User talk:Woshiyiweizhongguoren

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Welcome!

Hello, Woshiyiweizhongguoren, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 19:11, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about AIs on Wikipedia?

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren,

Welcome to the Wikipedia community!

Did you know that Artificial Intelligences (AIs) support Wikipedia? I saw your post on Teahouse, and I’m personally contacting a small handful of new Wikipedia editors to make sure your voice is heard as we build and refine these AIs.

Will you please provide an interview to share your thoughts about AI on Wikipedia? It would only take about 30 minutes over phone or video chat. We will send you a $15 Amazon gift card as a way to thank you for your time.

I am working in collaboration with Wikimedia Foundation staff to do this research, so if you decide to participate, your opinion could help build the future of Wikipedia. Hope to talk to you soon!

PS. You can learn more about our study here.

Best, Bowen, aka Bobo.03 (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No comment. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 11:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Draft:Xiamen Bridge

Hello Woshiyiweizhongguoren, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Xiamen Bridge, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: No reason was given. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:51, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I patrol new pages? That's a new one. :thinking: Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 11:40, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletions are often applied by people who regularly patrol new pages. Eastman assumed includes you. David notMD (talk) 15:11, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it'll be at least a year before I can feel comfortable patrolling new pages. What do you think? Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 15:13, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've been here for more than ten years, working on improving existing articles, and recently, at Teahouse. It's a choice. Many newcomers are here because they want to create an article on a specific topic. Others are drawn to anti-vandalism or copyright violation monitoring. Whatever moves you. David notMD (talk) 09:16, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-vandalism efforts actually interest me. I sometimes patrol recent changes and keep a lookout for vandals, and Im planning to join the Counter-Vandalism Unit sometime soon. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 20:59, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Do I have to be a template editor to create user boxes (and other templates), or can I just be an auto confirmed user like I already am?

Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 11:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you read WP:Template editor and also WP:Protection policy#Template protection. Also worth reading WP:Template namespace and WP:Userboxes#Which namespace?. - David Biddulph (talk) 11:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 12:22, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren! You created a thread called Haha at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren! You created a thread called How do you like my new signature? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren! You created a thread called References at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren! You created a thread called Archiving my talk page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tetris Effect move

I undid your move of the video game page off "Tetris Effect". Per W:DIFFCAPS, we have no problem with two different articles with the same name but differing by capitalization/style as long as the hatnotes are used to point to the other ones as necessary. (also, if a disambiguation was needed, "(video game)" is the right phrase to use to distinguish it from board/tabletop games.) --Masem (t) 14:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Masem: There is no article titled "W:DIFFCAPS". Perhaps you meant something different? Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 15:58, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DIFFCAPS --Masem (t) 18:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I wasn't aware that article titles were case-sensitive until now. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 18:09, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louwailou has been accepted

Louwailou, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 17:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren! You created a thread called A little technical problem at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Just making sure that I got everything right: after two weeks, a bot will come and start moving threads to User talk:Woshiyiweizhongguoren/Archive 1. Is that so?

Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 23:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that the bot will start sooner; it will archive everything that's older than 14 days. The first thread should reach that age in about five days. Huon (talk) 00:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren! You created a thread called Why are these three disambiguation articles separate? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Thank you for your help! You are very helpful and nice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duskbean (talk • contribs) 11:48, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Duskbean: You're welcome. Just remember to sign your comments by typing four tiles in a row. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 11:51, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Duskbean: Also, in case you haven't noticed, it's April now. Hehe. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 12:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Woshiyiweizhongguoren: Yes, it's April now. :) —Duskbean (talk, 12:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

At the top of my draft Draft:Hulishan Fortress, there is a template called "人物保护单位". On the Chinese Wikipedia the draft is copied from (for now), the template shows a big box containing a picture of the Fortress, it's preservation status, and other statistics.

The problem, however, is that the template is in Chinese, and thus does not function on English Wikipedia. But since I've seen similar boxes (if not identical boxes) on English Wikipedia articles about similar topics, I know that the template in question most likely exists here, just having a different name. But what is that different name? I tried all the translations of the Chinese name of the template using edit preview, but nothing seems to work. Anybody know what the right template to use is?

Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 11:14, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the infobox template with the one for "historic site" as that seemed to be the best fit. Some things I couldn't find fields for. More later. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 11:41, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When you translate articles from the Chinese Wikipedia, please remember to make use of Template:Translated page on the draft's talk page to provide the attribution required by Wikipedia's license. Huon (talk) 11:57, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Drat. I thought the copyright attribution was only necessary after the conversion of the draft into an article. But I understand now, and have added the template to my other drafts too. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 18:40, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Please could you remove this report. No vandalism involved, just harassment from an annoying editor who wouldn't stop posting to my talk page. Thanks. --wooden superman 11:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 11:26, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) --wooden superman 11:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Woodensuperman: Reply to the discussions, and there wouldn't be such a need to post on your talk page. -- /Alex/₂₁ 11:28, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, please don't scream all caps and curse words. If I were in the situation, I would have blocked you on the spot. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 11:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Woodensuperman, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your repeated edits to that page were edit warring. A user is entitled to remove messages from his own user talk page, except in specific circumstances; see WP:BLANKING. Please learn about Wikipedia's rules. David Biddulph (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren! You created a thread called It's been less than two weeks... at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren! You created a thread called Did I make my first userbox right? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren! You created a thread called My draft at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren! You created a thread called Reply templates at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woshiyiweizhongguoren! You created a thread called Signature at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

What exactly does substituting templates do, and why is it necessary in some cases?

Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 13:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This probably explains it a bit more than you're looking for but: Wikipedia:Substitution. Tl;dr it's so if a template is changed it doesn't break it everywhere else. Praxidicae (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Grahmart

I blocked because the user set off an edit filter, see here. If you go to a user's contributions you'll see a link to the user's edit filter log, In this case, the filter showed the user had tried to spam links to a website with the same name; per the username policy, specifically our section on accounts named after organizations, this is not allowed. The edit filter log isn't the easiest place to find if you don't know where to find it, so I hope this helps. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 13:15, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks for keeping Wikipedia free of advertisements and promotional content. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 13:17, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. And never hesitate to ask questions, thanks for all your hard work too. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 13:21, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The latest entry on the edit filter log is for a user named User:NAGARAZ, for possible sleeper account creations. But there exists no such user. What's going on?

Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 18:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My guess would be that there's a system in place to limit the number of accounts that can be created by any given user/IP. Attempts to exceed the limit get stopped by the server rather than the filter itself which is why they would be logged as "no action taken" rather than "disallow" despite the action logged actually getting disallowed at a higher level (resulting in the account not getting created). I'll leave this help request open in case someone more familiar with the system wants to offer a better explanation. 78.28.54.200 (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Each IP is allotted a maximum of 4 accounts per day, though this is occasionally lifted in the event of educational programs, events, etc. ᴀɴᴏɴʏᴍᴜᴤᴤ ᴜᴤᴇʀ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 19:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

But then, what about the account name not being registered? Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 20:01, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My reading is that someone tried to create the account, had the attempt logged, but didn't succeed due to the throttle - thus there's an edit filter log entry but no account. Huon (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because you thanked me

Woshiyiweizhongguoren, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...
YOU'RE WELCOME!
It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! ~~~

~~~~~ ᴀɴᴏɴʏᴍᴜᴤᴤ ᴜᴤᴇʀ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 20:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of attack pages

Incidentally, certainly this was a marginal case, but if you think a page has attack page characteristics it's best to tag it as one. That way the page's name doesn't appear on the user's talk page or anywhere else on Wikipedia (e.g. your CSD action log page, if you have one), so the subject's name isn't spread more widely. As this person's name is common it's less of an issue, but I thought it might be good to say that in case you didn't know already. Blythwood (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Blythwood: That's useful, thanks. What's a CSD action log, by the way? Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 21:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, it's simple. I use the module Twinkle that does push-button CSD filing (which, fortunately, I don't do often-I mostly use it to put a welcome page on new users' talk pages!). It records a log of every page you've tagged for CSD. Mine is here: you'll see at the bottom that although it says I tagged an attack page for deletion, it doesn't give the page's title. Blythwood (talk) 21:48, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I knew about the Twinkle CSD feature from since I got Twinkle, and I know how to use it well. I just didn't know that that was what you were referring to when you said: "CSD action log." Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 22:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question

What about this newly registered User:Gaylordbush69? Regards. Jingiby (talk) 04:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jingiby: Hmm. If you have any suspicions, why don't you start an SPI, providing diffs from both users as evidence? Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 12:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Woshiyiweizhongguoren I'm just going to leave a friendly suggestion not to tag sock userpages, particularly before they are blocked and I'd advise against it even after given your short tenure here. You should leave this to admins, SPI clerks and checkusers. Praxidicae (talk) 14:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: Thanks for the tips. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 14:47, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Not here behaviour, obvious sock who is trolling us.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Woshiyiweizhongguoren (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}