Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MusikBot (talk | contribs) at 21:40, 11 May 2015 (Bot clerking, commented on 1 request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

(add requestview requests)

Sorry, please be aware that unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Administrator notation templates

This template is used to answer requests for permissions, especially the rollback user right.

::{{subst:RFPR|option}} ~~~~

The second (unnamed) parameter is optional. It can be omitted or used to specify the admin when marking a request as already done or the number of edits when declining due to inexperience.
Result Code Normalized code
 Done ::{{subst:RFPR|d}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|done}} ~~~~
 Already done by {{admin|X}} ::{{subst:RFPR|ad|X}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|alreadydone|X}} ~~~~
 Revoked ::{{subst:RFPR|r}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|revoked}} ~~~~
 Not done ::{{subst:RFPR|nd}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|notdone}} ~~~~
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only {{{X}}} edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. ::{{subst:RFPR|exp|X}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|moreedits|X}} ~~~~
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. I see you just also applied for Pending Changes Reviewer. Let's see how you get on with that first and then we'll take another look again when you've made a few more edits. ::{{subst:RFPR|rvw}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|alsorequestedreviewer}} ~~~~
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. This is not what Rollback is for. Take a moment to read Wikipedia:Rollback and if that's what you would like to do, you can then check out the Counter Vandalism Unit to learn more. ::{{subst:RFPR|nrb}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|notrollback}} ~~~~
I have a good understanding of policies of wikipedia and I am currently patrolling new pages and occasionally reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits. I am requesting the rollback right because I want to focus on reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits beside patrolling new pages. Supdiop (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I have been looking over your contribs and your talk page and I do not believe your understanding of Wikipedia policies is solid as you claim. You've made somel deletion nominations that were apparently inappropriate, and you created an article that met multiple speedy deletion criteria as well as not even being in English. Although these are seperate issues from vandalism patrolling, it seems you generally have a very shallow, incomplete understanding of the policies you have been attempting to uphold, which gives me no faith that you would use rollback appropriately. I would suggest getting some experience manually dealing with vandals, and taking advantage of WP:CVU to help you gain an adequate understanding of the correct methods for dealing with vandals. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I periodically revert vandalism and simply believe that it would be a useful feature to speed up this process. Sometimes I patrol IPs on RecentChanges and would find it useful if I had this feature. JZCL 20:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
After being rejected a month ago, I'm back! I would like to use Huggle, as I find that STiki doesn't exactly fit me well. I have over 1,000 edits (yes, I'm not exaggerating), which is WAY more than the required 200 edits. I hope this is enough for Rollback. ABCDEFADtalk to me 21:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 21:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]