Jump to content

User talk:Cassiopeia: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message
Tag: wikilove
m removing an oops repetition
Line 146: Line 146:


Hi there! I see you have some free slots for users who want to become Anti-Vandalism trainees. Are you willing to take me under as a trainee? [[User:PraiseVivec|PraiseVivec]] ([[User talk:PraiseVivec|talk]]) 12:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there! I see you have some free slots for users who want to become Anti-Vandalism trainees. Are you willing to take me under as a trainee? [[User:PraiseVivec|PraiseVivec]] ([[User talk:PraiseVivec|talk]]) 12:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Kindness Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for all the suggestions towards improving [[Divya Dwivedi]] . You are very generous. [[User:Speculative Boting|Speculative Boting]] ([[User talk:Speculative Boting|talk]]) 13:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
|}


== A barnstar for you! ==
== A barnstar for you! ==

Revision as of 13:41, 11 September 2019


Where to write about current events

The current events portal is used to describe current world-wide events of note, not just in politics, but also in science, culture, technology, sports, entertainment and many other areas. The information in question should be added to any relevant articles as well. However, Wikipedia does not offer first-hand news reports on breaking stories (use Wikinews for that). Instead, the in the news section on our Main Page mentions and links to entries of timely interest that are (and this is crucial) nonetheless encyclopedia articles that have been updated to reflect an important current event. Non-Administrators can suggest items or changes to this Main Page section by editing the candidates page, from which administrators will update the live template from time to time.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

deletion of my creation - Draft:Delete humanity

greetings i am the creater of the delete humanity or delete humanity draft whatever it is called. And it has shown that you were the one who deleted it and got it in decline and i was going to say,that i think it shouldnt be deleted just because delete humanity is a big powerful group literally the group delete humanity one person the leader himself can hack the NASA even an delete humanity jr person someone Ina lower group of that one group can hack the NASA and plus with them sending iploggers everywhere they can be more dangerous then the group called anonymous. And delete humanity is so powerful that the group teaming up with the jrs can possibly defeat the whole anonymous group. so i think this should spread out everywhere on the internet. If you have nothing to do with this i am sorry for the confusion and have a good day. Joe mighty 679 (talk) 00:02, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe mighty 679 Greeting. Pls see your Draft:Delete humanity has been deleted due to the nature of the content is promotional - see HERE. To have a page in Wikipedia, the subject needs to be notable and the content claimed need to support by significant coverage from independent, reliable sources where by the sources talk directly about the subject in length and in dept. In addition, the content need to be written in a neutral point of view free of copyright infringement and WP:PROMOTION. Pls read WP:Your First Article. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:06, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
so basically i can`t post the delete humanity creation i have made that has been declined can`t be posted her on Wikipedia for promotional? If that is the case than is there any way to fix it for the delete humanity creation to be on Wikipedia? If so not then you know maybe a website i can recreate the Draft:Delete humanity Joe mighty 679 (talk) 15:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Joe mighty 679, Wikipedia is an WP:Encyclopedia and not a social or promotional sites for such no promotional articles would be allowed in Wikipedia. I have listed the requirements on my previous message to you on the reimbursements needed for an article to be acceptable in Wikipedia - or you could read Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything.Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:15, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
understood, Thank you for your help.Joe mighty 679 (talk) 14:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and request to advise

Thanks very much for the intervention on the draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Divya_Dwivedi. The subject is a politically sensitive and developing topic. Thank you for removing the ip edits which seem to be vandalism. But there was another ip edit which you did not remove in the section titled Criticisms. Is that because it provided a link to an article published by the subject in The Wire? However this ip edit in any way does not connect that article to the whole draft Divya Dwivedi. Should I let it remain as it is? Or if you think that ip edit in Criticisms is unnecessary please remove it or find a way to place it in the context of the article. Do advise me in this situtation. Bonsoir! Speculative Boting (talk) 15:27, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Speculative Boting Greetings. I believe the edit you mentioned above is THIS ONE. Is was a vandalism edit as the IP editor remove the source without reasonable explanation/reason for such you would add it back. Do note all articles in Wikipedia can be edited by anyone (IP or registered users); except if the articles are protected and certain editors could not able to make edits due to enormous destructive edits / edit warring on the page until the protection is lifted. Side note - for a subject to be accepted in Wikipedia, the subject need to be notable - pls read Wikipedia:Notability (academics) and secondly the content claimed need to be supported by significant coverage of independent, reliable sources - see WP:IS and WP:RS, written in neutral point of view, free of copyright infringement (write the article in your own words and WP:PROMOTION. Sources written by the subject, associate with the subjects, interviews and etc can NOT be used to demonstrate the notability requirements for the sources are not reliable/independent. What we need is what other independent, reliable sources say about the subject. To me the Draft:Divya Dwivedi seems lean a little toward promotional tone instead of strictly written like an encyclopedia content (Note : Wikipedia is an WP:Encyclopedia). You would have a look at the List of political philosophers and take a look at Ayn Rand and Jean-Paul Sartre how the content and article format/structure as the reference. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Salut CASSIOPEIA! Thank you for clarity! The edit I mentioned is this one which cannot be seen in history, at the beginning of Criticisms section, "Divya Dwivedi is anti Hindu nationalism. She opposed Hindus. Dwivedi wrote praising article about anti Hindu Romila Thapar here https://thewire.in/history/romila-thapar-jnu-indian-history Dwivedi Wikipedia should be stopped." I have not removed it.
I understand the requirements for notability for the subject and I think there is substantial coverage in reliable sources such Libération, Mediapart, The Hindu, UNESCO, and The Indian Express. Some of the subjects who have written on Divya Dwivedi are eminent practitioners of their field which is shown by their wiki pages such Jean-Luc Nancy, Robert Bernasconi, Barbara Cassin and Tridip Suhrud. Of course I can be wrong!
I see the point that it appears promotional. This is where I have a hard time, because I am merely paraphrasing what was said about the subject by the noted practitioners such as Jean-Luc Nancy. I found the criticial remarks and added them too in a section called criticisms. In fact it will be much appreciated if you can help to change the tone of the article. Please consider editing it? Bonjour! Speculative Boting (talk) 06:20, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Speculative Boting Do write the content in neutral point of view in simple, straight, plain fashion and not in essay style format (remove has been xxxxed) if possible). Look at the list I mentioned above and see how other articles are written which will give you some idea. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hey CASSIOPEIA, thou art very cool! I made the edits to change the tone in the way that I could get the gist of your advice and shortened the draft. On that front I found another article on the subject published in Deccan Chronicle and added that. If you can tell me how this looks now and suggest more changes I will keep at it. Cheers! Speculative Boting (talk) 12:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Armenian alphabet letter articles BEING MOVED TO DRAFTS

Please!!! Why are you putting my Armenian letter articles into DRAFTS?! Why can the Russian version, which it was based ON, even if they ARE SHORT, avoid being DRAFTED?! Please! PLEASE! DO NOT PUT MY ARTICLES INTO DRAFTS!!!!! THESE ARE NOT ACTS OF COPY-AND-PASTE OR EVEN VANDALISM!!!! HELP ME!!!!FIGHTERSOVIET wpedia (talk) 11:11, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FIGHTERSOVIET wpedia, greetings. You articles were moved to draft page because it is not in acceptable state for the are no independent, reliable sources to support the content claimed which you would notice if you read the messages on your articles. We the reviewers could move the new page to draft space when there are no sources to be found in the article.. Pls read the requirements for a page to be accepted in the mainspace - WP:Your First Article and Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Cassiopeia; I have marked the article "SE (LETTER)" with Db-g7. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FIGHTERSOVIET wpedia (talkcontribs) 01:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong

First of all, there is no difference between the current page and the one after my edit (I'm guessing someone re-edited your correction of my edit). Second, the technical term for the submission I edited is a Ninja choke. There is no other name for it.216.246.242.149 (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 216.246.242.149 Good day. The "method" of the fight card is as per Sherdog.com based on Wikipedia WP:MMA guidelines - see here which it states "submission (guillotine choke), so pls do not change the method as per your judgement. Do note Wikipedia is all about verification and not the true. If the source is incorrect, we will change the info when the source corrected itself. thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk)
Roger that. Sorry for the inconvenience. Is the fact that I can provide video evidence of what a ninja choke is, which would prove that that's the technique that was used, relevant in any way? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.246.242.149 (talk) 18:50, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi 216.246.242.149, It is not about a video demonstrate the submission, but the report of the method of "that specific bout" of the evet. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 19:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I note that you've moved List of German national football players into draft space. Do you think it would be appropriate for Germany national football team results to also be moved, an article created by the same editor in similar manner? Thanks. Onetwothreeip (talk) 01:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Onetwothreeip, Greetings. List of German national football players was moved to draft because there was no sources provided. Germany national football team results has been nominated to be merged to Germany national football team results (2000–present) article - so let the discussion runs. cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There hasn't been any suggestion to merge the article, only to move some content from that article into another article. There has also been no discussion of that suggestion. Onetwothreeip (talk) 08:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Onetwothreeip, There is a suggested merge tag atop of the Germany national football team results page. Do fell free to comment on the discussion link. The article could be accepted, merged, redirected or AfDed, but not advisable to moved it to draft space as the article does have sources. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They appear to be mistaken in thinking what they are suggesting is a merge proposal. Not sure why a merge tag was placed there. Onetwothreeip (talk) 09:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Onetwothreeip, If you think it is a mistake then remove the tag if you wish. thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:52, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #381

Counter-Vandalism Academy

Hi there! I see you have some free slots for users who want to become Anti-Vandalism trainees. Are you willing to take me under as a trainee? PraiseVivec (talk) 12:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for all the suggestions towards improving Divya Dwivedi . You are very generous. Speculative Boting (talk) 13:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]