Jump to content

A Blonde Woman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Dimadick (talk | contribs) at 14:46, 23 May 2024 (→External links). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

A Blonde Woman (Flora)

A Blonde Woman, also called Flora, is an oil painting by Palma Vecchio, dated today to around 1520, but undocumented before 1870, in the collection of the National Gallery, London.

This half-length depiction of a woman in loosened white chemise with a dark green mantle, holding some flowers, has been interpreted as an idealised representation of female beauty (sometimes in connection with the Roman goddess Flora), and as an actual portrait of either a gentlewoman or a courtesan.

Description

[edit]

The picture was painted in oils on a wood panel measuring 77.5 cm by 64.1 cm (2 ft 6½ in by 2 ft 3¾ in); a strip 2.54 cm (1 in) high has been added along the top of the panel, lengthening it.[1] It is in very good condition, with most of the repainting concentrated in the side of the face and hair which is cast in shadow.[2]

The subject is a young woman with fair skin and blonde carefully tended silken hair sweeping about her shoulders, who shows much décolletée; her white chemise or camicia is unfastened and slipping off her shoulder, baring her right breast and nipple, and there is a little piece of narrow blue ribbon, designed to fasten the chemise. In her right hand is a small bunch of colourful spring flowers.[1][3][4]

Date

[edit]
Venus and Cupid in a Landscape, c. 1522–3

By comparing Palma's treatment of the girl's coiffure with similar styles in pictures by contemporary Venetian artists, such as Lorenzo Lotto, the picture has been dated to about 1520.[5] Richter (1910) thinks the picture representative of Palma's work during the previous decade, from 1510 to 1520, and allied in composition with the "beautiful series of portraits" now preserved in the Gallery of Vienna.[6] The work has been compared to Palma's Sibyl, which is also dated to the 1520s.[7] In Palma's Venus and Cupid in a Landscape, dated by the Fitzwilliam Museum to about 1523 or 1524,[8] Venus has the same dimpled chin, and other facial features, as the girl in this painting.[9]

Analysis

[edit]

Palma Vecchio is known mainly for religious scenes and portraits of women, and Gould (1975) thinks this example of the latter group characteristic of his style.[10][11] The subject is a young woman of that "opulent voluptuous type" which was much admired in Venice at the beginning of the sixteenth century, and was represented in works by Titian, Palma, Lorenzo Lotto, Bonifazio Veronese, Paris Bordone, and others.[1][12] The character of these works is disputed, as to whether the women represented are simply ideals of female beauty created by the artist, or portraits of actually existing beauties, and, if portraits, of whom.[12][13][14]

Titian's Flora, c. 1515 (Uffizi)

In the National Gallery catalogues, this picture was formerly titled Flora, after the ancient Roman goddess of spring and flowers.[2][15] Certain particularities of the composition, such as the small posy of forget-me-nots, buttercups (or wall-flowers) and primroses held in the subject's right hand, and the erotic suggestion of the loosened chemise, have drawn comparison with Titian's earlier painting of the same name.[2][15] Richter writes of the "cold whiteness" of the chemise which has fallen away from the shoulders, "like the discarded sheath of an opening flower".[16] Gould thinks the influence of Titian likely, though unprovable given the dearth of primary sources for the picture.[2]

The identity of the sitter is unknown, and according to Gould impossible to determine given the "summary treatment of the features".[2] Richter, conversely, describes Palma's "carefully individualised heads" of women as portraits.[17] Palma painted a number of similar half-lengths of (real or ideal) beauties, and the type became one of his specialities.[11] Such eroticised images, never intended for public exhibition, were by a clientele of wealthy male collectors and hung in private apartments.[18][9] There is also evidence that some successful courtesans and mistresses bought and owned alluring portraits of themselves to advertise their charms.[9] Portraits of such well-known women were ordered by their lovers and admirers, who were sometimes even pictured with them.[a][17]

Titian's Penitent Magdalene, c. 1531 (Palazzo Pitti)

Phillips (1897) writes of "the exquisite, golden blond courtezans—or, if you will, models—who constantly appear and reappear in this period of Venetian art".[19] The connection to prostitution extends to the name Flora, which was an alias of prostitutes in Italy from Roman times.[20][21] Collier-Frick (1987) thinks the girl's long, loose and flowing tresses, typical of this type of picture, an allusion to the iconography of Mary Magdalene, patron saint of prostitutes, whose promiscuous past was symbolised by her luxurious hair;[22] while Mellencamp (1969) sees a classical reference to the hair-down nymphs.[23]

Richter argues that some of Palma's pictures of young women may depict courtesans, but that they may equally often be portraits of great ladies, gentlewomen, and young brides whose husbands were simply proud of their beauty.[b][24][25] Burckhardt (1859) had earlier conjectured that Titian's Flora is shown in her "engagement" gown, but Mellencamp disputes this idea, citing the camicia (a blousy undergarment) and uncovered breast as improbable elements in a Renaissance marriage portrait.[26][22]

Provenance

[edit]
Dr Ludwig Mond, who bequeathed the picture to the British nation in 1909

Palma never signed or dated any of his canvases, and although this one is to-day attributed to him based on the style and handling of the composition, the documentation of the picture is completely lacking before 1870.[2][27] On 30 April 1870 it was auctioned by Christie's as lot 53 of the William Delafield sale, with an attribution to Paris Bordone.[5][28] The picture was bought from a Dr Becci in Florence, who had acquired it some time before in England, and was firmly convinced that it was by Leonardo da Vinci. It had previously belonged to a Mr Delafield.[29] It was acquired by Ludwig Mond in 1889, who, just before his death in 1909, bequeathed it, along with the most of his collection of Old Master pictures, to the National Gallery, pending the death of his widow, Frida Mond, who lived until 1923.[30] In 1924, after settling a legal dispute with the family, the National Gallery acquired the picture (accession number NG3939) through the Mond bequest.[5]

Three copies or versions of the composition have between recorded:

  1. Formerly in the collection of the Duke of Northumberland at Syon House, auctioned by Sotheby's on 26 March 1952 as lot 109.[5][29]
  2. From an anonymous sale, auctioned by Sotheby's on 12 December 1954 as lot 62.[5]
  3. Sold at Cologne in 1904.[5] The sitter is described as wearing pearls.[5][31]

Allusions

[edit]
[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Compare, for example, Laura Dianti, the Woman with a Mirror, by Titian, in the Louvre, and similar pictures by Paris Bordone in the Brera and elsewhere.[17]
  2. ^ Richter therefore titles this picture Portrait of a Lady.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Richter 1910, i. p. 129.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Gould 1987, p. 187.
  3. ^ Richter 1910, i. pp. 133–134.
  4. ^ Kren, et al., eds. 2018, p. 346.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g Gould 1987, p. 188.
  6. ^ Richter 1910, i. p. 130.
  7. ^ Royal Collection Trust.
  8. ^ Fitzwilliam Museum.
  9. ^ a b c National Gallery.
  10. ^ Gould 1987, pp. 184–185.
  11. ^ a b Humfrey 1995, p. 167.
  12. ^ a b Richter 1910, i. p. 133.
  13. ^ Philipps 1905, p. 26.
  14. ^ Humfrey 1995, pp. 167–168.
  15. ^ a b Richter 1910, i. pp. 129–130.
  16. ^ Richter 1910, i. pp. 129, 134.
  17. ^ a b c Richter 1910, i. p. 134.
  18. ^ Richter 1910, i. p. 135.
  19. ^ Phillips 1897, p. 52.
  20. ^ Held 1961, pp. 202–203.
  21. ^ Santore 2008, pp. 20–21.
  22. ^ a b Collier-Frick 1987, p. 40.
  23. ^ Mellenchamp 1969, pp. 175–7.
  24. ^ Richter 1910, i. pp. 133–135.
  25. ^ Burckhardt 1955, iii. p. 249, note 3.
  26. ^ Mellenchamp 1969, pp. 174–7.
  27. ^ Richter 1910, i. p. 131.
  28. ^ Richter 1910, i. p. x.
  29. ^ a b Richter 1910, i. p. 136.
  30. ^ Wardleworth 2003, p. 88.
  31. ^ Spahn 1932, p. 126.
  32. ^ Nabokov 1969, p. 141.
  33. ^ Shapiro 2014, p. 156.

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Posy (detail)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Blonde_Woman&oldid=1225291897"