide|Jotamide]] ([[User talk:Jotamide|talk]]) 20:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 :Well, it's something to think about. We just need to see how Arc will handle it; I mean, if it has a separate story and a different gameplay it's a good reason to split. If the differences are just small things we can do like the "updated versions". Then we need to see if it will pass [[WP:N]], and of course we need someone willing to create it. [[User:Gabriel Yuji|Gabriel Yuji]] ([[User talk:Gabriel Yuji|talk]]) 22:22, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
+::I'd support a separate article, but if that can't happen then doing something like what was done for XX is perfectly acceptable. '''[[User:The Stick Man|<span style="color:blue">TheStickMan</span>]]'''[[User talk:The Stick Man|<span style="color:blue"><sup>[✆Talk]</sup></span>]] 23:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)