Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Rossiter
Appearance
- Jordan Rossiter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT still... JMHamo (talk) 03:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 03:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - passes WP:GNG. A Google News search finds over 200 articles, including features articles about him. Nfitz (talk) 13:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - Most of it being routine news coverage JMHamo (talk) 14:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - sure ... most, but not all. And not all of 200 articles is significant enough for GNG. Nfitz (talk) 15:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - Most of it being routine news coverage JMHamo (talk) 14:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - per above, has not played in a fully professional league or senior international football. No significant in depth coverage, just the usual brief coverage of a young player yet to play in a significant match. Fenix down (talk) 17:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC)