Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MusikBot (talk | contribs) at 17:00, 9 June 2015 (Bot clerking, commented on 1 request, repaired 1 malformed request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Confirmed

(add requestview requests)
Hello, requesting confirmed status so I can edit Yousef Erakat Rainbow unicorn (talk) 15:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you're used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5% of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that 95% of the articles can use your help right now! Beeblebrox (talk) 18:29, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi this Arvin Lopez, production assistant from MYX Philippines I just request to authorize to edit our wikipedia page to update the information of our company. Thank You So Much! For further verification you email me at ASLopez-CTL@abs-cbn.com Arvin Lopez (talk) 16:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 16:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you're used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5% of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that 95% of the articles can use your help right now! Beeblebrox (talk) 18:29, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've been performing a good deal of vandalism revision, and am hoping to gain access to Twinkle so I can be more efficient. If you prefer I wait out the four days, I can do so. I have over 150 edits, so I'm hoping my body of work is large enough to justify confirming me. Thanks for considering this, whatever the result is. BU Rob13 (talk) 21:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, While you are doing good work, please wait until the autoconfirmed permission is granted. Nakon 02:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting the Confirmed user right for my new account, Gloomy Dawn. This is a new account of mine that I plan on using instead of this one, Kinaro, which I have been inactive on for a few years now. I am looking for a fresh start on Wikipedia and would like to jump right into editing with the new account. I have also posted requests for the Rollback and Pending Changes Reviewer permissions. I am willing to provide evidence that the new account is mine in whatever way possible. Kinaro(say hello) (what's been done) 04:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Kinaro: User:Gloomy Dawn does not show up in your user creation log. Can you confirm the connection by endorsing this request using your new account? Have you read the policy on a clean start? MusikAnimal talk 04:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is my new account, posting to endorse this request, as well as other requests for I made under Kinaro for a transfer of user rights. I also request that those user rights be removed from the old account. I am aware of the policy regarding a clean start and had my user page for the previous account deleted several years ago. Gloomy Dawn (talk) 04:46, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done MusikAnimal talk 14:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have written a draft document describing stepped wedge trials, which are a new form of clinical trials that are increasingly being used. However, for users to appreciate the difference between this trial, and other trials, a schematic representation is the best method. Similarly, it highlights where the trial designs name originates from Jtm939 (talk) 09:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To have the rights of confirmed user while promising to keep on all Wikipedia guidelines The Ghost Action (talk) 16:39, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Don't expect this to happen, but I'd like to start using Twinkle for de-vandalism. My account isn't 4 days old yet, but I do have 10+ Article-space contributions. (talk to) TheOtherGaelan('s contributions) 16:55, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 17:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]