Jump to content

User talk:CFA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Bushranger (talk | contribs) at 01:38, 12 December 2024 (Why can't I move my draft to mainspace?: fix indent). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


👤 User 💬 Talk ✏️ Contributions ✉️ Email me

Next Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Volunteers' Corner will be on December 9

Hi, we remind you that, if you have questions or ideas to discuss about Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia, you can participate to the next Volunteers' Corner, that will be held on December 9, at 15:30 UTC (link to the meeting).

We hope to see you there! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter

Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you no longer want this newsletter, you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist.

Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure nearly everything runs smoothly and on time. Editors in good standing (unblocked and without sanctions) are invited to nominate themselves or another editor to be a Guild coordinator (with their permission, of course) until 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). The voting phase begins at 00:01 on 16 December and runs until 23:59 on 31 December. Questions may be asked of candidates at any stage in the process. Elected coordinators will serve a six-month term from 1 January through 30 June.

Drive: In our September Backlog Elimination Drive, 67 editors signed up, 39 completed at least one copy edit, and between them they edited 682,696 words comprising 507 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Blitz: The October Copy Editing Blitz saw 16 editors sign-up, 15 of whom completed at least one copy edit. They edited 76,776 words comprising 35 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: In our November Backlog Elimination Drive, 432,320 words in 151 articles were copy edited. Of the 54 users who signed up, 33 copy edited at least one article. Barnstars awarded are posted here.

Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 15 December (UTC) and will end on 21 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here.

Progress report: As of 22:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 333 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,401 articles.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking.

To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Message sent by Baffle_gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, CFA, please could you undo the move of the page, as seen with Thewolfchild ?! Many thanks and best regards from France ! Mitchosaure (talk) 23:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. C F A 23:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you ! 😉 Mitchosaure (talk) 23:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from This Video Has 73M Views (23:35, 7 December 2024)

Hello CFA, thanks for mentoring me. I have a question about fixing NPOV violations. I found an NPOV issue on the Gutmann method page. The last paragraph in the article stated unattributed opinions as facts. (There was a citation as the end of the paragraph, but this appeared to only apply to the last claim of the paragraph.) I rewrote the paragraph to be new more neutral, but I couldn't find a source for the opinions, and the topic was bit too far beyond my areas of expertise to properly research. In order to be neutral I ended up resorting to using weasel words with a by whom? tag. In the future how should I fix biased unattributed opinions. --This Video Has 73M Views (talk) 23:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi This Video Has 73M Views. A tag is perfectly fine in this case because it will alert other editors (who may be more equipped) of the issue. If, in the future, you are unable to find a source for something, you can tag it with {{citation needed}} or remove it altogether. You could also use {{disputed inline}} and start a discussion on the talk page, where other interested editors who are watching the page can join in. WP:WIKIVOICE has some advice on this topic — but, yes, normally you should attribute opinions directly to sources (e.g. [source] believes that... [citation]). Let me know if you have any other questions. Happy editing! C F A 23:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Rizzler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Rizzler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rizzler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 23:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2024)

Hello, CFA. The article for improvement of the week is:

Gulf

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Volt • Diurnality


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 9 December 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Request for Adoption

Hi, I'm somewhat new to Wikipedia editing and I've started a few pages of my own. I want to improve the quality of these pages and get them to higher ratings, as well as learning more about the ins and outs of Wikipedia as a whole. Would you be interested? Tylermack999 (talk) 14:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tylermack999. Sure. I've set myself as your mentor. Don't hesitate to leave a message or ping me if you have any questions. Happy editing! C F A 01:39, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-50

MediaWiki message delivery 22:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

William Coulson

Hi CFA, could you take a look at William Coulson? I'm unsure whether the surgeon is the primary topic, given that the entire article is built on a singular reference, but I don't think the mining engineer, military officer and footballer are worthy candidates either. I feel that creating a disambiguation page would be the best option. APM (talk) 18:51, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I move my draft to mainspace?

@CFA: I have a draft that I'm trying to move to mainspace, but I keep getting an error saying "The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid."

Why am I getting this? I know there is a redirect page under the name of my article that redirects to the plane's successor, so maybe that's it? Tylermack999 (talk) 23:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Tylermack999: That was the case - I've gone ahead and moved it for you. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:38, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]