Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fur-Piled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:08, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fur-Piled

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sources. Precedent is that Ursa Major awards do not confer notability, and without that, there's literally no notability per WP:WEB. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:55, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree with the nom here. For a notable webcomic, then the sorts of sources likely to allow notability to be established ought to be online. If they are, I can't find them. Google results deteriorate into trivial mentions, forum posts and blogs pretty quickly. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 16:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Ursa Major Award is not an indicator of notability because the award itself does not meet notability requirements. I cannot find sources which would indicate the comic's notability. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't look like there are any secondary sources. In other news, today I learned that "WikiFur" exists. The content will presumably live on there. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 07:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.