Jump to content

Talk:2014 Winter Olympics: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Reverted good faith edits by Nhatminh01: Removing GAN made against process by editor who has not made significant contributions to article nor inquired of main contributors as to the article's readiness to be a GA. (TW)
Od Mishehu (talk | contribs)
107,223 edits
m Top 25
Line 13: Line 13:
{{WikiProject LGBT studies|class=b}}}}
{{WikiProject LGBT studies|class=b}}}}
{{ITN talk|8 February|2014}}
{{ITN talk|8 February|2014}}
{{top 25 report
| January 19, 2014
| February 2, 2014 | until | February 23, 2014
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

Revision as of 01:42, 4 June 2019

Template:Findsourcesnotice

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2014 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Medal table

Russia has problems with doping so several of the medaills will be stripped . A warning is needed close to the table, not in the last section.Xx236 (talk) 06:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2014 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2014 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2014 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

If you want to provide facts not opinions, than why this edit returns to the lead mere Zhurova opinion? I also agree with you, that if we want a neutral lead, IOC's assessment of the doping programme should be moved. However, I disagree with you that the evaluation can not be included, it is there to balance all those concerns, which in the lead are included. These are evaluation of journalists, which are very related to the article and to this whole paragraph. Also, if we are going to include independent McLaren Report commissioned by the WADA, we should also mention conclusion of the whole accusation (13 Olympic medals stripped).Jirka.h23 (talk) 10:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think that all these doping cases is a complete mess now. IOC intends to appeal the CAS decision, and it's just not clear what's going to happen. We shall wait until they finally decide who won these medals. Speaking of the pre-games concerns and controversies, I think they're not a major part of the games. We can keep them but I really don't think that we need to draw a conclusion in the end based on what Thomas Bach (IOC President) and the CSM had said right after the games. Or we need to specify that the games were seen successful from an organizational standpoint only. But again, better not to mention these controversies and not to draw a conclusion. We unanimously decided to remove the IOC's evaluation of the doping program (worst attack on an integrity of the Olympics in history), then why Thomas Bach's comments dating back to 2014 should be in the lead? By the way, I don't see any evaluations in the 2016 Rio Olympics article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djdisiwk78 (talk • contribs)
Can we please stop with the whitewashing here? Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view, and the lead must summarize all key points of the article. Doping, the LGBT issues, and maybe the cost overruns, were a prominent storyline of these games. ViperSnake151  Talk  18:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2014_Winter_Olympics&oldid=900193151"