User talk:Vendromeblah

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vendromeblah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am repeatedly being blocked by bbb23 claiming I am a sock puppet of some identity I have never heard of.My intention is not to disrupt any edit or cause any problems.It is only to provide factual information to wikipedia with published sources and help in any way I canJust because people share same networks doesnt mean they are sock puppets.It is a technical assumption PLEASE Unblock me.I have a lot to contribute.If my contributions are considered as useless YES you may block me forever.But atleast give me a chance.Vendromeblah (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account has only ever been blocked once, so if you have been repeatedly blocked on other accounts then you need to make your unblock appeal from the oldest one. And do not just create a new account whenever your latest account is blocked, for whatever reason. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HELP-I have been blocked

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Vendromeblah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I seem to have been blocked indefinitely.I still cannot understand why I am supposed to be a sock puppet.I just happen to use a network that millions other use and many have abused it.It does not mean I have done so.I need to be given a chance.The Checkuser has blocked it.This effectively means I cannot edit Wikipedia anywhere.The person who has blocked me indefinitely has stated that there is a pattern to my editing.He knows nothing about the subjects I am editing and the pattern does not mean I am a sock puppet as long as I can contribute facts.Thank you and please consider this request once againVendromeblah (talk) 03:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I seem to have been blocked indefinitely.I still cannot understand why I am supposed to be a sock puppet.I just happen to use a network that millions other use and many have abused it.It does not mean I have done so.I need to be given a chance.The Checkuser has blocked it.This effectively means I cannot edit Wikipedia anywhere.The person who has blocked me indefinitely has stated that there is a pattern to my editing.He knows nothing about the subjects I am editing and the pattern does not mean I am a sock puppet as long as I can contribute facts.Thank you and please consider this request once again[[User:Vendromeblah|Vendromeblah]] ([[User talk:Vendromeblah#top|talk]]) 03:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I seem to have been blocked indefinitely.I still cannot understand why I am supposed to be a sock puppet.I just happen to use a network that millions other use and many have abused it.It does not mean I have done so.I need to be given a chance.The Checkuser has blocked it.This effectively means I cannot edit Wikipedia anywhere.The person who has blocked me indefinitely has stated that there is a pattern to my editing.He knows nothing about the subjects I am editing and the pattern does not mean I am a sock puppet as long as I can contribute facts.Thank you and please consider this request once again[[User:Vendromeblah|Vendromeblah]] ([[User talk:Vendromeblah#top|talk]]) 03:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I seem to have been blocked indefinitely.I still cannot understand why I am supposed to be a sock puppet.I just happen to use a network that millions other use and many have abused it.It does not mean I have done so.I need to be given a chance.The Checkuser has blocked it.This effectively means I cannot edit Wikipedia anywhere.The person who has blocked me indefinitely has stated that there is a pattern to my editing.He knows nothing about the subjects I am editing and the pattern does not mean I am a sock puppet as long as I can contribute facts.Thank you and please consider this request once again[[User:Vendromeblah|Vendromeblah]] ([[User talk:Vendromeblah#top|talk]]) 03:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

In your previous request you said "I am repeatedly being blocked..." (my emphasis). How many times have you been blocked? Under which accounts? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have been accused of being a sock puppet and a disruptor of edits based on "patterns" when I have provided substantial and valuable information.I may use different IP addresses and have specific subjects that interest me but that does not make me a Vandal or Sock puppet of some crazy identity I have never heard of.yes-If I contribute material that is of no vaue and does not meet wikipedia standards-By all means go ahead and block me.The page ==Chhota Shakeel== has been semi-protected when there is credible information that I can contibute in terms of the edit.I am an investigative journalist and not a vandal and to assume that I am a sock puppet because I use a network that a million people use is unfair and it is really sad to see me blocked permanently for an indefinite period of time.BBB23 removed all the logs on that article.He know nothing on that subject-on what basis has he done this?He repeatedly does this and I call it vandalism of a different kind.I only wanted to add an info box and add a few lines with citational sources that are published by credible platforms.
I repeat, on which other accounts have you been repeatedly blocked? Ignoring my question will not help your unblock chances. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
FRST TIME and permanently-My user page says This account is a sock puppet of Vaibhavpomal123 (talk · contribs · logs), and it has been blocked indefinitely.

Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sock puppet for evidence. This policy subsection may also be helpful.

I dont even know who Vaibhavpomal123 is
Can you help me sort this.Its too complicated.i cannot seem to figure it out.
This edit request to Chhota Shakeel has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Your edit request is inappropriate. While blocked, you have access to this talk page solely to get unblocked. Nor did you suggest an edit, though had you done so, we'd have refused. --Yamla (talk) 11:18, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Refused even if factual content is contributed? Is not wikipedia about facts that are verifiable?Vendromeblah (talk) 11:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]