Jump to content

User talk:MTanveer512

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MTanveer512 (talk | contribs) at 16:03, 1 April 2024 (April 2024: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hi MTanveer512! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Information icon

Hello MTanveer512. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MTanveer512. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MTanveer512|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. This is regarding ACE Money Transfer. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not getting paid anything against this article!
I have nothing to do with the company. It's just an informative article that I've written personally. If this article goes successful, I'll be writing more articles about other helpful services that the general public may benefit from, and not the companies or organizations. Please let me know if I need to do anything further to get the article published. MTanveer512 (talk) 12:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You sure about that? What if I said that LinkedIn shows an M. Tanveer working for ACE Money Transfer - are you telling me that's just a coincidence? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Muhammad Tanveer or M Tanveer is just a common name. So, it's definitely a coincidence since I haven't made my LinkedIn account ever. You may call it my personal preference that I have paid more time and effort in learning and acquiring specific skillsets. I am looking forward to creating my LinkedIn and social media accounts once I start growing as a writer. MTanveer512 (talk) 12:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let me ask a slightly different question, then. You registered your Wikipedia user account today, and as your very first edit you created a fully-fledged draft at User:MTanveer512/sandbox, complete with wikitables etc. advanced formatting. This is quite unusual for a brand new user. Have you edited before under a different account? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I have been extremely careful in this regard. I have been learning and working on this for over two months now. I read Wiki Articles and watched tutorials from other experts, and then I kept writing and editing the draft in Google Docs side by side. It was today when I eventually felt confident to give it a proper try and upload the draft for review.
You know, when I started drafting it here today, it was feeling so strange because it is definitely quite unique to draft an article on Wikipedia than Google Docs. But, with testing every feature in the formatting toolbar on top of the editor, I finally made it. I am not sure if I have done it perfectly right, but I feel that I have somehow created a reasonable article. MTanveer512 (talk) 12:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see.
You didn't actually answer my question – have you edited previously under a different user account?
And one more thing: how did you pick this subject as your first one? So far 100% of your edits are about ACE Money Transfer. I'm guessing there's a reason for that? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think I couldn't aptly explain to you against your question. Let me explain it here again!
1 - I didn't edit anything previously on Wikipedia. It is my first attempt here. The reason why I swiftly did it is simple that I have constantly been preparing for this for over 2 months.
2 - This is a complete article about a fintech company named ACE Money Transfer. I want to write about fintech companies and when I searched in this context, I found most of the companies' articles live on Wikipedia already. So, I am now trying to write only on the topics, which aren't found here. This article about the company ACE Money Transfer is my first attempt. After this, I'll be finding another name not present on Wikipedia.
Was I able to respond to you properly now? If not, please let me know and I'll be happy to respond to you, learn from you, and follow every guideline so I could be successful in article publishing here. MTanveer512 (talk) 14:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you have answered my questions, thank you. I just find it difficult to believe your answers. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I regret if I have created any inconvenience for you. I extend apologies for that along with my positive intention to cooperate and abide by your SOPs and policies. Since, it's my first real attempt, I definitely have to learn a lot more than what I acquired for the past two months.
I am eager to know the next step in going live with my article. Please help and guide me. MTanveer512 (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]