Jump to content

1957 Philadelphia municipal election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coemgenus (talk | contribs) at 15:29, 11 February 2017 (Judges and magistrates: c/e). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Philadelphia's municipal election of November 5, 1957, involved the election of the district attorney, city controller, and the remainder of a term for one city council seat, as well as several row offices and judgeships. Democrats were successful city-wide, continuing a run of victories racked up after the passage of a new city charter in 1951 despite growing divisions between factions of the party.

Background

After the Democrats' electoral victories in 1951, 1953, and 1955, they hoped to further solidify their hold on city offices by ousting the few Republicans left in power. At the same time, however, they were faced with growing divisions within their own party. Democrats had won in 1951 by combining with reform-minded Republicans and independents. By 1954, however, some Democrats led by Council President James Hugh Joseph Tate tried to weaken the civil service reforms of the new charter by allowing city employees to become involved in electioneering once more.[1] They fell just of the two-thirds vote in Council to put their amendments on the ballot, but in 1956, Tate's faction again proposed charter amendments aimed at weakening civil service protections and this time found the required vote to put it on to the ballot for popular approval.[2] The referendum failed in a vote that April.[3]

The rift widened by 1957 as U.S. Senator (and former Democratic mayor of Philadelphia) Joseph S. Clark, Jr. joined his successor, Richardson Dilworth, in refusing to back the Democratic ticket, citing mismanagement and political cronyism.[4] Republicans, led by City Committee Chairman Wilbur H. Hamilton, used the occasion to woo reform-minded voters by claiming their ticket was free of machine control, and that they "owe nothing to the political bosses."[4] Meanwhile, voter interest in the off-year election was low despite extensive radio and print advertising by both parties.[5]

District Attorney

In an arrangement that predates the 1951 City Charter, Philadelphia elects a District Attorney independent of the mayor's office. Dilworth had been elected to the office in 1951 and re-elected in 1953, but resigned in 1955 to run for mayor.[6] Victor H. Blanc, a city councilman and former assistant district attorney, was elected to fill the unexpired term.[6] Blanc was a veteran of both World Wars who, during his time on the council, led an investigation into corruption in construction at Philadelphia International Airport.[7] In 1957, he ran for a full four-year term, but his connection with machine politics led Clark and Dilworth to withhold their endorsement of him.[4] The Republican nominee was Emil F. Goldhaber, a local lawyer who had worked in the state attorney general's office and in private practice.[8] He was unopposed in the primary. The split in the Democratic leadership made the district attorney's race the liveliest of the campaign, according to Philadelphia Inquirer writer Joseph H. Miller.[6]

Blanc overcame the intra-party dissension to defeat Goldhaber, although his vote total was reduced to 56%, down from the 60% of the vote he received two years earlier.[9] Blanc thanked the voters "who showed great faith" in him, and Goldhaber conceded by 10:30 p.m. on election night.[9] Blanc would hold the position of district attorney until 1960, when he was appointed to the Court of Common Pleas.[10] Goldhaber returned to private practice and was also later appointed to the bench, serving as a bankruptcy judge from 1966 to 1986.[8]

Philadelphia district attorney election, 1957[11]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Victor H. Blanc 303,633 56.23 −3.96
Republican Emil F. Goldhaber 236,357 43.77 +3.96

City Controller

Under the 1951 City Charter, Philadelphia elects a City Controller to sit at the head of an independent auditing department. The Controller approves all payments made out of the city treasury and audits the executive departments.[12] As an independently elected official, the Controller is not responsible to the mayor or the city council.[12] The office was created as one of the good-government reforms intended to reduce the corruption that had previously plagued city government and led to the reform coalition of 1951.[12]

Republican Foster A. Dunlap had won the office in 1953, making it one of the few his party controlled in the city. The party renomnated him without opposition. Democrat Alexander M. Hemphill was the organization-backed candidate, and he defeated political outsider George Glick without difficulty.[13] Unlike in the district attorney's race, the Democrats were united on the choice for city controller and Clark and Dilworth both publicly endorsed Hemphill.[5] The result was a solid victory for the Democrats as Hemphill was elected by a thirteen-point margin.[11]

Philadelphia City Controller election, 1957[11]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Alexander M. Hemphill 304,859 56.96 +8.25
Republican Foster A. Dunlap 230,350 43.04 −8.25

Other row offices

The Republicans had also maintained their hold on the patronage-rich office of Register of Wills in 1953, electing attorney and former football star Robert C. Duffy, by a slim margin over the Democratic nominee, former Congressman Francis R. Smith.[14] Duffy did not run for re-election, and the Republican nomination was contested between factions of the Republican party organization, a "regular" faction, led by Hamilton; and an insurgent faction led by former Sheriff Austin Meehan and Board of Revision of Taxes President William F. Meade.[13] The Hamilton faction carried the day, winning the nomination for their man, Joseph P. Gorham.[13] Democrats were more united on their choice, selecting Deputy State Insurance Commissioner Bernard J. Kelley in an uncontested primary.[13]

Kelley was victorious, reversing the Republicans' gains of four years earlier and winning by a fifteen-point margin. The story was similar in the election for the Clerk of Courts, with Democrat Louis Amarando defeating republican Herbert Cain by a 58% to 42% margin.[11] As Miller wrote the next day, the "victory also demonstrated the supremacy of the [Democratic] party in Philadelphia from an organizational standpoint".[13]

Philadelphia Register of Wills election, 1957[11]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Bernard J. Kelley 315,617 57.79 +8.50
Republican Joseph P. Gorham 230,552 42.21 −8.50

City Council special election

Voters in the 1st district also voted for city council in 1957 in a special election called after the death of Councilman Thomas I. Guerin the year before. Democratic ward leaders in the district nominated Emanuel Weinberg, leader of the 39th ward and a former state Deputy Secretary of Insurance. The nomination was not without controversy: Governor George M. Leader fired Weinberg along with several other political appointees who were found, as the Philadelphia Inquirer reported, to have "enjoyed immunity from supervision and control and were permitted to pursue their private enterprises in addition to their State duties."[15]

The nomination drew criticism from reform-minded Democrats, including Clark, who said the nomination showed "contempt for the independent vote."[16] Weinberg's nomination also disappointed Guerin's widow, Mary C. Guerin, who ran as an independent. Guerin noted that Weinberg had been fired from his state job for good reason, saying "one would suppose that Governor Leader did not fire him for being late for work."[17] Despite the split in Democratic support, Weinberg achieved a clear victory over Guerin and their Republican opponent, John Donnelly.[11]

Philadelphia city council special election, district 1, 1957[11]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Emanuel Weinberg 34,462 62.37 +0.15
Republican John Donnelly 19,288 34.91 −2.87
Fidelity Mary C. Guerin 1,508 2.72 +2.72

Judges and magistrates

Although Pennsylvania's judges are elected in partisan elections, there had been a tradition of not challenging the re-election of incumbents, or "sitting judges." To that end, judicial candidates were typically endorsed by both major parties. The parties had followed the sitting judge tradition in 1951, but in 1953 the Democrats broke the informal pact and endorsed just three of the sitting judges.[18] The result was an unusually intense contest for the thirteen seats available, which the Republicans won.[19]

By 1957, the old order was mostly re-established as fourteen of the fifteen judges were endorsed for re-election by both parties and returned to office without opposition.[11] The fifteenth, 75-year-old Joseph L. Kun, was President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas and had served on the court for twenty-eight years.[20] In February, lawyers from the city bar association voted by a 2-to-1 margin to not endorse his re-election, calling him unqualified to hold office.[20] Despite the bipartisan effort against him among the city's layers, Kun filed for re-election in both parties' primaries. Kun won the Republican nomination handily, but lost the Democratic nomination to Earl Chudoff, a member of the federal House of Representatives from Pennsylvania's 4th congressional district.[13] In November, Chudoff won easily, taking 58% of the vote.[11]

Ballot questions

In the primary ballot, voters agreed to divide the 35th ward into seven wards, accounting for the increased settlement in the city's Northeast section that made the ward extremely populous. The action brought the total number of wards to 58. The measure had support from both parties and passed overwhelmingly.[21] In the general election, two loans questions were on the ballot: $16 million for general municipal improvements, and $10 million for water and sewer systems. Both measures passed.[11]

References

Sources

Newspapers

Reports