Talk:William H. Johnson (artist)

William H. Johnson (artist) is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) at 19:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

African diaspora

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Disability

William H. Johnson (artist) is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

GA nomination

i'm going to nominate this for GA, since the revscore indicates it.[1] i trust user:Mary Mark Ockerbloom has it in hand. Duckduckstop (talk) 20:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Duckduckstop: I haven't actually dealt with a GA before, but if you're willing to lend an eye to the process I'm game to get involved :-) Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 23:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the lead to be more comprehensive, and reviewed all the links cited, to ensure that they are current. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 01:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Mark Ockerbloom, I thought I should let you know that Duckduckstop has just been blocked as a sockpuppet. If you'd still like to pursue this GA nomination, I'm happy to convert the nomination to be yours (there's a chance the nomination could be reverted otherwise, since edits by sockpuppets are frequently unwound). Just let me know how you'd like to proceed. (Duckduckstop nominated 17 articles in a very short period of time, and all but your two have been reverted or closed.) Don't let yourself be discouraged from pursuing the two nominations you have currently; I don't think you would have needed his help. If you do have any questions about the process, feel free to ask me. Best of luck! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BlueMoonset:, yes, please convert these over to me, so that they can hopefully go forward. I'm so sorry to hear that there's an issue. As I noted above, I'm not familiar with the GA process, so any advice going forward would be much appreciated. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 13:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Mary Mark Ockerbloom, this one is done, and I'll be doing the other one shortly. Right now, the reviews are at the "waiting" stage; that section and the next (What to do during a review) explain the next steps in the process, as you wait for a reviewer to select and then start reviewing your nominations against the Good Article criteria. The reviewer will typically list changes that are needed to meet the criteria, and there's back-and-forth as you make edits to improve the article accordingly and/or explain why what they have requested wouldn't accurately reflect the sources and what you propose to do instead. It can be a nicely collaborative process. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]