Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Appearance
Rollback
Please familiarize yourself with Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback before making a request.Misuse of the feature, even if unintentional or in good faith, may give cause for it to be removed. |
To make a request, please follow the instructions below:
NOTE: It is unlikely that users with fewer than 200 mainspace edits will be granted the use of this tool. Please consider enrolling at the Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy to learn more about handling vandalism.
Requests that do not meet the above criteria will be delayed or removed. |
Sorry, please be aware that unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Administrator notation templates
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This template is used to answer requests for permissions, especially the rollback user right. ::{{subst:RFPR|option}} ~~~~
|
- Supdiop (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have a good understanding of policies of wikipedia and I am currently patrolling new pages and occasionally reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits. I am requesting the rollback right because I want to focus on reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits beside patrolling new pages. Supdiop (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Not done I have been looking over your contribs and your talk page and I do not believe your understanding of Wikipedia policies is solid as you claim. You've made somel deletion nominations that were apparently inappropriate, and you created an article that met multiple speedy deletion criteria as well as not even being in English. Although these are seperate issues from vandalism patrolling, it seems you generally have a very shallow, incomplete understanding of the policies you have been attempting to uphold, which gives me no faith that you would use rollback appropriately. I would suggest getting some experience manually dealing with vandals, and taking advantage of WP:CVU to help you gain an adequate understanding of the correct methods for dealing with vandals. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- JZCL (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I periodically revert vandalism and simply believe that it would be a useful feature to speed up this process. Sometimes I patrol IPs on RecentChanges and would find it useful if I had this feature. JZCL 20:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- ABCDEFAD (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- After being rejected a month ago, I'm back! I would like to use Huggle, as I find that STiki doesn't exactly fit me well. I have over 1,000 edits (yes, I'm not exaggerating), which is WAY more than the required 200 edits. I hope this is enough for Rollback. ABCDEFADtalk to me 21:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 21:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)