User talk:JBsupreme

EVENTUALISM IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE ROUTE FOR WP:BLP CONCERNS

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: I am switching from scotch to red wine for the month of August. I'm open to suggestions. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 07:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whine suggestion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Call the Waaaambulance that same old someone had a fit again. There is a ton of whining about us going on with his usual supporters chiming in. It is so nice of the same to give us the required courtesy of letting us know, isn't it? Miami33139 (talk) 04:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe time for a cup of tea?

Maybe its time [1]] for a nice cup of tea? Active Banana (talk) 21:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How bout a glass of Scotch? First drink's on me. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 22:05, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bottoms up!

Blocked

you have been blocked from editing for the next 48 hours as apparently some kind of sanction is necessary to show you that this kind of edit summaries [2] [3] are not acceptable - also not against obvious vandals. you have received multiple (more than five) warnings [4] about this and it has had little effect on your behaviour leaving me no other choice than to show that I am being serious. Also the reason for the block is repeated and severe uncivilty - not exactly personal attacks - but it does fall under disruptive behaviour. there just is no blocktemplate for that sepecifically.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

·Maunus·ƛ· 17:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Read a book

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JBsupreme (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made no personal attacks. I do wish vandals would suffer slow, painful, fiery deaths. This is not a personal attack, however, as much as the blocking administrator may wish it were one. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 17:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please cease making comments about other editors/people. Your comments clearly violate Wikipedia spirit, as well as a number of policies (civility for example). I'm fairly sick of seeing these ANI disscussions about whether something is a death threat or death wish, I'm sure you know that neither are acceptable. I think a 48 hour block will do you some good, and I do sincerely hope that when you return you stop making these remarks. Kingpin¹³ (talk) 17:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I hope lots of things. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 17:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]