Talk:Superfish: Difference between revisions
Ratstail91 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
I don't know if anyone cares, but I just spotted superfish.com in godaddy's domain auctions. It's a high four figures, but I'd grab it if I had the cash :/ |
I don't know if anyone cares, but I just spotted superfish.com in godaddy's domain auctions. It's a high four figures, but I'd grab it if I had the cash :/ |
||
[[User:Ratstail91|Ratstail91]] ([[User talk:Ratstail91|talk]]) 16:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC) |
[[User:Ratstail91|Ratstail91]] ([[User talk:Ratstail91|talk]]) 16:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Rename to JustVisual? == |
|||
Since the company name is now JustVisual, shouldn't this page be renamed too (with Superfish redirecting to JustVisual). |
|||
[[User:Kevink707|Kevink707]] ([[User talk:Kevink707|talk]]) 16:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:02, 28 November 2018
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Mention of Lenovo laptop controversy in lede
I added a mention of this issue to the lede for this article. Most people will have come to this article for this reason, and it is therefore important to have that early in the article. User:Sceptre reverted that part of my edit (also adding a fuller text in the History section) describing my text as "weasel words". I am going to mostly-undo that deletion. I will leave out "It is mostly known" which seems to be the problematic text. Ijackson (talk) 15:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Removal of "Rootkit" in reference section
However much I disagree with the methods employed by SuperFish - and I really do disagree with them - it is factually incorrect to describe them as rootkits. A root certificate authority and SSL MITM do not mean a rootkit was installed and I can find no evidence to back up such a descrption. As a result I've removed this entry in the reference section. AD (talk) 19:00, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
The missing word: Malware
Everything I've read about this program uses the word Malware. Why don't we? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 19:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Add a semi-protection?
Can there be a semi-protection added to this page? This is an ongoing event with Lenovo and vandalism could likely occur. ThanksPolloloco51 (talk) 03:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Not likely to happen. It's not good to semi protect because there might be vandalism. Not until there is, and I don't see any in the history. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:53, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- There was one instance, actually. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Superfish&oldid=648284557 Bruiserid (talk) 04:37, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- It takes more than one to justify semi-protection. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks, I'm aware of that. Merely pointing out the one you'd missed -- Bruiserid (talk) 16:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- It takes more than one to justify semi-protection. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- There was one instance, actually. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Superfish&oldid=648284557 Bruiserid (talk) 04:37, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Where has it gone?
As of now, the official website in the beginning of the page is a dead link. 94.176.102.31 (talk) 19:20, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
It sounds a bit like advertising...
--93.70.184.40 (talk) 02:07, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Advertising for what exactly? The article calls it malware like 10 times. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:36, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Domain Name
I don't know if anyone cares, but I just spotted superfish.com in godaddy's domain auctions. It's a high four figures, but I'd grab it if I had the cash :/ Ratstail91 (talk) 16:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Rename to JustVisual?
Since the company name is now JustVisual, shouldn't this page be renamed too (with Superfish redirecting to JustVisual). Kevink707 (talk) 16:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- C-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Computer Security articles
- High-importance Computer Security articles
- C-Class Computer Security articles of High-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- High-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Computer Security articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- C-Class software articles
- Mid-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Mid-importance
- All Software articles
- C-Class Websites articles
- High-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of High-importance
- All Websites articles
- C-Class Internet articles
- Mid-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles