Jump to content

User talk:ChristineBamtonics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PhilKnight (talk | contribs) at 15:37, 2 December 2024 (comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

November 2024

You can't create a new account if your old account is blocked. That is block evasion and led to this account being blocked. You need to appeal your block at User talk:KryptonicChristine. The admins sound like they are ready to unblock you so don't give them a reason to keep you blocked. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ChristineBamtonics (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

first block was completely unfounded and false saying I was promoting - 2nd was 'sockpuppertry' which was an honest mistake as I thought just the old account was blocked and not the user. I am trying to adhere to the ever-learning curve of wikipedias policies as best i can. Thank you. ChristineBamtonics (talk) 13:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=first block was completely unfounded and false saying I was promoting - 2nd was 'sockpuppertry' which was an honest mistake as I thought just the old account was blocked and not the user. I am trying to adhere to the ever-learning curve of wikipedias policies as best i can. Thank you. [[User:ChristineBamtonics|ChristineBamtonics]] ([[User talk:ChristineBamtonics#top|talk]]) 13:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=first block was completely unfounded and false saying I was promoting - 2nd was 'sockpuppertry' which was an honest mistake as I thought just the old account was blocked and not the user. I am trying to adhere to the ever-learning curve of wikipedias policies as best i can. Thank you. [[User:ChristineBamtonics|ChristineBamtonics]] ([[User talk:ChristineBamtonics#top|talk]]) 13:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=first block was completely unfounded and false saying I was promoting - 2nd was 'sockpuppertry' which was an honest mistake as I thought just the old account was blocked and not the user. I am trying to adhere to the ever-learning curve of wikipedias policies as best i can. Thank you. [[User:ChristineBamtonics|ChristineBamtonics]] ([[User talk:ChristineBamtonics#top|talk]]) 13:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
I don't understand why you are requesting an unblock here, you should be requesting at User talk:KryptonicChristine. PhilKnight (talk) 15:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]